ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 807

Perioperative Use Of Anti-Rheumatic Agents Does Not Increase Early Postoperative Infection Risks: A Veteran Affairs’ Administrative Database Study

Zaki AbouZahr1, Andrew Spiegelman2, Maria Cantu3 and Bernard Ng4, 1Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 2Michael E DeBakey Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, 3Baylor College Of Medicine, Houston, TX, 4Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic agents, DMARDs, Infection, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and surgery

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Safety Issues

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Evidences for perioperative management of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic agents (BA) are sparse, and limited mainly to methotrexate & specific surgeries (orthopedics). Such data may not be generalizable to other surgeries or DMARDs/BA. The use of administrative database is difficult here due to lack of validated methods to predict stopping of DMARDs/BA before surgery. Using novel techniques to predict stopping of DMARDs/BA, we used data from Veterans Affairs (VA) to compare infection risks of RA patients who stopped versus continued DMARDs/BA perioperatively over a 10-year period from 2000-2009.

Methods:

We identified 6548 RA patients in VA administrative databases using validated algorithms & included only those on 1 DMARD or BA in the perioperative period. Those on multiple DMARDs/BA were excluded to simplify result interpretation.

We predicted drug stoppages by calculating x = medication stop date closest to the surgery – next start date. y = surgery date-stop date was used to determine if the drug was stopped before or after surgery. To validate this method, two investigators independently reviewed clinic notes from the Houston VA facility for actual start or stop dates before or after surgery.  A third investigator reviewed and resolved conflicting chart review results. ROC analyses were performed to obtain optimal x and y values to distinguish if DMARDs/BA were stopped and if it occurred before or after surgery.

The primary endpoints were wound infections within 30 days of surgery, according to the modified 1992 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for postoperative infection, and other infections including pneumonia, UTI and sepsis. Propensity scores were used to match factors that may influence infection rates such as comorbidity scores, chronic steroid use, smoking, diabetes mellitus, etc.

Results:

In the validation part of the study, ROC analyses found that x≥33 days best predicted stoppage of DMARD/BA (AUC=0.954) and y≥-11 best predicted that DMARD/BA was stopped before surgery (AUC=0.846).

Risk of post-op general infection or wound infection in RA patients who stopped DMARDs/BA before surgery were not significantly different compared with those who did not stop these agents. Those who stopped BA after surgery had significantly higher odds of post-op wound (OR 13.7, p=0.014) and post-op general infections (OR 9.2, p=0.005) compared to those who did not stop BA. Similarly stopping DMARDs after surgery was associated with increased risk of post op wound infection (OR 3.08, p=0.000) and post op general infection (OR 1.68, p=0.024) compared with not stopping treatment. Treatment was stopped postoperatively likely because of post-operative infection. 

Conclusion:

Using our novel technique of identifying DMARDs/BA discontinuation, we showed that there was no significant difference in post-op infection risk whether stopping anti-rheumatic treatment preoperatively or not.  Our results grouped all types of surgeries and different DMARDs/BA. Further analyses looking at different types of surgeries and individual DMARDs/BA will be helpful to evaluate possible differences in infection risks between individual DMARDs/BA in different types of surgeries.


Disclosure:

Z. AbouZahr,
None;

A. Spiegelman,
None;

M. Cantu,
None;

B. Ng,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/perioperative-use-of-anti-rheumatic-agents-does-not-increase-early-postoperative-infection-risks-a-veteran-affairs-administrative-database-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology