ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2644

Patient Survey Regarding Generic and Bio-Similar Drugs

Tsukasa Matsubara1, Tamami Yoshitama1, Kou Katayama1, Shigehito Kiyokawa2, Nobumasa Miyake2, Motohiro Oribe2, Akira Sagawa2 and Keiko Funahashi3, 1Japanese clinician biologics research group, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 2Japanese clinician biologics research group, Kobe, Japan, 3Clinical Research, Matsubara Mayflower Hospital, Kato, Japan

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: biosimilars, genetics and patient questionnaires

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

In Japan the market share for generic drugs is 50%, lower than that in Western nations. This is partially due to Japan’s insurance system, but the reasons why the patients themselves turn down the opportunity to switch to a generic drug when asked at the pharmacy are not clear. In addition, the use of bio-similar drugs became possible in Japan in September of 2015, but the degree of knowledge that patients have regarding them is unknown. Therefore we carried out a patient survey about generic and bio-similar drugs.

 

Methods:

The survey was carried out amongst patients being treated at research group member facilities. It was an anonymous written survey. After the section on patient background (age, gender, disease history) was completed, patients were asked their impressions of generic drugs, their attitudes towards changing to a generic, whether or not they had ever experienced an adverse effect with a generic drug, what knowledge they had regarding bio-similar drugs, and if they had any interest in or experience with using bio-similar drugs. This research and survey was conducted with the approval of the ethics committee.

 

Results:

Participants were from 20 facilities, 2384 patients, 83% female, with those in their 60s the majority. Many, 43%, had a disease history of over 10 years. Their impressions of generic drugs were equally good and bad, 45% each. However, those that had a bad experience with a generic (lessening of effect or an adverse event) only comprised 7%, leading to the conclusion that the bad impressions were not the result of experience. Regarding the choice of bio-similar drugs, 14% percent had heard of them, and about half stated no interest in bio-similar drugs, even after seeing explanatory materials. Regarding changing to a bio-similar drug, 70% said they would rely on the opinion of their physician. 11% of participants answered that they would switch for the cost benefits.In a recent online survey, approximately 28% of physicians expressed a desire to use generic drugs, while 65% of patients expressed interest in using them, showing a gap between the two groups. In the current survey we found that there is anxiety regarding adverse events, and that resistance to a change in medication is more common in RA patients than with those of other illnesses. These factors may explain the tendency of RA patients to leave the decision of whether to use a bio-similar drug up to the physician instead of choosing one themselves.

Conclusion:

There is not enough education regarding switching to generic drugs and bio-similar drugs. The authors recommend that new avenues of patient education be explored, in order to help patients feel competent in making decisions about their medications.


Disclosure: T. Matsubara, None; T. Yoshitama, None; K. Katayama, None; S. Kiyokawa, None; N. Miyake, None; M. Oribe, None; A. Sagawa, None; K. Funahashi, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Matsubara T, Yoshitama T, Katayama K, Kiyokawa S, Miyake N, Oribe M, Sagawa A, Funahashi K. Patient Survey Regarding Generic and Bio-Similar Drugs [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-survey-regarding-generic-and-bio-similar-drugs/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-survey-regarding-generic-and-bio-similar-drugs/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology