ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 301

PANLAR Ultrasound Study Group Recommendations for the Use of Imaging in the Management of Patients with Gout

Marwin Gutierrez 1, Carlos Pineda 1, Janitzia Vazquez-Mellado 2, Mario Moreno Alvarez 3, Javier Rosa 4, Anthony Reginato5, Mario Chavez 6, Magaly Alva Linares 7, Marcelo Audisio 8, José Alexandre Mendonca 9, Tomas Cazenave 10, Oscar Sedano 11, Lucio Ventura Ríos 12, Eugenio de Miguel 13, Gurjit Kaeley 14, Eduardo Scheines 10, Fritz Hofmann 15, Gabriel Aguilar 16, Christian Waimann 17, Florencia Marengo 17 and Santiago Ruta 18, 1Division of Musculoskeletal and Rheumatic Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación “Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra”, Mexico, Mexico, Mexico, 2Rheumatology Department, Hospital General de Mexico, Mexico, Mexico, 3Rheumatology Department, Hospital General Luis Vernaza, Guayaquil, Ecuador., Guayaquil, Ecuador, 4Rheumatology Section, Internal Medicine Service, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 5Division of Rheumatology, Providence VAMC, Associate Professor in Medicine, The Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, 6Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes Aguascalientes, México., Aguascalientes, Mexico, 7Rheumatology Department, Hospital Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru., Lima, Peru, 8Rheumatology Department, Hospital Nacional de Clínicas, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina., Cordoba, Argentina, 9Rheumatology Department, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Brazil, Campinas, Brazil, 10Rheumatology Section, Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 11Reumatology Section, Hospital Marino Molina Scippa, Lima, Perú, Lima, Peru, 12Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación "Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra", México, Mexico, Mexico, 13Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain, 14Division of Rheumatology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL., Florida, 15Diagnostik Group, Puerto Vallarta, México., Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, 16Centro Diagnóstico Rossi, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 17Rheumatology Unit, Hospital Dr. Héctor Cura, Olavarría, Argentina., Olavarria, Argentina, 18Rheumatology Department, Hospital San Martín de La Plata and Rheumatology Unit, Hospital Italiano de La Plata, Argentina., La Plata, Argentina

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Computed tomography (CT), Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radiography and gout, Ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Imaging Of Rheumatic Diseases Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Gout is a metabolic disease caused by deposition of monosodium urate (MSU) monohydrate crystals in different tissues. Imaging may be useful to evaluate the extent of MSU deposition, the presence of acute and chronic inflammation, and tissue structural damage. The aim of the current study was to develop evidence-based and expert opinion recommendations for the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis, monitoring, prognosis and treatment of patients with gout.

Methods: A selected group of experts (rheumatologists, radiologists, rheumatologist sonographers, methodologists and statisticians) from different PANLAR countries were included in the gout imaging task force. Imaging modalities evaluated were: conventional radiography (CR), ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). Seven clinical questions were selected using the Delphi technique with RAND/UCLA modified methodology. Each question was scored in a visual analogue scale from 1 to 9 (1: complete disagreement; 9: complete agreement). With the information obtained, questions were reformulated and re-evaluated using the same scoring system. One question did not reach agreement. Finally, six questions were selected. A systematic literature review was performed using Medline, LILACs, Embase and Cochrane databases from January 1966 to February 2018. The search resulted in a total of 8657 articles, of which 1957 were duplicated. Of the 6700 remaining, 6020 were excluded based on the title and/or summary, leaving 680 for full text review. After that, 639 were excluded, leaving a total of 41 articles as supporting evidence, by two independent reviewers (agreement 97%, kappa 0.91). Recommendations were developed by consensus following similar methodology utilized for clinical question selection. Such recommendations were graded according to levels of evidence from the Oxford Center of Medicine in 2011. Final recommendations were eventually presented to an independent committee including representatives from several PANLAR rheumatologist societies.

Results: Eight recommendations were developed for the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis, monitoring, prognosis and treatment of patients with gout. The strength of each recommendation was established based on the evidence level as well as rate of agreement. Both gout imaging task force and independent committee agreed with the final recommendations (Table 1).

Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, these are the first evidence-based and expert opinion recommendations for the use of imaging in patients with gout, providing some guidelines for their use in daily clinical practice.


Table


Disclosure: M. Gutierrez, None; C. Pineda, None; J. Vazquez-Mellado, None; M. Moreno Alvarez, None; J. Rosa, ABBVIE, 8, BRISTOL, 8, JANSSEN, 8, LILLY, 8, NOVARTIS, 8, PFIZER, 8; A. Reginato, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, Novartis, 5, Horizon, 5; M. Chavez, None; M. Alva Linares, None; M. Audisio, None; J. Mendonca, None; T. Cazenave, None; O. Sedano, None; L. Ventura Ríos, None; E. de Miguel, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, BMS, 8, BMS, MSD, UCB, Roche, 8, MSD, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 8, UCB, 8; G. Kaeley, None; E. Scheines, None; F. Hofmann, None; G. Aguilar, None; C. Waimann, None; F. Marengo, None; S. Ruta, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gutierrez M, Pineda C, Vazquez-Mellado J, Moreno Alvarez M, Rosa J, Reginato A, Chavez M, Alva Linares M, Audisio M, Mendonca J, Cazenave T, Sedano O, Ventura Ríos L, de Miguel E, Kaeley G, Scheines E, Hofmann F, Aguilar G, Waimann C, Marengo F, Ruta S. PANLAR Ultrasound Study Group Recommendations for the Use of Imaging in the Management of Patients with Gout [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/panlar-ultrasound-study-group-recommendations-for-the-use-of-imaging-in-the-management-of-patients-with-gout/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/panlar-ultrasound-study-group-recommendations-for-the-use-of-imaging-in-the-management-of-patients-with-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology