ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings
  • Abstract Number: 1228 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Predicting RA Remission with Subcutaneous Abatacept Treatment in the Real-world Setting

    Rieke Alten1, Christiane Rauch2, Bettina Bannert3, Sara Marsal4, Maya Buch5, Roberto Caporali6, Melanie Chartier7, Sean Connolly8, Hedley Griffiths9, Xavier Mariette10, Michael Nurmohamed11, Yusuf Patel12, Peter Peichl13, Raimon Sanmarti14, Yedid Elbez15 and Karissa Lozenski8, 1Schlosspark-Klinik University, Berlin, Germany, 2Bristol Myers Squibb, Munich, Germany, 3Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 4Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, 5University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 6Policlinico S. Matteo University, Pavia, Italy, 7Bristol Myers Squibb, Rueil-Malmaison, France, 8Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 9Barwon Rheumatology Service, Geelong, Australia, 10Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Hospital Bicêtre, Paris, France, 11ARC Amsterdam University Hospitals – VU University Medical & Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 12Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, United Kingdom, 13Evangelical Hospital, Vienna, Austria, 14Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 15Deepscover, Puteaux, France

    Background/Purpose: A treat-to-target approach for RA management is recommended, with the aim of achieving remission.1,2 The Abatacept SubCutaneOus in Routine clinical practicE (ASCORE; NCT02090556) study…
  • Abstract Number: 1229 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Does BMI Influence the Efficacy of Subcutaneous or Intravenous Abatacept in Patients with RA in Routine Clinical Practice? A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Real-world Observational Studies

    Rieke Alten1, Xavier Mariette2, Melanie Chartier3, Christiane Rauch4, Yedid Elbez5, Karissa Lozenski6 and Vadim Khaychuk6, 1Schlosspark-Klinik University, Berlin, Germany, 2Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Hospital Bicêtre, Paris, France, 3Bristol Myers Squibb, Rueil-Malmaison, France, 4Bristol Myers Squibb, Munich, Germany, 5Deepscover, Puteaux, France, 6Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

    Background/Purpose: BMI has been shown to affect treatment response and may influence the development of optimal individualized treatment plans in patients with RA.1 The extent…
  • Abstract Number: 1230 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Impact of Serologic Status on Clinical Responses to Upadacitinib or Abatacept in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Prior Inadequate Response to Biologic DMARDs: Sub-Group Analysis from the Phase 3 SELECT-CHOICE Study

    Andrea Rubbert-Roth1, Jeffrey Sparks2, Arnaud Constantin3, Ricardo Xavier4, Yanna Song5, Jessica Suboticki5 and Roy Fleischmann6, 1Kantonspital St Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland, 2Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse Cedex 9, France, 4Departamento de Reumatologia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 5AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 6University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX

    Background/Purpose: In patients with RA who had a prior inadequate response or intolerance to biologic DMARDs, the oral Janus kinase inhibitor, upadacitinib (UPA), demonstrated superiority…
  • Abstract Number: 1231 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Consistent Impact of Autoantibody Enrichment Across All ACR Core Measures in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Abatacept: Data from a Large Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Controlled Trials

    Philip Conaghan1, Sang Hee Park2, Mirko Fillbrunn3, Karissa Lozenski2, Vadim Khaychuk2, Kaleb Michaud4, Elyse Swallow3, Henry Lane3, Ha Nguyen3 and Janet Pope5, 1Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 3Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, 4University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 5University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada

    Background/Purpose: Biomarkers play an important role in RA and can help guide treatment decisions. Previous studies have suggested differential treatment efficacy of abatacept (ABA) in…
  • Abstract Number: 1232 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Synovial Tissue Lymphoid Aggregates Are Associated with Response to Rituximab Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

    Matthew Turk1, Candice Low2, Carl Orr3, Richard Conway4, Kieran Murray5, Ursula Fearon6 and Douglas Veale7, 1St. Vincents University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 2St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 3St Vincent's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 4St. James's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 5Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 6Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, 7University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Background/Purpose: Activated B lymphocytes and plasma cells are implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy (Rituximab) is an effective…
  • Abstract Number: 1233 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Physician and Patient Reported Effectiveness Outcomes Are Similar in Tofacitinib and TNF Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Data from a Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry in Canada

    Mohammad Movahedi1, Angela Cesta2, Xiuying Li2, Edward Keystone3 and Claire Bombardier4, 1Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, UHN, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Keystone Consulting Enterprises Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada, 4University of Toronto - Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib (TOFA) is an oral, small molecule drug used for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment as an alternative option to biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs…
  • Abstract Number: 1234 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Long-Term Upadacitinib Therapy

    Martin Bergman1, Maya Buch2, Yoshiya Tanaka3, Gustavo Citera4, Sami Bahlas5, Ernest Wong6, Yanna Song7, Namita Tundia7, Jessica Suboticki7 and Vibeke Strand8, 1Martin Jan Bergman, MD, Ridley Park, PA, 2University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 3University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan, 4Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 5Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 6Rheumatology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom, 7AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 8Stanford University School of Medicine, Portola Valley, CA

    Background/Purpose: Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) is a pooled index of 3 patient-reported measures: patient global assessment, pain, and physical function. RAPID3…
  • Abstract Number: 1235 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Treatment Effect of Baricitinib on Fatigue: Mediation Analysis Results from Two Phase 3 Trials

    Bruno Fautrel1, Bochao Jia2, Jianmin Wu3, Ju Ji2, Julie Birt2, Ewa Haladyj2 and Tsutomu Takeuchi4, 1Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 3Eli Lilly and Company, Indianaplolis, IN, 4Div. Rheumatology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

    Background/Purpose: Fatigue is very common in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and impairs patient quality of life. Baricitinib (BARI) improved fatigue, pain and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs)…
  • Abstract Number: 1236 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Pain in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Did or Did Not Achieve Treatment Response Based on Improvement in Swollen Joints with Baricitinib Clinical Trials

    Anthony Sebba1, Duzhe Wang2, Bochao Jia2, Jason Troutt2, Julie Birt2, Amanda Quebe3 and Peter C Taylor4, 1Division of Rheumatology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 3Eli Lilly and Company, Indanapolis, IN, 4University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

    Background/Purpose: Baricitinib (BARI) is a Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor which provides improvements to clinical signs, symptoms, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis…
  • Abstract Number: 1237 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Predictors of Response: Baseline Characteristics and Early Treatment Responses Associated with Achievement of Remission and Low Disease Activity Among Upadacitinib-Treated Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Arthur Kavanaugh1, Zoltan Szekanecz2, Edward Keystone3, Andrea Rubbert-Roth4, Stephen Hall5, Ricardo Xavier6, Joaquim Pereira7, In-Ho Song8, Naomi Martin9, Yanna Song8, Samuel Anyanwu8 and Peter Nash10, 1Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 2Division of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary, 3Keystone Consulting Enterprises Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Kantonspital St Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland, 5Emeritus Research and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, Melbourne, Australia, 6Departamento de Reumatologia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 7Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal, 8AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 9AbbVie Inc., Saint-Laurent, QC, Canada, 10Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia

    Background/Purpose: Early prediction of response to treatment with upadacitinib (UPA) 15 mg once daily (QD) could help optimize therapy in patients (pts) with RA.1-4 The…
  • Abstract Number: 1238 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Low Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Negative Rheumatoid Factor Are Strongly Associated with Likelihood of Maintaining Remission Following Tapering of Therapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Jeffrey Curtis1, Paul Emery2, Boulos Haraoui3, Greg Kricorian4, Priscilla Yen4, David Collier5 and Vivian Bykerk6, 1Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds and Leeds NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom, 3Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada, 4Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 5Amgen Inc., Simi Valley, CA, 6Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

    Background/Purpose: According to ACR and EULAR recommendations, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who persist in remission (REM) should consider tapering RA therapy. Identification of clinical…
  • Abstract Number: 1239 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Those Who Stay in Remission and Those Who Have Disease-Worsening Following Therapy Withdrawal in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Vivian Bykerk1, Jeffrey Curtis2, Paul Emery3, Boulos Haraoui4, Elaine Karis5, Greg Kricorian5, David Collier6, Priscilla Yen5 and Bradley Stolshek5, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds and Leeds NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom, 4Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada, 5Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 6Amgen Inc., Simi Valley, CA

    Background/Purpose: Patients with RA in remission (REM) may experience disease-worsening (DW) following therapy change or withdrawal. The change in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after therapy withdrawal…
  • Abstract Number: 1240 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Biomarker Driven Dissection of Inflammation Modulatory Effects of Upadacitinib versus Abatacept in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory to Biologic DMARDs

    Fang Cai1, Thierry Sornasse2, Feng Hong3, Heidi Camp4, Koji Kato5 and Iain McInnes6, 1AbbVie, Redwood City, CA, 2AbbVie Inc, Redwood City, CA, 3AbbVie, Worcester, MA, 4AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 5AbbVie Inc, Shinagawa- Ku, Japan, 6University of Glasgow, School of Medicine, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

    Background/Purpose: In patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to biologic DMARDs (bDMARD-IR), a phase 3, double-blind and active-controlled study (SELECT-CHOICE) demonstrated that upadacitinib (UPA)…
  • Abstract Number: 1241 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Comparison of the Effects of Upadacitinib Monotherapy with MTX on Protein Biomarkers in MTX-Naïve and MTX-Inadequate Responders in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from the SELECT-EARLY and SELECT‑MONOTHERAPY Phase 3 Studies

    Thierry Sornasse1, Heidi Camp2, Fang Cai3, Justin Klaff2 and Iain McInnes4, 1AbbVie Inc, Redwood City, CA, 2AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 3AbbVie, Redwood City, CA, 4University of Glasgow, School of Medicine, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

    Background/Purpose: In MTX-naïve patients (SELECT-EARLY/M13-545 Phase 3 study) UPA 15 mg QD monotherapy (UPA Mono) demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful improvements in RA signs and…
  • Abstract Number: 1242 • ACR Convergence 2021

    Sex Differences in Treatment Response to Three Different Biological Treatments and Corticosteroids in Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Kristina Lend1, Ronald F van Vollenhoven2, Jon Lampa3, Merete Hetland4, Espen Haavardsholm5, Dan Nordström6, Michael Nurmohamed7, Bjorn Gudbjornsson8, Anna Rudin9, Mikkel Ostergaard10, Till Uhlig11, Gerdur Grondal8, Kim Hørslev-Petersen12, Marte S Heiberg5, Tuulikki Sokka-Isler13, Jos Twisk14 and Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma15, 1Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, The Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 2Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Rheumatology and Immunology Center ARC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, The Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden, 4DANBIO and COPECARE, Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark, 5Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 6Division of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, 7Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 8Landspitali University Hospital, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, 9Rheumatology Clinic, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy of University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 10Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark, 11Diakonhjemmet Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 12Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University of Southern Denmark, Reykjavik, Iceland, Haderslev, Denmark, 13University of Eastern Finland, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland, 14Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 15Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Background/Purpose: To investigate sex differences in clinical response to three different biological treatments in combination with methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX plus corticosteroids (active conventional treatment;…
  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 785
  • 786
  • 787
  • 788
  • 789
  • …
  • 2607
  • Next Page »
Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology