ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 423

Patient Reported Outcomes over 2 Years in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Initiating Treatment with 1st, 2nd or 3rd TNF Inhibitor in Routine Care – Was PRO Remission Achieved? Results from the EuroSpA Collaboration

Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg1, Lennart Jacobsson 2, Anne Gitte Loft 3, Florenzo Iannone 4, Michael J. Nissen 5, Eirik Kristianslund 6, Herman Mann 7, Maria José Santos 8, Manuel Pombo-Suarez 9, Kari K. Eklund 10, Ziga Rotar 11, Bjorn Gudbjornsson 12, Mehmet Akif Öztürk 13, Catalin Codreanu 14, Marleen van de Sande 15, Johan Wallman 16, Ennio Giulio Favalli 17, Burkhard Moeller 18, Joe Sexton 19, Karel Pavelka 7, Elsa Vieira-Sousa 20, Carlos Sánchez-Piedra 21, Nina Trokovic 22, Matija Tomsic 23, Thorvardur J Love 24, Ayşe Cefle 25, Ruxandra IONESCU 26, Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma 15, Gareth Jones 27, Cecilie Heegaard Brahe 28, Merete Lund Hetland 1 and Mikkel Østergaard 29, 1DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2Dept of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden,, Gothenburg, Sweden, 3Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital., Aarhus, Denmark, 4Department of Emergency and Transplantation , Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital of Bari, Bari, Italy., Bari, Italy, 5University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, 6Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway., Oslo, Norway, 7Institute of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic, Prague 2, Czech Republic, 8Rheumatology department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal, 9Unit Research, Spanish Society of Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain, 10ROB-FIN registry, Department of Medicine, Helsinki University and University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, 11UMC LJUBLJANA, DPT. OF RHEUMATOLOGY, LJUBLJANA, Slovenia, 12Centre for Rheumatology Research, Landspitali and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, 13Division of Rheumatology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey, Ankara, Turkey, 14Center of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania., Bucharest, Romania, 15Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 16Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 17University of Milan, Department of Rheumatology, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Lombardia, Italy, 18University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 19Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Dept. of Rheumatology, Oslo, Norway, 20Rheumatology and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Hospital de Santa Maria - Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, EPE | Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular - Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal,, Lisbon, Portugal, 21Research Unit, Spanish Society of Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain, 22Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, 23Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre, Ljubjana, Slovenia, 24Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, 25Division of Rheumatology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey, Kocaeli, Turkey, 26SPITALUL CLINIC SFANTA MARIA, Bucharest, 27University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 28Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, 29Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: psoriatic arthritis and patient-reported outcome measures

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster I: Patient Reported Outcomes

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) provide important information on  assessment of pain, disease activity, fatigue and physical function in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Knowledge of the evolution in PROs over time in patients, who initiate treatment with their 1st, 2nd or 3rd Tumour Necrosis Factor inhibitor (TNFi) in routine practice is limited. Hence, the aim of this was study was to investigate PROs at 6, 12 and 24 months after TNFi start and the changes from baseline to 6, 12 and 24 months in PsA patients, who initiated their 1st, 2nd or 3rd TNFi in clinical practice.

Methods: Pooled data on PsA patients from 13 European registries participating in the EuroSpA Research Collaboration were analysed (1). Patients were included in the study cohort if they had been followed in the registry from initiation of the 1st TNFi. PROs included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores on a 0-100 mm scale for pain, global disease activity and fatigue, while physical function was captured with Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). The distribution of PROs at 6, 12 and 24 months after TNFi start and the changes from baseline to 6, 12 and 24 months were investigated with descriptive statistics. PRO remission rates were defined as the proportion of patients achieving a state of pain score ≤20 mm, global score 20 mm, fatigue score ≤20 mm and HAQ score ≤0.5. Crude and LUNDEX-adjusted (2) PRO remission rates were assessed for the overall cohort and the individual registries.

Results: Of the 25,988 axSpA patients, who initiated 1st TNFi, 8,294 patients switched to a 2nd TNFi, while 2,842 patients subsequently switched to a 3rd TNFi. Baseline characteristics of the study cohort are shown in Table 1. The 6, 12 and 24 month PRO status and changes in PROs for 1st, 2nd and 3rd TNFi in the pooled cohort are summarized in Table 2. For the 1st, 2nd and 3rd TNFi, median PROs after 6 months ranged from 20mm to 30mm, 27mm to 40mm and 35mm to 50mm, respectively. Similarly, median decreases in PROs from baseline to 6 months ranged from 18 to 30mm, 8 to 18mm and 8 to 18mm for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd TNFi. In the overall cohort 6 month LUNDEX-adjusted PRO remission rates varied from 33% to 41%, 23% to 33% and 17% to 24% for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd TNFi, respectively (Table 2). In the individual registries, LUNDEX-adjusted 6 months PRO remission rates for the 1st TNFi ranged from 32% to 51%, 24% to 50%, 28% to 48%, 32% to 51% and 21% to 47% for pain, global, BASDAI, BASFI and fatigue scores, respectively.

Conclusion: In this large observational study cohort, one-third of patients achieved a state of PRO remission after 6 months of treatment with their first TNFi with significant variation between registries. As expected, improvements in PROs and PRO remission rates were lower in those who had switched to the 2nd or 3rd TNFi, reflecting selection of non-responders and more severe cases (confounding by indication).

References:

1  Brahe et al. Arthritis Rheum, 2018; 70 (suppl 10)

  1. Kristensen et al. Arthritis Rheum, 2006, 54(2), p:600-6

Acknowledgements: Novartis Pharma AG and IQVIA for supporting the EuroSpA


20190603_EuroSpA_study2.1_table1


20190603_EuroSpA_study2.1_table2


Disclosure: L. Ørnbjerg, Novartis, 2; L. Jacobsson, None; A. Loft, AbbVie, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; F. Iannone, AbbVie, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, lilly, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, MSD, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; M. Nissen, Abbvie, Celgene, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, 5, 8; E. Kristianslund, None; H. Mann, None; M. Santos, AbbVie, 8, Biogen, 8, Novartis, 8, Pfizer, 8, Roche, 8; M. Pombo-Suarez, None; K. Eklund, None; Z. Rotar, AbbVie, 9, Amgen, 5, 8, Eli-Lilly, 9, MSD, 5, Novartis, 9, Pfizer, 9, Sanofi, 5; B. Gudbjornsson, Actavis, 8, Amgen, 8, Novartis, 8, Pfizer, 8; M. Öztürk, None; C. Codreanu, AbbVie, 5, 8, Egis, 5, 8, Eli-Lilly, 5, 8, Ewopharma, 5, 8, Mylan, 5, 8, Novartis/Sandoz, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; M. van de Sande, Novartis, 2, 5, AbbVie, 5, Janssen, 2, Eli Lilly, 2; J. Wallman, AbbVie, 5, Celgene, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Novartis, 5, UCB Pharma, 5; E. Favalli, None; B. Moeller, AbbVie, 2, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 8, Janssen, 2, 8, Merck, 2, 8, Novartis, 2, 8, Pfizer, 2, 8, UCB, 2, 9; J. Sexton, None; K. Pavelka, AbbVie, 8, Abbvie, 5, 8, Amgen, 5, 8, BMS, 8, Egis, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, MSD, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, UCB, 8; E. Vieira-Sousa, None; C. Sánchez-Piedra, None; N. Trokovic, None; M. Tomsic, None; T. Love, None; A. Cefle, None; R. IONESCU, Abbvie, 5, 8, Amgen, 5, 8, Alpha Sigma, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Ewopharma, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, Mylan, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, 8; I. van der Horst-Bruinsma, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Bristol Myers-Squibb, 2, 5, 8, MSD, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 8; G. Jones, Celgene, 2; C. Heegaard Brahe, Novartis, 2; M. Lund Hetland, Abbvie, 2, AbbVie, 2, Biogen, 2, BMS, 2, CellTrion, 2, 9, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, Orion, 2, Pfizer, 2, Samsung, 2, UCB, 2; M. Østergaard, AbbVie, 2, 8, 9, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, UCB, 5, 8, Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, and UCB, 5, 8, Abbvie, Celgene, Centocor, Merck, and Novartis, 2, Abbvie, Celgene, Centocor, Merck, Novartis, 2, BMS, 2, 5, 8, 9, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, 8, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 8, Boehringer-ingelheim, 9, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Centocor, 2, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, 9, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, 8, Eli-Lilly, 2, 8, Hospira, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, 9, Merck, 2, 5, 8, 9, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Novo, 2, 5, 8, Novo Nordisk, 5, 8, Orion, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, 9, Regeneron, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, roche, 9, Sandoz, 2, 8, Sanofi, 2, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ørnbjerg L, Jacobsson L, Loft A, Iannone F, Nissen M, Kristianslund E, Mann H, Santos M, Pombo-Suarez M, Eklund K, Rotar Z, Gudbjornsson B, Öztürk M, Codreanu C, van de Sande M, Wallman J, Favalli E, Moeller B, Sexton J, Pavelka K, Vieira-Sousa E, Sánchez-Piedra C, Trokovic N, Tomsic M, Love T, Cefle A, IONESCU R, van der Horst-Bruinsma I, Jones G, Heegaard Brahe C, Lund Hetland M, Østergaard M. Patient Reported Outcomes over 2 Years in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Initiating Treatment with 1st, 2nd or 3rd TNF Inhibitor in Routine Care – Was PRO Remission Achieved? Results from the EuroSpA Collaboration [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-reported-outcomes-over-2-years-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-initiating-treatment-with-1st-2nd-or-3rd-tnf-inhibitor-in-routine-care-was-pro-remission-achieved-results-from-the-eu/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-reported-outcomes-over-2-years-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-initiating-treatment-with-1st-2nd-or-3rd-tnf-inhibitor-in-routine-care-was-pro-remission-achieved-results-from-the-eu/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology