ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2340

Persistent Use Of Biologic Therapies At Lower Than Recommended Dosing Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Enrolled In The US Medicare Program

Jie Zhang1, Fenglong Xie2, Elizabeth S. Delzell3, Huifeng Yun3, James Lewis4, Kevin Haynes5, Lang Chen6, Kenneth G. Saag7 and Jeffrey R. Curtis8, 1Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Rheumatology & Immunology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 5Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania., Philadelphia, PA, 6Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 7Immunology & Rheumatology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 8University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic agents and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy III

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Title: Persistent Use of Biologic Therapies at Lower Than Recommended Dosing among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Enrolled in the US Medicare Program

Background/Purpose: Biologic therapy is associated with significant personal and societal costs. One possible strategy to reduce such cost is the use of reduced dose biologic whenever possible and the appropriateness of such an approach has been shown in a randomized clinical trial. The objective of the study is to examine the use of self-injectable biologics at reduced dose compared to the recommended dose in real world clinical practice.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were enrolled in the Medicare fee for service program with prescription drug coverage from 2006 to 2010. Eligible patients were required to have initiated either etanercept or adalimumab after a 12-month period with continuous coverage free of that agent. Follow-up started at treatment initiation and ended when a patient discontinued their biologic (> 90 day gap since end of days supply), switched to a different biologic, lost coverage, or died. For each patient, we calculated the number of days covered under each filled prescription assuming a constant rate of use (etanercept: 50 mg/week; adalimumab: 40 mg/2 weeks). We divided the follow-up time into 6-month intervals in which a patient remained under follow-up at the end of the interval; within each interval we calculated the proportion of days covered by the medications out of the total number of days. We defined reduced-dose biologic as having < 80% of the days covered and calculated the proportion of patients who continuously used reduced-dose biologic for 18 months, 24 months, and 30 months.

Results: We identified 3943 RA patients who were eligible to be included in this analysis, mean age 62 (standard deviation: 13); 83% were women; 2,541 initiated etanercept; and 2,389 initiated adalimumab.  Among etanercept users, 11.4% of the patients received reduced-dose etanercept continuously for 18 months during their follow-up; 7.0% and 4.4% of the patient received reduced-dose etanercept continuously for at least 24 and 30 months, respectively. Among adalimumab users, the corresponding proportions were lower with 7.6%, 4.5%, and 1.9% of the persistent users received reduced-dose adalimumab for a continuous period of 18, 24, and 30 months. Data are also presented in the figure below.

Conclusion: In real-world clinical practice, up to 11% of RA patients received self-injectable biologics at a lower than the recommended dose for an extended period of time.

 

 

 

Figure Proportion of RA Patients who Continuously Used Reduced Dose Injectable Etanercept or Adalimumab

 


Disclosure:

J. Zhang,

Roche/Genentech,

2;

F. Xie,
None;

E. S. Delzell,

Amgen,

2;

H. Yun,
None;

J. Lewis,

Pfizer, Prometheus, Lilly, Shire, Nestle, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Amgen,

5,

Centocor, Shire, Takeda,

2;

K. Haynes,
None;

L. Chen,
None;

K. G. Saag,

Amgen,

2,

Eli Lilly and Company,

2,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

2,

Amgen,

5,

Eli Lilly and Company,

5,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

5;

J. R. Curtis,

Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, crescendo, AbbVie,

2,

Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, crescendo, AbbVie,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/persistent-use-of-biologic-therapies-at-lower-than-recommended-dosing-among-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-enrolled-in-the-us-medicare-program/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology