ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1030

Patterns in the Prescription, the Denials of Coverage, and the Delays in Dispensation of Janus Kinase Inhibitors

Thomas Riley1, Igor Dombrovsky2, Michael George3 and Joshua Baker3, 1Hopsital of the University of Pennsylvania, Springfield, PA, 2Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, 3University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Administrative Data, Demographics, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Disparities, race/ethnicity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1013–1032) Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster II: Socioeconomic Determinants

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have therapeutic benefits in autoimmune conditions. Access to these medications is controlled by insurance carriers through requirements for prior authorizations and the use of restricted formularies which are difficult to navigate and may lead to denials of coverage and/or delays in dispensation.This study sought to characterize the real-word coverage denials and delays in dispensation of JAKi in patients with rheumatologic diseases, hypothesizing that there would be differences in denials of prescriptions and delays in dispensation related to drug type, race, and insurance status.

Methods: A retrospective cohort was created from patients at an academic tertiary care rheumatology practice who were prescribed a JAKi between 2014 and 2023. Patients were included in this analysis if they had a documented visit with a rheumatologist documented in the electronic health record (EHR) and for the initial prescription of a JAKi (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib) but did not include patients renewing an existing prescription. Patients were selected irrespective of underlying disease. Demographics and current/prior disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) use were extracted from the EHR. To provide confirmation of insurance approval and determine the time to dispensation, pharmacy and nursing-based communications related to the processing of prior authorization and coordination with specialty pharmacies were also extracted from the EHR.

Results: We identified a total of 118 new prescriptions for JAKi among 90 patients (81 tofacitinib, 36 upadacitinib, 1 baricitinib).Of these 118 prescriptions, 10 (8%) had coverage denied by insurance, and 5 (4%) were not dispensed for other reasons [2 were limited by co-pay, 1 changed insurance, 1 developed a severe infection, and 1 opted not to start due to personal preferences]. Patients with an approved prescription experienced, on average, an 18-day delay [IQR 6-22] between initial prescription and dispensing of a JAKi. 14 prescriptions (11%) had delays longer than 30 days. Patients who were Black experienced a longer delay in initial dispensing compared to those who were Non-Hispanic White (30.6 vs 15.8, p = 0.013). Comparing private vs public insurance, there were not differences in rates of coverage denial (10% vs 7%, p = 0.61), nor were there differences in delays in dispensation (21.3 vs 16.7, p = 0.32). There were not differences in delays in dispensation for tofactinib compared to upadacitinib (19.8 vs 15.2, p =0.34).

Conclusion: While rates of coverage denial of JAKi were low, there was an average delay in dispensing prescriptions of 18 days. Patients who were Black experienced an almost 2-fold longer delay in dispensing of JAKi compared to those who identified as Non-Hispanic White. Further evaluation is needed to identify the potential factors at play contributing to this observed disparity and the key drivers of delays in medication dispensing.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. In evaluating the delays from time to prescription to time to dispensation, there were no significant differences comparing tofacitinib to upadacitinib (19.8 vs 15.2, p =0.34) or the insurance type the patient was enrolled in (16.7 vs 21.3, p = 0.32). However, patients who were Black experienced a longer delay in initial dispensation compared to those who were Non-Hispanic White (30.6 vs 15.8, p = 0.013)


Disclosures: T. Riley: None; I. Dombrovsky: None; M. George: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5, Janssen, 5; J. Baker: CorEvitas, 2, Cumberland Pharma, 2, Horizon Pharmaceuticals, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Riley T, Dombrovsky I, George M, Baker J. Patterns in the Prescription, the Denials of Coverage, and the Delays in Dispensation of Janus Kinase Inhibitors [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patterns-in-the-prescription-the-denials-of-coverage-and-the-delays-in-dispensation-of-janus-kinase-inhibitors/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patterns-in-the-prescription-the-denials-of-coverage-and-the-delays-in-dispensation-of-janus-kinase-inhibitors/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology