ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1373

Performance of CQR5 vs CQR19 in the Evaluation of Adherence to Tofacitinib in Daily Clinical Practice

Tatiana Barbich1, Osvaldo Luis Cerda 2, Emilce Schneeberger 3 and Gustavo Citera 4, 1Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2Instituto de Rehabilitacion Psicofisica, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 4Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tofacitinib

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II: Treatments, Outcomes, & Measures – ARP

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To evaluate the adherence to treatment with Tofacitinib in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) using both versions of the self-questionnaire Compliance Questionnaire Rheumatology: CQR19 and CQR5. Secondary objectives were to determine the variables associated with adherence to Tofacitinib and to compare the performance of both questionnaires.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out. We included patients ≥18 years old, with a diagnosis of RA according to ACR-EULAR 2010 criteria under treatment with Tofacitinib. Sociodemographic data and clinical disease characteristics, such as disease duration, Rheumatoid Factor and anti-CCP status, ESR (mm/h), CRP (mg/l) pain and global disease  assessment by Numerical Visual Scale (NVA), joint count (28), DAS28, presence and duration of morning stiffness were recorded. Previous treatments (b-DMARD and c-DMARD), concomitant treatments,date of beginning and dose of Tofacitinib (5 mg BID or 11 mg XR), date of discontinuation and its reasons (adverse events (AE) or lack of provision) were consigned. All patients completed self-questionnaires CQR19 and CQR5,  CQR19 includes 19 items evaluated by Likert scale of 4 points with a final value of 0 (no adherence) to 100 (perfect compliance). CQR5 is a simplified version, which includes 5 items of the original CQR19, and was previously validated. Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics. T-test or Mann Whitney to compare the continuous variables, Chi2 test or Fisher’s exact test to compare  the categorical ones. Kappa concordance index. Multiple logistic regression in order to determine variables associated with adherence.

Results: We included 52 patients, 82.7% women, with a median age (m) of 57.7 years, disease duration m 16 years. 63.5% had comorbiditiesand 27% were smokers. DAS28 m 2.25. 65.4% had received b-DMARD prior to Tofacitinib. 86.5% of the patients treated with Tofacitinib used 5 mg BID and 48% received Tofacitinib as monotherapy. In 52% the concomitant treatment was: Methotrexate 63% and Leflunomide 33.3%. The median time of Tofacitnib treatment was 13 months. 40,4% patients temporarily suspended treatment and in 50% of the cases, it was due to infections: 4 cases of Herpes Zoster, 4 lower urinary tract infections and 2 pneumonias acquired from the community and the rest of the cases for other reasons, such as scheduled surgeries and/or lack of provision. All the events were solved without complications. Only one patient permanently stopped treatment due to lack of provision. Median CQR19 was 89.5. The 84.6% had an adherence ≥ 80%. The variables significantly associated with adherence ≥ 80% were the presence of comorbidities [70.5% vs 29.5% (p = 0.014)] and older age (60 ± 9 years old vs. 45 ± 6 years old, p = 0.033). Using the CQR5, a similar percentage of patients (82.7%) were adherent, however, the concordance with CQR19 was low (ƙ: 0.227).In the multivariate analysis, older age was the only variable independently associated with greater treatment adherence [OR: 1.09 (95% CI 1.06-1.18), p = 0.037].

Conclusion: The treatment adherence of Tofacitinib was very good for both presentations. Older age was associated with higher adherence. The agreement between the questionnaires CQR19 and CQR5 was low.


Disclosure: T. Barbich, None; O. Cerda, None; E. Schneeberger, None; G. Citera, AbbVie, 5, 8, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, BMS, 5, BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB ARGENTINA, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, Gema Biotech, 2, 5, 8, Genzyme, 5, Janssen, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Sanofi Genzyme, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Barbich T, Cerda O, Schneeberger E, Citera G. Performance of CQR5 vs CQR19 in the Evaluation of Adherence to Tofacitinib in Daily Clinical Practice [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/performance-of-cqr5-vs-cqr19-in-the-evaluation-of-adherence-to-tofacitinib-in-daily-clinical-practice/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/performance-of-cqr5-vs-cqr19-in-the-evaluation-of-adherence-to-tofacitinib-in-daily-clinical-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology