ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1095

Pooled Safety Data From Randomized, Controlled Trials Of Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel 1% In Subjects With Acute Pain

Roy D. Altman1, Helmut Pabst2, Hans-Georg Predel3, Bruno Giannetti4, Ian Burnett5, Morris Gold6 and Evan F. Ekman7, 1David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 2Independent Physician, Gilching, Germany, 3German Sports University, Cologne, Germany, 4CRM clinical trials GmbH, Rheinbach, Germany, 5Novartis Consumer Health, Nyon, Switzerland, 6Novartis Consumer Health, Parsippany, NJ, 7Southern Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Columbia, SC

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), pain management and safety

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Fibromyalgia, Soft Tissue Disorders and Pain II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Diclofenac sodium topical gel (DSG) 1% is clinically proven to be effective and well-tolerated for treatment of osteoarthritis pain and could be appropriate to treat acute conditions, such as ankle sprains and soft tissue injuries. Current treatment options include oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which may be associated with an increased risk of systemic side effects (eg, gastrointestinal), and topically applied rubefacients, which could be ineffective. Previous pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated that topically applied diclofenac gel results in low systemic exposure. Three randomized, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trials were conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of DSG 1% in subjects with acute ankle sprain or soft tissue injury/contusion. Safety data from the 3 controlled trials were pooled and are presented in this analysis.  

Methods: Two trials were conducted in ankle sprain and 1 trial in contusion. The 3 trials were similar in design and subject population except for the site of the acute injury.  Treatment was 3 g DSG 1% or placebo to affected ankle q.i.d. for 7 days or 2 g DSG 1% or placebo to the contusion q.i.d. for 2-7 days, until resolution. AEs were reported either during subject visits or in subject diaries in each trial.  The 3 AE databases were pooled for an overall safety analysis. Blood samples were collected for laboratory safety analyses before randomization and at end of study.

Results: Safety data were available for 615 subjects (mean age 30.9±12.0 years). A total of 7788 doses of DSG 1% (N=310) and 7670 doses of placebo (N=305) were applied over the 3 trials. There were no meaningful differences in the incidence of AEs between treatment groups. AEs occurred in 19 DSG 1% subjects (6.1%) and 16 placebo subjects (5.2%). Most were mild and self-resolving. Eight were considered treatment-related: 2 AEs in 1 DSG 1% subject (dry skin and erythema) and 6 AEs in 4 placebo subjects (application site pruritus, joint warmth, erythema, rash and pruritus [2]). There was 1 serious AE in the placebo group (distortion of wrist and rupture of scapholunate ligament), not considered to be treatment-related. Gastrointestinal, hepatic, and renal AEs were rare (≤2 events reported), while hematological and cardiac AEs were absent. Mean values for liver function test results, (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin) were within normal ranges at baseline and end of study and did not suggest any clinically significant systemic alterations during the course of the study. The overall safety profile of DSG 1% was similar to that of placebo.

Conclusion: DSG 1% applied 4 times daily for 7 days was found to be well-tolerated and no specific safety concerns were identified in these controlled clinical trials. Overall, the safety profile of DSG 1% demonstrates that it could be an appropriate treatment option for patients with acute painful conditions who have a need to minimize the systemic absorption of NSAIDS.


Disclosure:

R. D. Altman,

Novartis Consumer Health,

5;

H. Pabst,

Novartis Consumer Health,

9;

H. G. Predel,

Novartis Consumer Health,

9;

B. Giannetti,

Novartis Consumer Health,

9;

I. Burnett,

Novartis ,

1,

Novartis Consumer Health,

3;

M. Gold,

Novartis ,

1,

Novartis Consumer Health,

3;

E. F. Ekman,

Novartis Consumer Health,

9,

Evan Ekman,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pooled-safety-data-from-randomized-controlled-trials-of-diclofenac-sodium-topical-gel-1-in-subjects-with-acute-pain/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology