ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2269

Patient Reported Pain: A Predictor Of Outcomes In Rheumatoid Arthritis From The Consortium Of Rheumatology Researchers Of North America Registry

Dimitrios A. Pappas1, Chitra K. Karki2, Chin Lee3, George W. Reed4, Ping He5 and Sarah Al Sawah3, 1Columbia University, New York, NY, 2Corrona, LLC., Southborough, MA, 3Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 4CORRONA, Inc., Southborough, MA, 5UMASS Medical School, Worcester, MA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, pain and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis-Clinical Aspects III: Outcome Measures, Socioeconomy, Screening, Biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  Pain is a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The extent to which patient reported pain in RA is related to patterns of biologic treatment switching, change in physical function or work productivity has not been adequately explored. Understanding the impact of patient reported pain on these parameters has clinical relevance in the management of RA.

Objective: To investigate the impact of patient reported pain on biologic treatment switching, change in physical function and work productivity in patients with RA participating in the CORRONA registry.

Methods:  The CORRONA registry is a network of rheumatology practices across the U.S. with patient and physician reported data on more than 30,000 patients with RA. To be included in the analysis, patients with RA had to initiate a biologic agent and remain on stable background RA therapy (no dose adjustments, discontinuations, additions or switching) for 6 months. Pain was assessed using a numeric rating scale from 0-10 with 10 defined as “pain as bad as it could be”. Pain levels reported at the visit following 6 months of stable RA therapy served as the baseline visit for the analysis. Outcomes assessed during the 12 month follow up period or at the 12 month follow up visit included: 1) frequency of biologic treatment switching; 2) frequency of biologic treatment switching due to inefficacy; 3) change from baseline in physical function as measured by the modified health assessment questionnaire (mHAQ); and 4) days lost from work due to RA. Separate multivariate analyses were performed for each outcome. Covariates considered for adjustment were age, gender, race, education status, smoking status, insurance status, baseline clinical disease activity index (CDAI), disease duration, baseline mHAQ, and comorbidities. Covariates were included in the model if they were biologically plausible and significantly associated with the outcome of interest in bivariate evaluations.

Results:  1180 patients with RA met the eligibility criteria and had a 12 month follow up visit after baseline. The majority were females (77.9%) and Caucasian (84.7%) with a mean age of 57.4 (SD ±12.4) years, mean pain 3.1 (SD ±2.5); mean disease duration 11.5 (SD ±9.9) years, mean CDAI 11.45 (SD ±10.7), and mean mHAQ score 0.4 (SD ±0.5). More than half had a college or university education while a small percentage reported smoking (16.8%). The most common comorbidities reported were history of malignancies (16.5%), cardiovascular disease (7.7%), peptic ulcer (7.3%) and diabetes (7.2%).

The adjusted association between patient reported pain and outcomes of interest are shown in Table 1. Odds Ratios (OR), Relative Risk Ratios (RRR) and Coefficients refer to change in outcome associated with a one unit increase in patient reported pain.

Conclusion:  Patient reported pain in RA patients is associated with biologic treatment switches, reduction in function, and days lost from work.


Disclosure:

D. A. Pappas,

CORRONA Inc,

3,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

5,

Columbia University,

6;

C. K. Karki,

Corrona, Inc.,

3;

C. Lee,

Eli Lilly and Company,

1,

Eli Lilly and Company,

3;

G. W. Reed,

CORRONA , Inc.,

3;

P. He,

UMASS Medical School,

3;

S. Al Sawah,

Eli Lilly and Company,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-reported-pain-a-predictor-of-outcomes-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-from-the-consortium-of-rheumatology-researchers-of-north-america-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology