ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2594

Physician/Site Staff Assessments Contribute to High Placebo Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials

Xie Xu1, Bin Dong2, Chyi-Hung Hsu2, Chuanpu Hu2, Chihshan Lei3, Jiao Song1, Jiandong Lu2 and Anna Beutler2, 1Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Diego, CA, 2Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 3Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: ACR and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: High ACR responses in placebo group have been frequently observed in recent RA trials, most notably, in patients with inadequate response (IR) to methotrexate (MTX) or other disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The factors that contribute to high placebo responses in RA trials were investigated.

Methods:  Total 10 ph2 and 3 RA trials in a database were pooled for meta-analysis (981 placebo subjects). All were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in active RA MTX/DMARD-IR (N=9) or TNF-IR (N=1) populations in combination with stable doses of MTX (N=8) and/or other DMARDs (N=2). Baseline demographic and disease characteristics of participants were similar across these trials. Placebo response in each ACR component was summarized. Univariate logistic regression was used to identify patient baseline risk factors for placebo response after adjusting for study and time point. 

Results: In each of the 10 RA trials, at Week 12, median percent improvement from baseline in placebo group was consistently higher in physician/site  staff assessments, ie swollen/tender joint counts, and physician’s global assessment of disease activity, compared to patient’s assessment of pain, global assessment of disease activity and  function (HAQ-DI). Decrease in CRP in response to placebo was also observed (Table 1) however, often with more variability compared to other ACR components (data not shown). Patient baseline characteristics significantly predicting ACR20 placebo response are summarized in Table 2. A higher ACR Placebo response was observed in Latin America compared to Europe in 6 out of 7 RA trials that included Latin American sites (Figure 1).

Conclusion: The assessments performed by investigator or site staff are more sensitive to placebo response compared to the patient reported outcomes. Multiple patient baseline risk factors for ACR20 placebo response were identified and further investigation using multivariate model is warranted to delineate the independent predictors for high placebo response in RA trials. The Latin American region showed a consistently high placebo response across RA trials which often led to diminishing treatment effect detectable in this region.

Figure 1: High ACR20 Placebo Response in the Latin American Region Observed in 6 RA Trials  


Disclosure: X. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; B. Dong, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; C. H. Hsu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; C. Hu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; C. Lei, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; J. Song, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; J. Lu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; A. Beutler, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Xu X, Dong B, Hsu CH, Hu C, Lei C, Song J, Lu J, Beutler A. Physician/Site Staff Assessments Contribute to High Placebo Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/physiciansite-staff-assessments-contribute-to-high-placebo-response-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-clinical-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/physiciansite-staff-assessments-contribute-to-high-placebo-response-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-clinical-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology