ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2033

Patient Factors Associated with Oral Glucocorticoid Prescribing Patterns in UK Primary Care for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rachel J. Black1,2, Rebecca Joseph2,3, Benjamin Brown4, Mohammad Movahedi2, Mark Lunt5 and William G Dixon2, 1Department of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, 2Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 3Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Manchester, United Kingdom, 4Centre for Health Informatics, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 5Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: glucocorticoids and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health (ACR): Rheumatoid Arthritis Pathogenesis and Treatment

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Oral glucocorticoids (GCs) are commonly used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and GC prescriptions are often issued in the primary care setting. The objective of this study was to describe the patterns of GC prescribing for patients with RA in UK primary care and to identify patient characteristics that are associated with GC use.

Methods

16 536 patients with incident RA were identified from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a large UK general practice database. Descriptive statistics were used to identify patterns of GC prescribing for these patients. For patients who received more than one GC prescription over the observation period, the mean, minimum and maximum prednisolone equivalent doses were calculated. The median of these values across all treated patients was then calculated. Stepwise linear regression was used to identify baseline patient characteristics associated with GC prescriptions including: Demographics, Inflammatory comorbidities, GC-associated comorbidities and DMARDs. 

Results

7749 patients (47%) received at least one GC prescription during the follow up period. The median proportion of time spent on GCs was 24.3% (IQR 36.2%-64.2%). The median mean dose per treated patient was 7.5mg per day (IQR 5-15.7mg), the median minimum dose per treated patient was 5mg per day (IQR 2.5-7.5mg) and the median maximum dose per treated patient was 15mg per day (IQR 7.5-30mg).

Each 10-year increase in age was found to be associated with a 17% greater likelihood of being prescribed GCs (95%CI 1.14-1.20). There was no association with patient gender. Higher GC prescribing was seen in patients with inflammatory comorbidities of the lung: asthma (OR 1.59, 95%CI 1.43-1.76), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.65, 95%CI 1.35-2.01) and lower respiratory tract infections (OR 1.21, 95%CI 1.10-1.33). However, there was no association with inflammatory conditions of the skin or GI tract. The association with GC-associated comorbidities was less consistent. GC prescribing was higher in patients with cardiovascular disease (OR 1.27, 95%CI 1.05-1.53) and in current smokers (OR 1.22, 95%CI 1.13-1.32) but lower in patients with diabetes (OR 0.71, 95%CI 0.62-0.82) and high cholesterol (OR 0.86, 95%CI 0.76-0.97). There was no association with other GC-associated comorbidities including osteoporosis, avascular necrosis, myopathy, insomnia, depression, hypertension, peptic ulcer disease or pancreatitis.  A previous GC prescription prior to RA diagnosis was the strongest predictor of ever use post-diagnosis (OR 9.38, 95%CI 8.41- 10.46). GC prescribing was lower with methotrexate (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.66-0.98) and sulfasalazine use (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.58-0.83), but higher with leflunomide (OR 1.76, 95%CI 1.19-2.61) and other DMARD use (OR 1.73, 95%CI  1.33-2.26).

Conclusion

The presence of certain comorbidities at diagnosis, in particular inflammatory lung conditions, influenced GC prescribing. GC therapy was prescribed more commonly in higher risk patients, including older patients and those with CVD. Other GC-associated comorbidities, such as diabetes and hyperlipidaemia, were associated with less GC prescribing.


Disclosure:

R. J. Black,
None;

R. Joseph,
None;

B. Brown,
None;

M. Movahedi,
None;

M. Lunt,
None;

W. G. Dixon,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-factors-associated-with-oral-glucocorticoid-prescribing-patterns-in-uk-primary-care-for-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology