ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2899

Outcome Of Incidental Silent Strokes In Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Jamal Mikdashi, Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects: Cardiovascular and Other Complications of Lupus

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Silent strokes are brain infarcts that lack clinically overt stroke-like symptoms and fail to come to clinical attention. The prevalence of incidentally detected acute/subacute silent brain infarcts (SBIs) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is not known. Our aim is to determine the prevalence of SBIs in SLE and examine their outcome.

Methods: Consecutive subjects drawn from the Maryland Lupus Cohort, aged 18–50 years who underwent a cranial MRI between 2000 and 2010 were included. A total of 376 eligible patients were identified: 30 did not undergo diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 32 patients had inadequate follow-up, leaving a study population of 314 patients. Incidental silent stroke was ascertained when focal T2 hyperintense lesions ≥3 mm on diffusion-weighted imaging with corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient defects were identified. Demographic and clinical data for SLE patients with SBIs (n=86) were compared to SLE patients with no SBIs (n=228). The primary outcome was recurrent stroke and cognitive dysfuction determined at mean follow up of 24 months. A forward stepwise Cox regression model was used to determine factors associated with recurrent stroke or cognitive dysfunction in SBIs patients. Significant variables; age, ethnicity, smoking, alcohol intake, and cardiovascular risk factors were included in the model. SLE disease activity (SLEDAI), damage (SDI) and duration of SLE were adjusted for during analyses.

Results:

86 of 314 (27.4 %) subjects had SBIs with a mean age (SBIs=37.3 +/- 12.1 years, No SBIs=34.7 +/- 14.7 years), women (SBIs=80 %, No SBIs=80 %), African American (SBIs=70 %, No SBIs= 65 %), and mean duration of SLE (SBIs= 9.0 + 3.6, No SBIs= 6.9 + 2.8 years). Hypertension (SBIs= 80 %, No SBI= 65 %), migraine with aura (SBIs 10.4 %, No SBIs= 2.6 %), and cardiovascular disease (SBIs= 11.6 %, No SBIs =1.7 %) were more frequent among patients with SBIs. There were no significant statistical differences among both groups with respect to baseline SLEDAI or SDI. SBIs were small and subcortical (basal ganglia 46.5 %, cerebellum 23.4 %, globus pallidus 7.0 %, corpus callosum 4.7 %).

Recurrent stroke occurred among SBIs patients (29%) and among those with no SBIs (6.5%), (p= 0.004). Independent predictors of recurrent stroke in SBIs patients included, anti-phospholipid syndrome [OR 12.0; 95% CI: 1.2-203.1].

A majority of the subjects with SBIs had significant cognitive impairment compared to no SBIs patients (60 % v 22%). SBIs patients had poorer memory and cognitive performance in all domains as compared to no SBI patients, including executive function, working memory, language, attention, and visuospatial abilities, but significantly in global cognition (48 % v 20 %) and information processing speed (42 % v 15 %). Independent predictors of cognitive dysfunction in SBIs patients included baseline presence of extensive white matter hyperintensity lesions in the periventricular and subcortical regions [OR: 10.1; 95 % CI: 1.1-98.4].

Conclusion: Silent strokes are prevalent in SLE, and are associated with recurrent strokes and cognitive dysfunction. Identifying novel risk factors that shed light on SBIs pathogenesis in SLE may offer potential therapeutic targets.


Disclosure:

J. Mikdashi,
None;

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/outcome-of-incidental-silent-strokes-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology