ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2267

Percentage of Women Achieving Non-Osteoporotic BMD T-Scores at the Spine and Hip over 8 Years of Denosumab Treatment

S. Ferrari1, C. Libanati2, C.J.F Lin2, S. Adami3, J.P. Brown4, F. Cosman5, E. Czerwinski6, L.H. de Gregório7, J. Malouf8, J.-Y. Reginster9, N.S. Daizadeh2, A. Wang2, R.B. Wagman2, E.M. Lewiecki10 and S. Cummings11, 1Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland, 2Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 3University of Verona, Verona, Italy, 4Laval University and CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 5Helen Hayes Hospital, West Haverstraw, NY, 6Krakow Medical Center, Krakow, Poland, 7CCBR, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 8Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 9University of Liège, Liège, Belgium, 10New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, 11San Francisco Coordinating Center, CPMC Research Institute, and UCSF, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Denosumab and osteoporosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease - Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis: Osteoporosis: Treatment, Safety, and Long Term Outcomes

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Guidelines for the treatment of chronic conditions such as hypertension and diabetes include specific biomarker targets. This differs from osteoporosis treatment guidelines, which currently do not define treatment targets or goals. In general, absence of BMD loss and absence of fracture are considered treatment successes. This is far from ideal because success defined by the lack of a negative outcome does not set a real goal for therapy. Potential goals for osteoporosis treatment might include reaching a BMD T‑score value somewhere above –2.5 which represents an acceptable level of fracture risk. To provide insight into T-score values achieved over time with denosumab (DMAb), we report on the percentage of women who achieved a range of possible target BMD T-scores at both the lumbar spine and total hip over 8 years of treatment.

Methods: For these analyses, women received 3 years of DMAb (60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months) during FREEDOM and 5 years of DMAb during the Extension for a total of 8 years of continued treatment. The percentage of women with T-scores > -2.5, > -2.2, > -2.0, and > -1.8 at both the lumbar spine and total hip, and T-scores > -2.5 at either the lumbar spine or total hip at baseline and over 8 years of DMAb treatment were determined. The influence of baseline T‑score on subsequent T-score improvement was also explored.

Results: At FREEDOM baseline, mean (standard deviation) lumbar spine and total hip T-scores were -2.83 (0.67) and -1.85 (0.79), respectively, for the DMAb Extension participants (N = 2,343). The percentage of women with T‑scores > -2.5, > -2.2, > -2.0, and > -1.8 at both the lumbar spine and total hip progressively increased from baseline over 8 years of DMAb treatment as follows: 11% to 82% (> -2.5), 4% to 65% (> -2.2), 2% to 53% (> -2.0), and 1% to 39% (> -1.8) (Fig. 1). At individual sites, the percentage of women with a T‑score > –2.5 increased from baseline over 8 years of DMAb treatment from 19% to 86% (lumbar spine) and from 75% to 94% (total hip). Baseline T‑scores by quartile remained largely consistent throughout the 8 years of DMAb treatment, which showed similar trajectory in BMD across subjects regardless of initial BMD (not shown).

Conclusion: DMAb enables a substantial proportion of women with osteoporosis to achieve non-osteoporotic T‑scores. The data reported here contribute insightful information to discussions on the topic of treatment goals for osteoporosis.


Disclosure:

S. Ferrari,

Amgen Inc., MSD,

2,

Amgen Inc., MSD, Lilly, GSK, Bioiberica,

5;

C. Libanati,

Amgen Inc.,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

C. J. F. Lin,

Amgen Inc.,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

S. Adami,

Merck, Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly, Abiogen, AbbVie,

5;

J. P. Brown,

Actavis, Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis,

2,

Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly,

5,

Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly,

8;

F. Cosman,

Amgen Inc., Lilly, Merck,

2,

Lilly, Amgen Inc., Merck, Pfizer,

5,

Lilly, Amgen Inc.,

8;

E. Czerwinski,

Amgen Inc., Pfizer,

2,

Servier, Roche, Amgen Inc.,

9;

L. H. de Gregório,

Amgen Inc., Merck, Jansen,

2,

GSK,

8;

J. Malouf,

Amgen Inc., and Eli Lilly,

5,

Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly,

8;

J. Y. Reginster,

Servier, Novartis, Negma, Lilly, Wyeth, Amgen Inc., GlaxoSmithKiine, Roche, Merckle, Nycomed-Takeda, NPS, IBSA-Genevrier, Theramex, UCB, Asahi Kasei,

5,

Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Rottapharm, Teva, Roche, Amgen Inc., Lilly, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKiine, Servier, Pfizer, Theramex, Danone, Organon, Therabel, Boehringer, Chiltern, Galapagos,

2,

Merck Sharp and Dohme, Lilly, Rottapharm, IBSA, Genevrier, Novartis, Servier, Roche, GlaxoSmithKiine, Merckle, Teijin, Teva, Analis, Theramex, Nycomed, NovoNordisk, Ebewee Pharma, Zodiac, Danone, Will Pharma,

9;

N. S. Daizadeh,

Amgen Inc.,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

A. Wang,

Amgen Inc.,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

R. B. Wagman,

Amgen Inc.,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

E. M. Lewiecki,

Amgen Inc., Merck, Lilly,

2,

Amgen Inc., Merck, Lilly, Radius Helath, AgNovos,

5;

S. Cummings,

Amgen Inc., Merck, Lilly,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/percentage-of-women-achieving-non-osteoporotic-bmd-t-scores-at-the-spine-and-hip-over-8-years-of-denosumab-treatment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology