ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1928

Patient-Physician Communication about Medication Costs in Rheumatoid Arthritis

K. Julia Kaal1, Nick Bansback1,2,3, Aslam Anis4,5 and Mark Harrison5,6,7,8, 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2St Paul's Hospital, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada, 4University of British Columbia, School of Population and Public Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8Collaborations in Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Communication, patient preferences and treatment options

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: 4M104 ACR Abstract: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes I: Beliefs & Behaviors (1923–1928)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose:

Patients often have to pay for prescription medications out-of-pocket and cost-related nonadherence is a recognized problem. The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis is associated with high out-of-pocket cost. Research has shown that while patients may have a desire to discuss medication costs with health care professionals (HCPs) these discussions often do not take place. The objective of this study was to examine the frequency with which out-of-pocket medication costs are discussed and to examine predictors of these discussions between rheumatologists and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Canada.

Methods:

A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to patients with RA and rheumatologists in Canada. Participant characteristics and medication status were assessed and participants were asked to rate the importance of discussing out-of-pocket medication costs, as well as how often medication costs are discussed between physician and patients. Stepwise, multivariable logistic regression was used to explore the predictors of (1) patients discussing costs with their rheumatologist and, (2) perceived importance of discussing medication cost for patients. Potential predictors included age, sex, income, education, use of biologics, and attitude to shared decision making.

Results:

The sample contained 78 patients and 64 rheumatologists. There were no differences in the perceived importance of discussing medication costs between patients and physicians with over 65% of physicians and patients rating it as quite or very important. When asked whether they discuss medication cost during health care encounters, 22% of patients reported never talking about medication cost, whereas no physicians reported never discussing costs with their patients. Among patients who reported never talking about medication cost with their physician, 65% (n= 17) were currently taking and 6% (n=1) had taken a biologic agent in the past. There were no significant differences across responses to having talked about medication cost by income, education, age, or province. In multivariable logistic regression models, the odds of discussing cost among patients who perceived discussing cost with their HCP as ‘very important’ were 4.5 (p = 0.043) higher than patients who perceived discussing cost as ‘neither important nor unimportant’ or ‘not important’. No other characteristics were found to be significant predictors of discussing medication cost. No patient characteristics were statistically significant predictors of perceived importance of discussing cost.

Conclusion:

Out-of-pocket costs have been shown to affect medication adherence; consequently patients and HCPs should discuss costs in the treatment decision making process. Our findings suggest this does not always happen. Furthermore, medication cost was more likely to be discussed by patients who perceived it as ‘very important.’ This finding suggests that the onus to initiate discussions about cost is currently on patients, not HCPs). In the absence of any clear predictors of the perceived importance of discussing costs to patients, treatment costs and ability to pay should be discussed routinely, as an important component of shared decision making.


Disclosure: K. J. Kaal, None; N. Bansback, None; A. Anis, None; M. Harrison, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kaal KJ, Bansback N, Anis A, Harrison M. Patient-Physician Communication about Medication Costs in Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-physician-communication-about-medication-costs-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-physician-communication-about-medication-costs-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology