ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2245

Periarticular Bone Mineral Density Predicts Structural Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis Independently of Static Alignment

Grace H. Lo1, Jeffrey B. Driban2, Lori Lyn Price3, Charles Eaton4, Michael T. Strayhorn5 and Timothy E. McAlindon6, 1VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety; Medical Care Line and Research Care Line; Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 2Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 3Clinical Care Research, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 4Center for Primary Care and Prevention, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, 5VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety; Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 6Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Alignment and osteoarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster III (ACR): Gout and Non-Inflammatory Musculoskeletal Conditions

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Individuals with a greater medial to lateral tibial periarticular bone mineral density (M:L paBMD) and static malalignment have greater risk for osteoarthritis (OA) progression.  As these risk factors are inter-related, we aimed to evaluate whether M:L paBMD is associated with OA progression, independent of static alignment, which would suggest bone as a therapeutic target.

Methods:  This was a study nested within two ancillary studies to the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI); therefore the visit for dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was the OAI 30 or 36 month visit, for static alignment was mostly the 12 month visit, and for OA progression (longitudinal medial joint space narrowing (mJSN)) between the 24 and 48 month visits.  Knee DXAs generated M:L paBMD using proprietary software.  Hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angles (static alignment) were measured on long limb films.  mJSN (OARSI grade) were assessed using PA semi-flexed radiographs.  Knees with 24-month mJSN of 3 were excluded as they were not eligible for mJSN worsening.

Only evaluating one knee per person, usually the right knee unless contraindicated, we generated Pearson’s correlations between HKA and M:L paBMD.  We also performed logistic regression with predictors of M:L pa BMD quartiles and outcomes of worsening of mJSN between the 24 and 48 month visits (including within OARSI grade worsening). Models were adjusted for HKA quartiles, age, sex, and BMI.  The Cochrane Armitage Test assessed for statistical significance of trends.  We performed a sensitivity analysis of only neutrally aligned knees, defined as HKA between -2° and 2°.

To further evaluate the influence of M:L paBMD, eliminating the influence of HKA, we used the residual of M:L paBMD regressed on HKA, representing the uncorrelated aspect of M:L paBMD unrelated to static alignment in logistic regression models.

Results: 419 participants were included, with a mean age of 63.8 +9.2 years; BMI of 29.4 +4.8 kg/m2; 52% male.  At the OAI 24 month visit, 60 (14%), 68 (16%), 158 (38%), 122 (29%), and 11 (3%) had Kellgren and Lawrence grades of 0 – 4 respectively.  45% of knees were neutrally aligned.

M:L paBMD and HKA were correlated; R = 0.64 (p<0.0001); greater M:L paBMD was associated with greater varus alignment.  Those with greater M:L paBMD had greater odds of mJSN progression, even in fully adjusted models (Table).  Sensitivity analyses of only neutrally aligned knees were similar.  Analyses evaluating M:L paBMD uncorrelated with HKA also supported a relationship with mJSN progression.

Table.  Relationship of ML:pa BMD with mJSN progression, crude and adjusted models.

 

 

Prevalence of mJSN progression

Unadjusted Odds Ratios

Adjusted

Odds Ratios1

Adjusted

Odds Ratios2

M:L pa BMD quartiles

Quartile 1 (lowest)

3/102 (2.9%)

Referent

Referent

Referent

Quartile 2

8/107 (7.5%)

2.7 (0.7 – 10.3)

1.7 (0.4 – 6.8)

1.5 (0.4 – 6.3)

Quartile 3

15/104 (14.4%)

5.6 (1.6 – 19.8)

3.1 (0.8 – 11.8)

2.8 (0.7 – 10.8)

Quartile 4 (highest)

30/106 (28.3%)

13.0 (3.8 – 44.3)

5.5 (1.5 – 20.6)

4.8 (1.2 – 18.6)

 

 

 

p for trend <0.0001

p for trend = 0.0006

p for trend = 0.002

1Adjusted for HKA quartiles

2Adjusted for HKA quartiles, age, sex, and BMI

Conclusion: Higher relative paBMD is associated with greater structural progression, even after adjustment for static alignment, a known correlate of periarticular BMD and predictor of progression. These findings suggest that treatments targeting periarticular bone, not focused solely on static realignment, may ultimately be protective of OA progression. 


Disclosure: G. H. Lo, None; J. B. Driban, None; L. L. Price, None; C. Eaton, None; M. T. Strayhorn, None; T. E. McAlindon, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lo GH, Driban JB, Price LL, Eaton C, Strayhorn MT, McAlindon TE. Periarticular Bone Mineral Density Predicts Structural Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis Independently of Static Alignment [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/periarticular-bone-mineral-density-predicts-structural-progression-of-knee-osteoarthritis-independently-of-static-alignment/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/periarticular-bone-mineral-density-predicts-structural-progression-of-knee-osteoarthritis-independently-of-static-alignment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology