ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 990

Performance of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinic Classification Criteria Versus the 1982 and Revised 1997 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Population-Based Study

Patompong Ungprasert1, Cynthia S. Crowson2 and Vaidehi Chowdhary1, 1Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Epidemiologic methods and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment I: Epidemiology and Prognosis

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with heterogeneous presentations. Therefore, classification criteria are required to help improve diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice and particularly in research. This study aimed to compare the performance of 1982 and revised 1997 ACR classification criteria to the newer 2012 SLICC classification criteria.

Methods: Potential cases of incident SLE from 1993 to 2005 in a predominantly Caucasian, geographically well-defined population were identified from the health-care network diagnostic codes. Comprehensive individual medical record review was performed to determine the presence or absence of the ACR and SLICC criteria. An incident case of SLE was defined as an individual who fulfilled at least 4 out of 11, 1982 or revised 1997 ACR criteria or met at least 4 SLICC criteria (with at least 1 clinical and 1 laboratory criteria) or had biopsy-proven lupus nephritis with positive ANA or ds-DNA and had been a resident for at least 1 year prior to the first physician diagnosis of SLE. Cases with isolated cutaneous lupus, drug-induced lupus and overlapping diseases were excluded. Overall incidence was age- and sex-adjusted to the 2000 US white population.

Results: There were 59 incident cases who fulfilled the SLICC criteria, corresponding to the adjusted incidence of 3.8 per 100,000 population (95% CI, 2.8 – 4.8). The incidence was significantly higher than that of the 1982 (45 cases; 2.9 per 100,000 population; p=0.004) and revised 1997 ACR criteria (46 cases; 2.9 per 100,000 population; p=0.046). The average age of 42.8 +/- 18.6 years in the SLICC cohort was not significantly different compared to 40.9 +/- 18.0 years in the 1982 ACR cohort and 41.1 +/- 17.9 years in the revised 1997 ACR cohort (p=0.11). Arthritis (56%), followed by acute cutaneous lupus (46%), renal involvement (25%) and serositis (24%) were the most frequently observed clinical criteria while positive ANA (93%), followed by positive ds-DNA (63%) and hypocomplementemia (36% for C3, 42% for C4 and 22% for total complement) were the most common immunologic criteria. Three cases were diagnosed based on renal biopsy and positive ANA or ds-DNA without fulfilling 4 out of 17 SLICC criteria.

Conclusion: The 2012 SLICC classification criteria may be more sensitive than the 1982 and revised 1997 ACR classification criteria in identifying patients with SLE at population level.


Disclosure: P. Ungprasert, None; C. S. Crowson, None; V. Chowdhary, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ungprasert P, Crowson CS, Chowdhary V. Performance of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinic Classification Criteria Versus the 1982 and Revised 1997 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Population-Based Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/performance-of-the-systemic-lupus-international-collaborating-clinic-classification-criteria-versus-the-1982-and-revised-1997-american-college-of-rheumatology-classification-criteria-for-systemic-lupu/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/performance-of-the-systemic-lupus-international-collaborating-clinic-classification-criteria-versus-the-1982-and-revised-1997-american-college-of-rheumatology-classification-criteria-for-systemic-lupu/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology