ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2550

Phase 3 Equira 48 Week Study Results Demonstrated No Impact on Efficacy and Safety When Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Were Switched between Reference Etanercept (ETN) and GP2015, an Etanercept Biosimilar

Arthur Kavanaugh1, Marco Matucci-Cerinic2, Hendrik Schulze-Koops3, Maya Buch4, Yannick Allanore5, Eugeniusz J. Kucharz6 and Goran Babic7, 1UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, La Jolla, CA, 2Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, 3Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany, Munich, Germany, 4University of Leeds, United Kingdom, Leeds, United Kingdom, 5Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France, Paris, France, 6Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland, Katowice, Poland, 7Hexal AG, a Sandoz company, Holzkirchen, Germany, Holzkirchen, Germany

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biosimilars and etanercept

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatments Poster III: Biosimilars and New Compounds

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Compared to ETN, GP2015 has equivalent efficacy, and comparable safety and immunogenicity in patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis.1 The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of GP2015 and ETN and evaluate the effects of switching from ETN to GP2015 in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: EQUIRA was a 48-week, randomized, double-blind, Phase 3, two treatment period confirmatory study. The primary endpoint was equivalent change from baseline (BL) in DAS28-CRP at week 24. Patients ≥18 years with active RA (ACR 1987 or ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for ≥ 6 months before BL and active disease defined as DAS28-CRP ≥3.2 and CRP >5 mg/L or ESR ≥28 mm/h) and inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) were randomized 1:1 to 50 mg GP2015 or ETN subcutaneously once weekly for 24 weeks (Treatment period 1 [TP1]). Patients with at least moderate EULAR response at Week 24 either continued GP2015 treatment or, in the ETN group, were switched to receive 50 mg GP2015 up to 48 weeks (Treatment period 2 [TP2]). All patients continued to receive concomitant MTX (10–25 mg/week) at a stable dose and folic acid. Efficacy outcome measures included change in DAS28-CRP, EULAR and ACR20/50/70 responses.

Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the GP2015 (n=186) and ETN (n=190) groups. The primary endpoint for equivalence during TP1 was met and previously presented.2 At Week 48, the ACR 20 response rates were comparable between patients who continued on or switched to GP2015 (Figure 1). In TP2, treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) (Figure 2) occurred in 42.9% vs 38.0% patients with only 13.1% vs. 11.4% considered drug related in the continued GP2015 (n=175) vs the switched (n=166) groups; serious AEs occurred in 2.3% vs 2.4% patients (TP2 safety set). Injection site reactions occurred in 6 (3.6%) patients in the switched group but none in the continued GP2015 group. In TP2, four (2.4%) patients in the continued GP2015 group had single-event, very low titer, non-neutralizing antidrug antibodies detected.

Conclusion: The efficacy of GP2015 over 48 weeks was comparable to that of ETN. In addition, the switch from ETN to GP2015 did not impact efficacy and safety of etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe RA.

References: 1. Griffiths CEM, et al. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176:928–38; 2. Kavanaugh A, et al. [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10).

Figure 1. ACR20 Response Rates from Baseline through Week 48

Figure 2. Safety Overview (TP2)

 


Disclosure: A. Kavanaugh, Sandoz, 5,Merck & Co., 5,Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5; M. Matucci-Cerinic, Actelion, 2,Beyer, 2,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2,Chemomab, 2,Inventiva, 2,Pfizer, Inc., 2,Sandoz, 5; H. Schulze-Koops, None; M. Buch, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Roche, AbbVIe, Astra Zeneca, Sandoz, UCB, 2,Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Roche, Pfizer, and Sandoz, 5; Y. Allanore, Pfizer, Inc., 2,Sandoz, 2; E. J. Kucharz, AbbVie Inc., 5,Berlin Chemie, 5,Biogen, 5,Celgene Corporation, 5,Egis, 5,Eli Lilly and Co., 5,Merck & Co., 5,Novartis, 5,Pfizer, Inc., 5,Polpharma, 5,Roche, 5,Sandoz, 5,UCB, Inc., 5; G. Babic, Hexal AG, a Sandoz company, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kavanaugh A, Matucci-Cerinic M, Schulze-Koops H, Buch M, Allanore Y, Kucharz EJ, Babic G. Phase 3 Equira 48 Week Study Results Demonstrated No Impact on Efficacy and Safety When Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Were Switched between Reference Etanercept (ETN) and GP2015, an Etanercept Biosimilar [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/phase-3-equira-48-week-study-results-demonstrated-no-impact-on-efficacy-and-safety-when-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis-were-switched-between-reference-etanercept-etn-and-gp201/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/phase-3-equira-48-week-study-results-demonstrated-no-impact-on-efficacy-and-safety-when-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis-were-switched-between-reference-etanercept-etn-and-gp201/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology