ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2313

Pain-Related Anxiety As a Barrier To Use Of Methotrexate In Rheumatoid Arthritis: Comparing Conventional Vial, Needles, and Syringe With An Investigational Auto-Injector In Healthy Volunteers

Victoria L. Ruffing1 and Kaushik J. Dave2, 1Medicine JHAAC, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 2Product Development, Antares Pharma Inc, Ewing, NJ

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: methotrexate (MTX) and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: ARHP Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects: Clinical Practice/Patient Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose:

 

Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. Limitations of systemic exposure of oral MTX can affect its efficacy. Subcutaneous (SC) MTX improves bioavailability, which may result in better efficacy, and tolerability.  Self-administration of SC MTX via conventional vial, needle, syringe (VNS) is challenging for some patients due to functional limitations, injection-site adverse events (AEs), and especially anxiety associated with pain. Use of SC MTX is limited to <5% of patients in the U.S. An analysis of literature from 1982-2012 on patient perception and experiences with self-administered medication for multiple diseases (RA, diabetes, hepatitis, multiple sclerosis) also suggests that anxiety associated with pain when using conventional VNS is often a barrier to use. Improvements in the delivery of SC MTX may alleviate anxiety associated with pain. In this study, the prototype of an investigational, first-in-class auto-injector (AI) for MTX is evaluated. 

Methods:

This study compares administration-related pain and bleeding in healthy volunteers using conventional VNS and AI. 21 volunteers received 12 injections (6 with AI; 6 with VNS) of 1.0 mL saline administered by study personnel according to a randomized schedule. Pain was measured on a 20-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 19 (extremely intense pain).  Injection site bleeding was also assessed.

Results:

Pain was rated as none or faint for 78.4% of 125 AI administrations and 59.7% for 129 injections with VNS (Fishers Exact Text, P=0.0017). In addition, no pain was reported for 56.0% of AI administrations vs. 34.9% with VNS (P=0.0010) (Table). No pain scores >10 were reported for either treatment. No bleeding was observed in 89.7% of AI administrations vs. 79.2% of those with VNS (P=0.0069). 

Table. Pain scores

Pain Score

Auto-injector
(n=125) %

VNS
(n=129) %

0

56.0

34.9

1

22.4

24.8

2

6.4

6.2

3

5.6

17.0

4

3.2

6.2

5

2.4

3.9

6

0.8

1.5

7

2.4

2.3

8

0

2.3

9

0

0.8

10

0.8

0

>10

0

0

Conclusion:

 

Pain-related patient anxiety often associated with SC administration of medications is a potential cause for underutilization of SC MTX in the treatment of RA. By decreasing pain associated with self-injection, an AI may address issues of needle phobia and improve rates of utilization of SC MTX in patients who may benefit from this method of delivery.


Disclosure:

V. L. Ruffing,
None;

K. J. Dave,

Antares Pharma,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pain-related-anxiety-as-a-barrier-to-use-of-methotrexate-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-comparing-conventional-vial-needles-and-syringe-with-an-investigational-auto-injector-in-healthy-volunteers/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology