ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2613

Patterns of Medication Use in a Validated Cohort of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Patients

Madeline J. Epsten1, Lisa A. Mandl1, Jackie Szymonifka2 and Sergio Schwartzman1, 1Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, methotrexate (MTX), Psoriatic arthritis, spondylarthritis and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  There is currently a lack of consensus among experts on the optimal therapeutic management of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). EULAR and GRAPPA recommendations support initial treatment with classic synthetic (cs)DMARDs. Recently the American College of Rheumatology /National Psoriasis foundation have presented draft recommendations suggesting that treatment naïve patients with active PsA be treated with anti-TNF agents first. In clinical practice it is assumed that treatment with a csDMARD, usually methotrexate (MTX), precedes therapy with biologic agents. In this analysis we evaluated whether the current pattern of PsA treatment in a validated academic cohort of PsA patients begins with MTX.

Methods: All patients with ICD-9 or -10 codes for PsA seen at a single academic center between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016 were identified. Patients who met CASPAR classification criteria and consented were enrolled. Patients were sent a survey eliciting date of PsA diagnosis, medication use, efficacy of therapy and reason for stopping medications.

Results: 161/336 (47.9%) of patients completed the survey: mean age 58.3 years (range 22-100), 50.3% female, 88.2% white, 3.4% Hispanic. 64.6% had been on MTX at some point in time and of these, 32.4% were currently using MTX. 35.4% had never been on MTX. 88.2% of patients who took MTX received it without ever being prescribed a biologic or prior to starting a biologic; of these 36.6% were never prescribed a biologic. Of the patients still on MTX, 84.4% took MTX orally and 15.6% via injection, with a mean oral MTX dose of 15.3mg weekly (range 2.5-25). 83.9% of patients who were currently taking MTX believed it helped their PsA, and 43.1% of patients who stopped MTX believed it had helped their PsA. Overall 77.6% of patients who were once on MTX discontinued; 46.4% because MTX was ineffective and 40.6% because of side effects, fatigue being the most frequent (See Table 2). 26.1% of patients had at some point been on a non-MTX csDMARD. 65.2% of patients had been on a biologic agent at some point in time, and of these 56.2% have taken ≥2 biologic agents. 48.4% of patients were currently taking a biologic agent.

Conclusion: Nearly 9 out of 10 patients in an academic PsA Registry received MTX prior to a biologic, and 32.4% of MTX users remained on it. Interestingly, among those who discontinued, 43.1% believed it helped their PsA. These patterns suggest a benefit from MTX, and that even in a center where patients and physicians have access to biologics, MTX remains standard of care as initial therapy. Given the lower cost and patient self-report of benefit, in selected patients MTX should remain a first-line treatment.


Disclosure: M. J. Epsten, None; L. A. Mandl, None; J. Szymonifka, None; S. Schwartzman, Amgen Inc., 1,Boston Scientific, 1,Gilead, 1,Medtronic, 1,AbbVie Inc., 5,Genentech, Inc., 5,Janssen, 5,Lilly, 5,Novartis, 5,Pfizer, Inc., 5,Regeneron, 5,Sanofi, 5,UCB, Inc., 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Epsten MJ, Mandl LA, Szymonifka J, Schwartzman S. Patterns of Medication Use in a Validated Cohort of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patterns-of-medication-use-in-a-validated-cohort-of-psoriatic-arthritis-psa-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patterns-of-medication-use-in-a-validated-cohort-of-psoriatic-arthritis-psa-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology