ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1556

Paradoxical Psoriasis: Experience Of a Biological Therapy Monographic Unit

Maria Luz Garcia Vivar1, Silvia Perez Barrio2, EVA Galindez Agirregoikoa3, Catalina Gomez Arango4, Jose Francisco Garcia Llorente5, Rosa Izu Belloso6, Esther Ruiz Lucea5, Ignacio Torre Salaberri7 and Jesus Maria Careaga Alzaga8, 1RHEUMATOLOGY, Rheumatology department, Basurto University Hospital., BILBAO, Spain, 2DERMATOLOGY, Dermatology Department.Basurto University Hospital., BILBAO, Spain, 3RHEUMATOLOGY, Rheumatology Department. Basurto University Hospital., BILBAO, Spain, 4Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Spain, 5RHEUMATOLOGY, Rheumatology department. Basurto University Hospital., BILBAO, Spain, 6DERMATOLOGY, Dermatology Department. Basurto University Hospital. Bilbao, BILBAO, Spain, 7Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Basurto. Bilbao. Spain, Bilbao, Spain, 8DERMATOLOGY, Dermatology department. Basurto University Hospital., BILBAO, Spain

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, cutaneous manifestations and security

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment: II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Anti TNF therapy’s efficacy in controlling cutaneous psoriasis has widely been proven, but development of paradoxical psoriasis (PPs) as a side effect can occur. We define psoriasis as a paradoxical effect when it appears as new onset or as a different type of psoriatic lesion; some authors also include worsening of previous psoriasis, when it is clearly related with the treatment.

Methods:

We reviewed the medical records from the 371 patients visited in the biological therapy monographic unit and from 150 pateients visited in the psoriatic arthropathy multidisciplinar clinic during 2011 and 2012. We selected 13 patients with suspected paradoxical psoriasis and we analyze clinical data, characteristics and severity of skin lesion, and the change in treatment required to control skin lesion

Results:

  From the 13 selected patients , two presented flares of their skin lesions related to the underlying diagnosis of PsA with severe cutaneous disease prior to biological treatment. Therefore, 11 patients fulfilled the previously exposed criteria for PPs; six female and 5 male, mean aged 47 years (from 34 to 78). 7 patients had had no previous psoriatic lesions: 5 were diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis (one negative HLA B27), one with rheumatoid arthritis and one with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (an adult patient). The remaining 4 patients were mixed forms of PsA, 3 of them had positive HLA B27.

The treatment involved was adalimumab in 7 patients, infliximab in two patients, and etanercept in the remaining two. PPs appeared between 2 and 38 months from the start of the biological therapy (mean 9 months), in 8 patients  during the first year of the treatment. 

PPs in two patients consisted of desquamative annular lesions that were confirmed by skin biopsy procedure. 7 patients had palmoplantar pustulosis, 4 presented skinfold psoriasis, 4 had scalp lesions, and 6 plaque psoriasis. 7 presented a mixture of different types of cutaneous psoriatic lesions. 

The injury was considered mild in 4 cases managed with topical corticosteroid treatment,  and moderate to severe in six patients that had to discontinue biologic therapy . Another one needed tapering of  the dose of etanercept from 50 to 25 mgs per week. After discontinuation, 4 patients needed a new biological drug (three antiTNF and one ustekinumab), with no cutaneous complication.  Skin evolution was satisfactory to improvement in all cases, with practical resolution in two.

Conclusion:

Paradoxical psoriasis is a rare complication appearing in less than 3% of our patients under biological therapy. Although it can occur in patients with any diagnosis and receiving any kind of antiTNF drug, we find it more frequently in those patients with spondyloarthropaties during the first year of treatment with monoclonal antibodies. It may be an important and disabling side effect, but withdrawal of the biological drug is not always needed. Switching to another antiTNF when needed seems also a safe therapeutic decision with satisfactory outcomes.


Disclosure:

M. L. Garcia Vivar,
None;

S. Perez Barrio,
None;

E. Galindez Agirregoikoa,
None;

C. Gomez Arango,
None;

J. F. Garcia Llorente,
None;

R. Izu Belloso,
None;

E. Ruiz Lucea,
None;

I. Torre Salaberri,
None;

J. M. Careaga Alzaga,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/paradoxical-psoriasis-experience-of-a-biological-therapy-monographic-unit/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology