ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0577

Persistence and Effectiveness Across PsA Patient Subgroups with Guselkumab and IL-17 Inhibitors: 6-Month Results of the PsABIOnd Observational Study

Laure Gossec1, Mohamed Sharaf2, Xenofon Baraliakos3, mitsumasa kishimoto4, Ruben Queiro5, Ennio Lubrano6, Emmanouil Rampakakis7, László Köleséri8, Karissa Lozenski9, Enrique R. Soriano10, Proton Rahman11, Frank Behrens12 and Stefan Siebert13, 1Sorbonne Universite and Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France, 2Janssen - Johnson & Johnson, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 3Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany, 4Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 5Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo. Asturias, Spain, 6Department of Medicine, Università deglia Studi del Molise, CAMPOBASSO, Italy, 7JSS Medical Research, Montréal, QC, Canada, 8IQVIA, Budapest, Hungary, 9Johnson & Johnson, Horsham, PA, 10Rheumatology Section, Internal Medicine Service, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires and University Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 11Division of Rheumatology, Craig L. Dobbin Genetics Research Centre, Discipline of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada, 12Goethe-University & Fraunhofer ITMP, Frankfurt, Germany, 13University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Biologicals, Interleukins, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0554–0592) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of IL-23 inhibitors (i) and IL-17i in PsA; however, real-world data on their effectiveness in heterogeneous patient (pt) subgroups in routine care are limited. Some subgroups, such as older, obese, or biologic-experienced pts, are of particular interest as pts in these groups report worse treatment outcomes.1 The objective of the current analysis was to assess the 6-month persistence and effectiveness of guselkumab (GUS) and IL-17i across these subgroups of interest.

Methods: PsABIOnd (NCT05049798) is a global (20 countries) observational study in pts with PsA starting GUS or IL‑17i as 1st-to-4th line of biologic therapy per their standard of care.2 Here, the full population of the PsABIOnd study over 6 months of follow up was analyzed. Analyses were performed according to initial treatment group allocation in the overall population and in specific subgroups defined by baseline (BL) age, sex, BMI categories, and prior biologic use. Persistence on treatment (i.e., no stop/switch) over 6 months was assessed via the Kaplan-Meier estimator function. Propensity score (PS) analysis was used to evaluate hazard ratio (HR) of GUS vs IL-17i stop/switch prior to the 6-month visit, adjusting for BL variable imbalances across cohorts. Effectiveness was descriptively assessed using rates and means at BL and 6 months of the following measures: swollen (SJC66) and tender (TJC68) joint counts, clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA)-based low disease activity (LDA)/remission (REM; ≤13), the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI; 0-6), psoriasis body surface area (BSA)< 3%, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and number of nails affected by psoriatic disease (0-20). Dactylitis was not assessed due to the low prevalence of dactylitis at BL

Results: Of the 1134 pts analyzed, 555 and 579 pts received GUS or IL-17i, respectively, as their initial treatment. At BL, the GUS/IL-17i cohorts were generally well balanced across subgroups of interest: 83.4%/81.3% were < 65 years of age; 60.4%/59.2% were female; 48.0%/43.4% had BMI≥30 kg/m2; and 63.4%/62.3% had previously received ≥1 targeted therapy. Persistence on treatment up to 6 months was high in both cohorts, with 526/555 (94.8%) GUS and 539/579 (93.1%) IL-17i pts remaining on their initial treatment line at the 6-month visit (PS-adjusted HR of GUS vs IL-17i stop/switch [95% confidence interval]: 0.93 [0.75-1.16]; Fig 1). Persistence on GUS and IL-17i was also comparable in the different pt subgroups (data not shown). Across pt subgroups of interest, similar improvements in joint symptoms (SJC66; TJC68; cDAPSA LDA/REM; Fig 2A), enthesitis (LEI; Fig 2B), skin involvement (BSA< 3%; Fig 2C; DLQI), and psoriatic nail disease were observed with GUS and IL-17i at the 6-month visit.

Conclusion: Treatment with GUS or IL-17i resulted in comparable treatment persistence and effectiveness, regardless of age, sex, BMI, or treatment history, through 6 months. These results support the real-world effectiveness of GUS and IL-17i across PsA subpopulationsReferences1. Haddad. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2025;1527372. Siebert. Rheumatol Ther. 2023;10:489

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: L. Gossec: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, Biogen, 5, BMS, 2, Celltrion, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2, 5; M. Sharaf: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; X. Baraliakos: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid Instructor, Advanz, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Alexion, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Alphasigma, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Amgen, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, BMS, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Celgene, 6, Celltrion, 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Cesas, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Chugai, 2, 6, Clarivate, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Galapagos, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, J&J, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Merck, 6, MoonLake, 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid instructor, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Peervoice, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Pfizer, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Roche, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Sandoz, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Springer, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Stada, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Takeda, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, UCB, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Zuellig, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor; m. kishimoto: AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, 2, 6, Astellas, 2, 6, Ayumi, 2, 6, BMS, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Chugai, 2, 6, Daiichi-Sankyo, 2, 6, Eisai, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Johnson & Johnson, 2, 6, Kyowa Kirin, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Ono Pharma, 2, 6, Takeda, 2, 6, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; R. Queiro: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Johnson & Johnson, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6; E. Lubrano: AbbVie, 6, Amgen, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein, 6, Johnson & Johnson, 6, Novartis, 6, UCB, 6; E. Rampakakis: Johnson & Johnson, 2, JSS Medical Research, 3; L. Köleséri: IQVIA, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 2; K. Lozenski: BMS, 11, Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; E. Soriano: AbbVie, 5, 6, BMS, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 5, 6, GSK, 5, 6, J&J, 5, 6, Novartis, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, Raffo, 5, 6, UCB, 5, 6; P. Rahman: Abbott, 2, AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, BMS, 2, Celgene, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2; F. Behrens: AbbVie, 2, 6, BMS, 2, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Chugai, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Genzyme, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Johnson & Johnson, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 5, 6, Sanofi, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; S. Siebert: AbbVie, 6, Amgen, 6, AstraZeneca, 6, BMS, 5, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein, 5, Johnson & Johnson, 5, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6, Syncona, 6, Teijin Pharma, 6, UCB, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gossec L, Sharaf M, Baraliakos X, kishimoto m, Queiro R, Lubrano E, Rampakakis E, Köleséri L, Lozenski K, Soriano E, Rahman P, Behrens F, Siebert S. Persistence and Effectiveness Across PsA Patient Subgroups with Guselkumab and IL-17 Inhibitors: 6-Month Results of the PsABIOnd Observational Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/persistence-and-effectiveness-across-psa-patient-subgroups-with-guselkumab-and-il-17-inhibitors-6-month-results-of-the-psabiond-observational-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/persistence-and-effectiveness-across-psa-patient-subgroups-with-guselkumab-and-il-17-inhibitors-6-month-results-of-the-psabiond-observational-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology