ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1238

Persistence At 12 Months With Denosumab (Prolia®) In Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: Interim Results From a Prospective Observational Study

Stuart L. Silverman1, Ethel Siris2, David L. Kendler3, Dea Belazi4, Jacques P. Brown5, Deborah T. Gold6, E. Michael Lewiecki7,8, Alexandra Papaioannou9, Christine Simonelli10, Irene Ferreira11, Paula Dakin12, Suresh Siddhanti12, Bradley Stolshek12 and Christopher Recknor13, 1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, UCLA Center of Excellence, Los Angeles, CA, 2Columbia University, New York, NY, 3University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4AlchemiPharma LLC, Wayne, PA, 5CHU de Québec Research Centre and Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 6Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 7University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, 8New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, 9Geriatric Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 10Health East Osteoporosis Care, Woodbury, MN, 11Amgen Inc., Cambridge, United Kingdom, 12Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 13United Osteoporosis Centers, Gainesville, GA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Denosumab and osteoporosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease: Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Persistence with osteoporosis therapy is important for optimal reduction of fracture risk. Persistence with denosumab was >90% in a randomized clinical trial in women with low bone mineral density (BMD), but persistence in the community setting is undetermined. We are conducting a prospective observational study to evaluate persistence with denosumab in routine clinical practice in the United States (US) and Canada (CAN).

Methods:

In this ongoing multicenter, single-arm study, women were enrolled within 4 weeks after the first injection of subcutaneous denosumab recommended for administration every 6 months for the treatment of osteoporosis per the local product label. Clinical sites include primary care and specialty practices. No clinical procedures, assessments, or changes to routine management of patients are required. Participants are followed for 24 months after study entry. We report results of a 12-month interim analysis. Study endpoints include persistence with denosumab at 12 months (defined as receipt of at least 2 injections no more than 6 months + 8 weeks apart); patient and physician attributes predicting persistence; and occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs). Persistence rates are based on total patient enrollment.

Results:

Enrollment was completed in April 2012 (N=935; US n=632; CAN n=303). Of 80 participating physicians (US n=54; CAN n=26), 41% in the US and 19% in CAN are rheumatologists. In the US, 76% of patients were ≥65 years of age at baseline, vs 62% in CAN. The mean (SD) Wolfe comorbidity index was 2.4 (2.0) in the US and 1.9 (1.6) in CAN. More than half of patients (53%) had osteoarthritis, 9% had rheumatoid arthritis, and 9% had other rheumatologic disorders. During the 5 years before enrollment, 92% of patients in both the US and CAN had taken a prescription osteoporosis therapy, and 59% (US 57%; CAN 62%) had used osteoporosis therapy >5 years before enrollment. Patients in the US took a mean (SD) of 8.4 (5.0) prescription medications, vs 5.7 (4.3) in CAN.

At 12 months, 82% of patients were persistent with denosumab (US, 79%; CAN 88%; Table). Several baseline factors in the US and one in CAN showed a statistically significant association with persistence (Table). Of the 118 patients (13%) who had discontinued the study at 12 months, 55 (6%) withdrew consent, 9 (1%) were lost to follow-up, 8 (1%) died, and 46 (5%) cited other reasons. SAEs were reported in 66 patients (7%); no SAEs of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), atypical femoral fracture, fracture healing complications, hypocalcemia, eczema, or hypersensitivity were reported. AEs of fracture were reported by 21 patients (2%).

Conclusion:

In this study of routine clinical practice, more than 80% of patients for whom denosumab was prescribed persisted on therapy at 12 months. Denosumab appears to be well tolerated; no new safety risks have been identified to date.


Disclosure:

S. L. Silverman,

Amgen Inc, Eli Lilly and Co. Medtronic, Pfizer,

2,

Amgen Inc., Genentech, Eli Lilly and Co., Novartis, Pfizer,

5,

Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly and Co., Pfizer,

8,

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Bone Center of Excellence,

3;

E. Siris,

Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer,

5,

Amgen, Lilly ,

8,

Governance Committee, National Bone Health Alliance,

6;

D. L. Kendler,

Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson Johnson,

2,

Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline,

5,

Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline,

8;

D. Belazi,

Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly and Co.,

5;

J. P. Brown,

Abbott, Amgen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, sanofi-aventis, Servier, Takeda, Warner Chilcott ,

2,

Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, sanofi-aventis, Warner Chilcott ,

5,

Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Merck ,

8;

D. T. Gold,

Lilly, Amgen,

5,

Lilly, Amgen,

8;

E. M. Lewiecki,

Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck,

2,

Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck,

5,

Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck,

8,

National Osteoporosis Foundation, United States Bone and Joint Initiative, International Society for Clinical Densitometry,

6,

New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center,

3;

A. Papaioannou,

Amgen, Warner Chilcott, Eli Lilly, Merck Frosst,

2,

Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck Frosst, Warner Chilcott ,

5,

Amgen, Warner Chilcott, Eli Lilly, Merck Frosst,

8;

C. Simonelli,

Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly and Co.,

2,

Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly and Co,

5,

Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly and Co,

8;

I. Ferreira,

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen Inc., Novartis,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

P. Dakin,

Amgen Inc.,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

S. Siddhanti,

Amgen Inc.,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

B. Stolshek,

Amgen Inc.,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

C. Recknor,

Ion Med Systems,

1,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/persistence-at-12-months-with-denosumab-prolia-in-postmenopausal-women-with-osteoporosis-interim-results-from-a-prospective-observational-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology