ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2671

PET/CT Vascular Findings at Baseline and Six Months in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Giant Cell Arteritis

Anthony Sammel1, Edward Hsiao 1, Geoff Schembri 1, Elizabeth Bailey 1, Katherine Nguyen 1, Janice Brewer 1, Beatrice Janssen 1, Leslie Schrieber 1, Peter Youssef 2, Clare Fraser 3 and Rodger Laurent 1, 1Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia, 2Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia, 3Save Sight Institute, Sydney, Australia

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: 18FDG PET/CT scan, giant cell arteritis and large vessel vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders Poster III: Giant Cell Arteritis

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: PET/CT is a useful modality to diagnose GCA but there is limited knowledge as to how inflammatory vascular findings evolve on follow-up scans. This cohort study aimed to determine the change and clinical significance in vascular wall tracer (FDG) uptake in GCA patients from diagnosis to six-months.

Methods: This study included a subset of patients from the previously reported Giant Cell Arteritis and PET Scan (GAPS) cohort (Sammel et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019). Patients were newly suspected of having GCA and were prospectively enrolled if they had either 1) mural or periadventitial small vessel inflammation on temporal artery biopsy or 2) unequivocal large vessel vasculitis on baseline CT angiogram. Only patients with a clinical diagnosis of GCA were included in the final analysis. PET/CT from the vertex to diaphragm was performed at baseline and at six-months. A single PET-experienced physician, blinded to clinical, biopsy and study inclusion details, reported the grade of vascular FDG uptake for 18 artery segments (0 = none, 1 = minimal/equivocal, 2 = moderate, 3 = very marked). The maximum standard uptake value (SUV) for each vessel was compared to the mean SUV in the left atrium to give an SUVmax/SUVLA ratio. Patients and clinicians were unaware of the six-month PET vascular findings and were followed for 12-months.

Results: 24/64 GAPS patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 15 consented to six-month PET/CT and had a clinical diagnosis of GCA. From baseline to six-months, the mean vascular uptake grade per patient decreased from 0.81 to 0.32 (Table 1) with significant reductions in all vascular territories (p < = 0.01). The average SUVmax/SUVLA per patient decreased non-significantly from 1.26 to 1.18 (p = 0.16). Over this period the mean CRP fell from 70 to 9 mg/L and ESR fell from 59 to 15 mm/hr. 5/15 (33%) patients had persistent grade 2 (moderate) uptake in at least one artery on the six-month scan. Compared with their counterparts, these 5 patients had a non-significantly higher mean CRP (12 vs 8 mg/L), ESR (16 vs 15 mm/hr) and were taking a lower mean dose of prednisone (8 vs 12 mg). 3 were taking concomitant methotrexate and one an IL-6 inhibitor. None of these 5 patients experienced a clinical flare from 6-12 months but 60% had flares in the preceding six-months.

Conclusion: PET/CT vascular scores decreased in the first six-months following diagnosis of GCA. One-third of patients had significant ongoing vascular uptake at six-months but this did not predict future clinical flare.

Table 1: Mean visual and standard uptake value -SUV- vascular scores on baseline and six month PET/CT


Disclosure: A. Sammel, None; E. Hsiao, None; G. Schembri, None; E. Bailey, None; K. Nguyen, None; J. Brewer, None; B. Janssen, None; L. Schrieber, None; P. Youssef, None; C. Fraser, None; R. Laurent, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sammel A, Hsiao E, Schembri G, Bailey E, Nguyen K, Brewer J, Janssen B, Schrieber L, Youssef P, Fraser C, Laurent R. PET/CT Vascular Findings at Baseline and Six Months in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Giant Cell Arteritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pet-ct-vascular-findings-at-baseline-and-six-months-in-patients-with-newly-diagnosed-giant-cell-arteritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pet-ct-vascular-findings-at-baseline-and-six-months-in-patients-with-newly-diagnosed-giant-cell-arteritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology