ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1913

Patient Perceptions of Telemedicine Use in Rheumatology Clinics During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance

Mithu Maheswaranathan1, Bruce Miller2, Carly Harrison3, Rashmi Sinha4, Bugra Egeli5, Berk Degirmenci6, Emily Sirotich7, Rebecca Grainger8, Jonathan Hausmann9, Jean Liew10 and Yu Pei Eugenia Chock11, 1Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 2University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 3LupusChat, Capitol Heights, MD, 4Systemic JIA Foundation, Cincinnati, OH, 5Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 6St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA, 7McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 8University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand, 9Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 10Boston University, Boston, MA, 11Yale School of Medicine, Greenwich, CT

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: COVID-19, health behaviors, telemedicine

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Abstracts: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes (1909–1914)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-3:15PM

Background/Purpose: During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare systems rapidly expanded telemedicine to ensure continued access to care. Few studies have explored patient perceptions of the telemedicine experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to better understand patient perspectives related to telemedicine use, including effectiveness and barriers of telemedicine use.

Methods: The COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance (C19-GRA) Patient Telemedicine Survey was an anonymous, cross-sectional online survey of participants with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) from December 2020 to May 2021. Information on diagnoses, demographics, socioeconomic status, and respondents’ perspectives on benefits and limitations of telemedicine use were collected. Data were summarized with descriptive statistics. Multivariable regression models adjusted for age, sex, country, disease type, and education level to perform relative risk estimates for dichotomous outcomes.

Results: The cohort included 596 respondents, of which 87% (514) were female, 47% (281) were 41-60 years of age. Race and ethnicity data were only collected for U.S respondents in which 81% (211) were white (Table 1). Common diagnoses were SLE (33%, 196) and RA (21%, 125). Most respondents were from the USA (44%, 262) or the United Kingdom (32%, 190). 79% (468) had completed a college or university degree or higher.

Of the 78% (467) respondents who used telemedicine during the pandemic, 65% (305) used audio (telephone) and 52% (242) used video (Table 2); about 70% (323) reported no problems when using video for telemedicine visits. 61% (283) found telemedicine effective compared to in-person visit and 40% (186) reported it would be important after the COVID-19 pandemic.

After adjusting for age, sex, country, disease type, and education level, UK respondents were more likely to report lower satisfaction with telemedicine care by their rheumatologists during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to US respondents. Those in high school were more likely to report lower satisfaction with telemedicine care compared to college graduates. Groups that rated telemedicine as less effective in their rheumatologic care included people over 60, respondents from the UK, Canada and Australia/New Zealand, as well as participants with graduate level education. Groups that reported post-pandemic telemedicine use as less important in their care included people over age 60 and respondents from the UK and Norway (Table 3).

Conclusion: The majority of patients with rheumatic disease found telemedicine as effective or more effective than in-person visits, with about half of the respondents reporting telemedicine as helpful when disease is stable or alternating with in-person visits. However, over a quarter of respondents said telemedicine would not play a role in their care after the pandemic and preferred only in-person visits post-pandemic. These patient preferences can help inform policy decisions related to ongoing telemedicine use and insurance coverage of telemedicine visits.


Disclosures: M. Maheswaranathan, None; B. Miller, None; C. Harrison, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc, 1, 11, Astra Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, 1, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 7; R. Sinha, None; B. Egeli, None; B. Degirmenci, None; E. Sirotich, None; R. Grainger, Pfizer New Zealand, 6, 12, support to travel to conference, Jansenn Autralia, 6, 12, travel to symposia, AbbVie New Zealand, 6, Cornerstones, 6, novartis, 1; J. Hausmann, Novartis, 2, Biogen, 2, Pfizer, 2; J. Liew, None; Y. Chock, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maheswaranathan M, Miller B, Harrison C, Sinha R, Egeli B, Degirmenci B, Sirotich E, Grainger R, Hausmann J, Liew J, Chock Y. Patient Perceptions of Telemedicine Use in Rheumatology Clinics During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-perceptions-of-telemedicine-use-in-rheumatology-clinics-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-an-analysis-from-the-covid-19-global-rheumatology-alliance/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-perceptions-of-telemedicine-use-in-rheumatology-clinics-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-an-analysis-from-the-covid-19-global-rheumatology-alliance/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology