ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2846

Outcomes over the First 5 Years of Follow up in a Very Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Cohort Recruited over 20 Years: Most of the Improvement Occurred Before the 2011 Implementation of Treat-to-Target (T2T)

Nathalie Carrier 1, Sophie Roux 2, Ariel Masetto 2, Artur deBrum Fernandes 2, Patrick Liang 2, Meryem Maoui 3 and Gilles Boire2, 1CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 2Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 3Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, St-Laurent, QC, Canada

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: DMARDs, Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, joint damage and Disease Activity, patient outcomes

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: 5T114: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes IV: Outcomes (2846–2851)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: To analyze the evolution over 20 years of disease activity, treatments and radiographic progression over the first 5 years of follow up of patients with incident RA.

Methods: Since July 1998, the Early Undifferentiated PolyArthritis (EUPA) cohort recruited consecutive adults with recent-onset immune-mediated synovitis affecting at least 3 joints. From the start, patients were treated aiming at 0 swollen joint. Outcomes over 5 years were compared in patients fulfilling RA criteria according to date of inclusion (Period 1: 1998-2004; Period 2: 2005-2010; Period 3: 2011-2018). Disease activity was measured according to DAS28-CRP and SDAI; remission was also studied according to ACR/EULAR criteria. Use of conventional DMARD treatments was defined as none, simple, double and triple; mean MTX dose and biologic DMARD use were also compared across periods. Erosive damage was scored according to Sharp/van der Heijde; erosive status was defined as ≥5 Erosion units. False discovery rate correction was used to adjust p-values for multiple comparisons.

Results: 753 patients were included: 247, 263 and 243 in Periods 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Over the 5 years of follow up, DAS-28 scores significantly decreased and the number of patients reaching DAS-28 remission increased between Periods 1 and 2 (RR(95%CI)= 1.14 (1.03-1.26), p=0.04) and Periods 1 and 3 (RR=1.13 (1.01-1.27), p=0.055), but not between Periods 2 and 3. SDAI remission was not significantly different between Periods; however, SDAI remission was reached earlier during Period 3. Nonetheless, ACR/EULAR remission was reached earlier and was significantly more frequent in Period 3 than in Periods 1 and 2 (RR=1.43 (1.14-1.79), p=0.005; RR=1.36 (1.10-1.68), p=0.006 respectively), but not between Periods 2 and 1. There were no significant differences in mean HAQ scores nor Patient Evaluation of disease activity between Periods. The use of combination DMARDs increased between Periods at each follow up visit, reaching a peak of 25.7% receiving triple therapy at 18 months during Period 3 (versus 5.6% and 12.4% during Periods 1 and 2). Mean MTX dosage increased significantly from Period 1 to Period 2 to Period 3. The use of biologic DMARDs markedly increased between Periods 1 and 2 (RR=3.27 (1.92-5.57), p< 0.001), but significantly decreased from Period 2 to 3 (RR=0.62 (0.41-0.93), p=0.02). The use of corticosteroids did not differ significantly between Periods. Erosive damage decreased significantly over each Period (Periods 2 versus 1: RR= 0.65 (0.53-0.81), p=0.002; Periods 3 versus 1: RR=0.42 (0.31-0.56), p=0.002; Periods 3 versus 2: RR=0.64 (0.46-0.88), p=0.007).

Conclusion: In this cohort of recent onset (mean 3.8 months) RA recruited over 20 years, we observed during the 2005-2011 Period, relative to 1998-2004, a marked improvement in control of disease activity and in erosive damage concomitant with use of higher doses of MTX, more combination DMARDs and more biologic DMARDs. The major changes observed after the 2011 launch of Treat-to-Target initiative, were faster control of disease activity and faster attainment of deep levels of remission, resulting in improved radiographic outcomes despite less frequent use of biologic DMARDs.


Table

Outcome comparisons during 5 years of follow up in 753 RA patients recruited over 3 successive Periods: 1998-2004; 2005-2010; 2011-2018


Disclosure: N. Carrier, None; S. Roux, None; A. Masetto, None; A. deBrum Fernandes, None; P. Liang, None; M. Maoui, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, 3; G. Boire, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Carrier N, Roux S, Masetto A, deBrum Fernandes A, Liang P, Maoui M, Boire G. Outcomes over the First 5 Years of Follow up in a Very Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Cohort Recruited over 20 Years: Most of the Improvement Occurred Before the 2011 Implementation of Treat-to-Target (T2T) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/outcomes-over-the-first-5-years-of-follow-up-in-a-very-early-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-cohort-recruited-over-20-years-most-of-the-improvement-occurred-before-the-2011-implementation-of-treat-to-targe/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/outcomes-over-the-first-5-years-of-follow-up-in-a-very-early-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-cohort-recruited-over-20-years-most-of-the-improvement-occurred-before-the-2011-implementation-of-treat-to-targe/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology