ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 501

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Long-Term Upadacitinib Use in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Interim Analysis Results of a Phase 2, Open-Label Extension Study

Vibeke Strand1, Namita Tundia2 and Alan Friedman2, 1Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 2AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Janus kinase (JAK), patient-reported outcome measures and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster I: Comorbidities and Adverse Events; Efficacy and Safety of Small Molecules

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are being evaluated for treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The efficacy of upadacitinib (UPA), a selective JAK inhibitor, in improving patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been demonstrated.1 These analyses evaluated the long-term benefits of UPA on PROs in patients with active RA.

Methods: M13-538 (NCT02049138) is an ongoing, Phase 2 open-label extension study designed to assess long-term efficacy and safety of UPA in RA patients who completed BALANCE I and BALANCE II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where doses of 3, 6, 12 and 18 mg BID were evaluated. All eligible patients received UPA 6 mg bid within 30 days of completing either RCT. At weeks 6 and 12, patients with <20% improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC) received a dose increase to 12 mg bid UPA. After 6 weeks on 12 mg bid, patients failing to achieve ≥20% improvement in TJC and SJC discontinued treatment. After week 6, at the discretion of the investigator, the dose could be titrated to 12 mg bid for patients who did not meet low disease activity as defined by the Clinical Disease Activity Index. Continuing patients were divided into 3 cohorts: those who remained on 6 mg bid (never titrated); who increased to and remained on 12 mg bid (titrated up); and who increased to 12 mg bid and subsequently reduced to 6 mg bid only for a safety concern or intolerability (titrated up and down). PROs included: Patient’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA), Pain by Visual Analog Scale (Pain VAS), Health Assessment Questionnaire – Disability Index (HAQ-DI), FACIT – Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F), Work Instability Score for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA-WIS), and EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D). For this interim analysis, data collected on or before January 13, 2017 were analyzed. Mean changes from baseline and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each PRO at week 48.

Results: 493 patients received UPA. Across cohorts, mean age was 53–56 years, 78%–87% were female, and mean duration of RA 8.6–9.5 years. The total patient population exposure to UPA was 725.1 patient-years; with 78% of patients having exposure of ≥12 months and 72% having exposure of ≥18 months. At week 48, patients within all cohorts reported improvements across all PROs (Table). The majority of patients who never titrated dose reported the largest improvements from baseline across PROs at week 48, followed by those who titrated up or up and down.

Conclusion: Patients treated with UPA maintained clinically meaningful improvements in disease activity, pain, physical functioning, fatigue, work functioning, and overall health status till week 48.

Reference

1. Strand V et al. Poster SAT0217. EULAR, Madrid, Spain, 2017.

 

Table. Mean change in PRO scores from baseline to week 48.

 

Never Titrateda

N=328

Titrated Up and Not Downa

N=150

Titrated Up and Downa

N=15

PRO

n

Week 48

Change

n

Week 48

Change

n

Week 48

Change

PtGA

250

23.4

−39.6

114

36.6

−31.2

14

42.5

−22.4

Pain VAS

250

21.3

−42.7

114

35.5

−32.0

14

29.9

−35.6

HAQ-DI

249

0.7

−0.8

114

1.0

−0.6

14

0.7

−0.7

FACIT-F

249

40.6

10.8

114

36.3

10.5

14

40.5

11.1

RA-WISb

60

5.2

−7.3

41

9.3

−4.2

4

13.3

−2.8

EQ-5D

249

77.4

26.5

114

70.5

19.8

14

74.7

21.1

aTitration status was determined based on dosing information up to the cutoff date for the interim analysis.

bOnly included patients working at the time of questionnaire administration.

 



Disclosure: V. Strand, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Genentech, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, and UCB, 5,AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Genentech, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, and UCB, 9; N. Tundia, AbbVie, 3,AbbVie, 1; A. Friedman, AbbVie, 3,AbbVie, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Strand V, Tundia N, Friedman A. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Long-Term Upadacitinib Use in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Interim Analysis Results of a Phase 2, Open-Label Extension Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-reported-outcomes-of-long-term-upadacitinib-use-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-interim-analysis-results-of-a-phase-2-open-label-extension-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-reported-outcomes-of-long-term-upadacitinib-use-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-interim-analysis-results-of-a-phase-2-open-label-extension-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology