ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 975

Outcomes-Based Program Evaluation Of a Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Curriculum

Hitasha Singh1 and Karina D. Torralba2, 1Rheumatology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2Rheumatology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Education and ultrasonography

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Medical Education

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Rheumatology fellowship program has incorporated musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) in its curriculum since 2009.  The following teaching approaches have been used: 1) 8-hour correlative history-physical exam-MSUS didactic and hands-on scanning workshop, 2) twice monthly cadaver-based procedural simulation, and 3) weekly MSUS clinic. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this curriculum in the acquisition and utilization of MSUS-knowledge and skills (MSUS-KS).

Methods: Program evaluation was done through: 1) Likert-scale based survey of current and past fellows (2010-2013, (N=15)), noting satisfaction with organization and content, confidence, and MSUS-KS utilization, 2) written feedback from 3 faculty members regarding challenges faced, 3) MSUS-clinic utilization review via sampling of 50 cases referred and seen by fellows since 2010 (reasons for referral, interventions, patient outcomes); and 4) review of competency-based electronic portfolios (ePFs) for learning evidences. Ultrasound School of North American Rheumatologists (USSONAR) fellow program participation was also considered. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze data. 

Results: 11/15 fellows responded to the survey (6 current, 5 graduates; 4 were USSONAR participants). There was a favorable response towards organization and content of the workshop-didactic sessions, and clinic. Suggested improvements included: limiting simulations to once monthly, correlative dissection; and disease-specific (i.e. synovitis) didactics. Immediate feedback from faculty was useful. 10/11 agreed with understanding MSUS indications and limitations, and had an improved understanding of clinical anatomy. There was at least 50% neutral-disagree responses regarding confidence in using MSUS, ability to identify pathology; and amongst graduates, regarding application of MSUS-KS in practice.   Faculty cited a learning curve, striking a balance between developing their own MSUS-KS while also achieving confidence and competency in teaching this field. ePFs showed documentation through procedure logs and journal article reviews; USSONAR fellows had more number of evidences. Referrals to MSUS clinic were mainly by fellows sending patients from continuity clinics, and majority were for rheumatoid arthritis disease activity evaluation. 38% of patients had management changes as a result of MSUS findings. 20 patients underwent MSUS-guided injection; 80% had symptom relief at follow-up.

Conclusion: This program evaluation indicates feasibility in the usage of these various teaching approaches as part of a MSUS curriculum. Faculty development and learner participation are vital towards successful implementation; USSONAR participation can complement learning. Feedback can be used to improve curricular content and organization, and assessment.  Measures are needed ensure lifelong learning. Although this study involved a limited number of fellows in one program, it provides a realistic view of how to incorporate MSUS into a fellowship curriculum.


Disclosure:

H. Singh,
None;

K. D. Torralba,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/outcomes-based-program-evaluation-of-a-musculoskeletal-ultrasound-curriculum/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology