ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1235

Perceived Stress and Fatigue in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Patricia P. Katz1, Desiree R Azizoddin2 and Meenakshi Jolly3, 1Medicine/Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2Department of Medicine and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University, Chicago, IL, 3Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: depression, Fatigue, patient-reported outcome measures, stress and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Fatigue is a common and often severe symptom among individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Yet, there is an incomplete understanding of the causes of fatigue. We examined perceived stress and depressive symptoms as potential predictors of fatigue in a large cohort of individuals with SLE.

Methods: Data from two years of the Lupus Outcomes Study (n = 650), obtained through annual structured telephone interviews, were used. All participants had physician-confirmed SLE. Fatigue was measured with the SF-36 Vitality scale (reversed); scores ranged from 0 – 100, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue. The following additional measures were also administered: 4-item Cohen Perceived Stress scale (PS), Centers for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CESD); Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ, self-reported disease activity), and Brief Index of Lupus Damage (BILD; self-reported lupus damage). Cross-sectional multivariate linear regression analyses examined the association of CESD and PS on fatigue. Longitudinal analyses were then conducted to identify predictors of increases in fatigue. Three longitudinal regression models were constructed. The first examined the association of CESD at time 1 (T1) with fatigue at time 2 (T2), controlling for T1 fatigue, age, sex, disease duration, SLAQ, BILD, comorbid conditions, self-report of fibromyalgia, obesity, and pain (SF-36 Pain subscale). The second model then added PS at T1, and the third added decrease in PS from T1 to T2.

Results: Sample characteristics are shown in Table 1. In cross-sectional analyses, both CESD and PS were significantly associated with fatigue (Table 2). In longitudinal analyses, T1 CESD was a significant independent predictor of T2 fatigue (Table 2, Model 1). When T1 PS was added (Model 2), PS was a significant predictor of T2 fatigue but CESD was no longer significant. The further addition of T1-T2 decrease in PS increased the predictive power of the mode (Model 3), and decline in PS was associated with a significant decrease in fatigue.

Conclusion: Both depressive symptoms and perceived stress were associated with concurrent fatigue. While depressive symptoms initially predicted subsequent increases fatigue, the effects were mediated by perceived stress. Furthermore, a decrease in perceived stress was associated with a decrease in fatigue. These results suggest that perceived stress plays an important role in SLE fatigue and may be an important focus of interventions to reduce fatigue.

Table 1. Characteristics of sample, n = 650

Mean ± SD

% (n)

Age

52.7 ± 12.4

Female

92 (598)

T1 SLE activity (0 – 10)

4.1 ± 2.7

T1 BILD (0 – 12)

2.2 ± 2.0

T1 Pain (0 – 100)*

41.9 ± 11.2

T1 CES-D score

13.7 ± 12.1

T1 Fatigue (0 – 100)

54.8 ± 23.9

T1 Perceived stress score (0 – 16)

5.2 ± 3.5

T1-T2 decline in stress (≥ 2 points)

26.6 (173)

* Lower scores reflect higher pain

Table 2. Multivariate analysis results

Cross-sectional analysis

Longitudinal analysis

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

CESD

0.66 (<.0001)

T1 CESD

0.14 (0.04)

-0.03 (0.77)

-0.08 (.38)

Perceived stress

0.75 (.005)

T1 perceived stress

—

0.8 (.002)

1.57 (<.0001)

T1-T2 decrease in perceived stress

—

—

-10.78 (<.0001)

Model R2

0.64

Model R2

0.58

0.58

0.62

• Tabled values are beta (p-value) from multivariate linear regression analysis

• Cross-sectional analyses controlled for T1 age, sex, disease duration, self-reported disease activity and damage, pain, comorbid conditions, self-report of fibromyalgia, and obesity.

• Longitudinal analyses controlled for the above plus T1 fatigue.


Disclosure: P. P. Katz, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2; D. R. Azizoddin, None; M. Jolly, Pfizer Inc, 2,Medimmune, celgene, boehringer ingelheim, aurinia,, 7.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Katz PP, Azizoddin DR, Jolly M. Perceived Stress and Fatigue in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/perceived-stress-and-fatigue-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/perceived-stress-and-fatigue-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology