ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2956

Patients’ Reported Perceived Deficits Questionnaire – 5-Item Is Not Valid to Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Lupus

Stephanie Nantes1, Murray Urowitz2, Dafna Gladman2, Ashneet Dhaliwal1 and Zahi Touma2, 1University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: SLE and cognitive dysfunction

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster Session III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: It is unclear whether cognitive
complaints in patients with SLE are indicative of true Cognitive Impairment
(CI) or underlying depression or anxiety.

To
determine: 1) the validity of the patient-reported outcome on CI (Perceived
Deficits Questionnaire – 5-item [PDQ-5]) and 2) the association of PDQ-5 with
self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety.

Methods:
Consecutive
patients followed at a single centre and seen between Feb 2014 and May 2015 that agreed to participate
were included in this study. Patients
completed PDQ-5, which assessed perceived cognitive deficits from the patient’s
perspective. PDQ-5 included five questions representing four subscales:
Attention/Concentration, Retrospective Memory, Prospective Memory, and
Planning/Organization. Total PDQ-5 score consists of the sum of the raw scores on
these 5 items and could range from 0-20 with higher scores indicating greater
perceived deficit.

Patients
underwent two cognitive screening tests by two trained assessors: Hopkins
Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) via telephone interview and MoCA via
face-to-face assessment. Patients
also completed Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI).

Prevalence
of self-reported cognitive deficits (PDQ-5), depression and anxiety were
determined and scores from these questionnaires were compared in patients with
and without CI (based on HVLT-R). Sensitivity
(Se)/specificity (Sp) and Positive Predictive Value (PPV)/Negative Predictive
Value (NPV) of PDQ-5 in detecting CI (based
on HVLT-R and MoCA), depression (CES-D)
and anxiety (BAI) were studied.

Results:
Of 71 patients, 46%
self-reported cognitive difficulties occurring ‘often’ or ‘almost always’ in at
least one of PDQ-5’s four subscales. 45% reported depressive symptoms by CES-D,
and 24% reported moderate-severe anxiety by BAI.

CES-D
showed higher scores in CI patients compared to those without CI (22.1±13.7 vs. 15.9±10.6, p=0.02)
[higher scores = more depressive symptoms]. There were no significant
differences in BAI or PDQ-5 scores between patients with and without CI.

Se, Sp,
PPV and NPV were high in both CES-D (Se 69%, Sp 75%, PPV 63%, NPV 79%) and BAI
(Se 94%, Sp 69%, PPV 48%, NPV 97%) signifying that PDQ-5 is detecting anxiety
and depression.

PDQ-5 was
less predictive of objective CI (MoCA: Se 58%, Sp 60%, PPV 53%, NPV 65%;
HVLT-R: Se 48%, Sp 52%, PPV 41%, NPV 59%) (Table 1)

 

TABLE
1. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NNP of PDQ-5 in detecting CI (HVLT-R and
MoCA),
depression
(
CES-D) and anxiety (BAI)

 

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

PPV (%)

NPV (%)

MoCA

58

60

53

65

HVLT-R

48

52

41

59

BAI

94

69

48

97

CES-D

69

75

63

79

Conclusion:
The PDQ-5
self-report questionnaire is not a valid test to screen for CI in SLE. Depression and anxiety among SLE
patients was highly prevalent using CES-D (46%) and BAI (24%) and depression
was associated with CI. Patients’ cognitive complaints reported in PDQ-5 scores
were not reliably associated with performance on MoCA or HVLT-R, but rather were influenced by the presence
of depression and anxiety.

 


Disclosure: S. Nantes, None; M. Urowitz, None; D. Gladman, None; A. Dhaliwal, None; Z. Touma, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nantes S, Urowitz M, Gladman D, Dhaliwal A, Touma Z. Patients’ Reported Perceived Deficits Questionnaire – 5-Item Is Not Valid to Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Lupus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patients-reported-perceived-deficits-questionnaire-5-item-is-not-valid-to-screen-for-cognitive-impairment-in-lupus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patients-reported-perceived-deficits-questionnaire-5-item-is-not-valid-to-screen-for-cognitive-impairment-in-lupus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology