ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3053

Patients Treated for Behcet Syndrome in the US Have Higher Disease Activity Scores at Presentation If They Fulfill ISG Criteria and If They Are Females, However Have Less Severe Disease Overall

Yusuf Yazici, Hannah Bernstein and Christopher Swearingen, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Behcet's syndrome and Disease Activity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Vasculitis Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Diagnosis of Behcet’s syndrome (BS) is based on clinical signs and symptoms, without the use laboratory or imaging tests and the most commonly used diagnostic criteria are the ISG criteria. Patients have also been diagnosed with BS not meeting ISBD criteria based on the clinical impression of the treating physicians. 

Objective: 

To determine differences in disease activity among BS patients meeting and not meeting the ISBD criteria.

Methods:

Behcet’s patients seen at the NYU Behcet’s Center had their demographic, clinical features and outcomes data abstracted. Confirmed BS diagnosis was determined if ISG criteria were met at any time during the course of observation.  Multiple linear regression estimated any association between meeting ISG criteria and gender with the patient-reported outcomes Behcet’s Syndrome Activity Score (BSAS), Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Fatigue VAS, Patient Global Assessment VAS, and RAPID3 as well as Physician Global Assessment VAS. 

Results:

First observation data on 832 subjects were abstracted for this analysis. 504 (63%) met ISG criteria for Behcet’s, 616 (74%) were female with an average age of 35 years (+ 13.8). Mean scores for BSAS, pain, fatigue, patient global, RAPID3 and physician global were uniformly higher in those meeting criteria vs not meeting criteria. Meeting ISG criteria was significantly associated with increases in all clinical outcomes independently of gender, ranging from 5 points on the Physician Global VAS to 13 points on the Fatigue VAS (Table). Conversely, female gender was only associated with significant increases in BSAS, Fatigue and RAPID3 independent of meeting ISG criteria. Not surprising, meeting ISG criteria was associated with increased odds of eye involvement; CNS or vascular involvement were not associated with meeting ISG criteria, however. Notably, males [N=63 (29%)] were are significantly increased odds of having eye involvement compared to females [N=155 (25%)] [OR=1.6, 95% CI:1.11, 2.41), P=0.013] independent of meeting ISG criteria, race, age and education. No association between gender and CNS [males N=12 (10%) vs female N=45 (12%)] or vascular involvement [males N=3 (2%) vs female N=3 (1%)] was detected.

Conclusion:

Behcet’s patients who fulfill ISG criteria have more active disease, based on all measures of disease activity, including patient and physician based outcomes. Interestingly, females were also at risk for more active disease as measured by composite patient reported outcome measures, reflecting possibly the different character of Behcet’s in non-endemic areas, such as the US. Males were more likely to have eye involvement, suggesting that even though females may have more activity overall, males may have more severe disease.

Table. Change in Outcomes Associated with Criteria and Gender

Met Behcets Criteria

Gender

Outcomes*

N

Yes

No

P†

Female

Male

P†

BSAS

832

47.0 (21.6)

33.6 (19.3)

<0.001

 

43.8 (21.4)

36.9 (21.9)

0.001

Function

784

17.8 (19.8)

8.8 (13.5)

<0.001

14.7 (18.2)

13.8 (18.4)

0.720

Fatigue VAS

812

55.2 (34.0)

41.1 (35.1)

<0.001

52.7 (34.2)

42.4 (36.6)

<0.001

Pt Global VAS

810

49.2 (29.2)

38.1 (29.0)

<0.001

46.3 (29.5)

41.7 (29.6)

0.052

MD Global VAS

781

27.5 (13.2)

22.5 (13.1)

<0.001

25.6 (12.4)

25.8 (15.8)

0.385

RAPID3

768

40.5 (24.0)

29.3 (22.1)

<0.001

 

37.6 (23.6)

32.5 (24.6)

0.008

*All outcomes are scaled [0-100].

†P-values reported from multiple linear regression modeling independent association with Criteria Status, Gender, Race, Age and Formal Education Level as covariates.


Disclosure: Y. Yazici, BMS, Celgene, 5,BMS, Celgene, 2; H. Bernstein, None; C. Swearingen, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Yazici Y, Bernstein H, Swearingen C. Patients Treated for Behcet Syndrome in the US Have Higher Disease Activity Scores at Presentation If They Fulfill ISG Criteria and If They Are Females, However Have Less Severe Disease Overall [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patients-treated-for-behcet-syndrome-in-the-us-have-higher-disease-activity-scores-at-presentation-if-they-fulfill-isg-criteria-and-if-they-are-females-however-have-less-severe-disease-overall/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patients-treated-for-behcet-syndrome-in-the-us-have-higher-disease-activity-scores-at-presentation-if-they-fulfill-isg-criteria-and-if-they-are-females-however-have-less-severe-disease-overall/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology