ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2003

Outcome Of Gout Patients Placed On Febuxostat After Failing To Reach Serum Urate Target With Allopurinol

Hind Hatoum1,2, Dinesh Khanna3, Aki Shiozawa4, Swu-Jane Lin1,5, Kasem Akhras6 and Puja Khanna7, 1Hind T. Hatoum and Company, Chicago, IL, 2University of Illinois at Chicago, chicago, IL, 3Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 4Global Outcomes and Epidemiology Research, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc, Deerfield, IL, 5University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 6Global Outcomes Research, Formerly of Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc, Deerfield, IL, 7Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Febuxostat, Gout and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The 2012 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) gout guidelines recommends allopurinol or febuxostat as first-line urate-lowering therapy (ULT). Purpose of this study was to compare outcomes in ULT-treated patients who were initiated and maintained on either allopurinol or febuxostat. In addition to outcomes of those switched to febuxostat after failing to reach target serum urate (sUA) ≤ 6mg/dL on allopurinol.

Methods: Centricity Electronic Medical Record database of ambulatory care by GE was used. Patients ≥18 years of age, with newly diagnosed with gout (ICD-9, 274.xx) on or after 2005, and initiated on allopurinol or febuxostat were included. Study index date was defined as date of first initiated ULT in patients with at least 6 months of data pre- and post study index. Patients were followed to date of last record. Primary study endpoint was reaching target sUA <6mg/dL within 6 months from index date. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were performed on proportions of patients who reached target sUA among groups of allopurinol-throughout, febuxostat-throughout, or allopurinol-switched-to-febuxostat.

Results: Study cohort consisted of 16,366 patients who used allopurinol throughout, 884 patients used febuxostat throughout, 505 patients switched to febuxostat after failing targeted sUA with allopurinol. Within 6 months after switching to febuxostat, 36.8% of 505 patients who failed to reach target sUA on allopurinol achieved the goal sUA <6mg/dL. The proportion of allopurinol-switched-to-febuxostat who reached target sUA level was significantly higher than that among the allopurinol-throughout patients (36.8 vs. 28.9%, p=0.001), however, significantly lower than that among the febuxostat-throughout patients (36.8% vs. 46.0%, p=0.003, Figure). The 6-month average sUA after switching was 5.4 mg/dL, representing 39% reduction from the mean value of 8.6 mg/dL at time of switch. At the end of available records, 244/505 (48.3%) reached target. For these patients who reached target sUA, the mean (SD) days to switch from allopurinol was 197 (165 days), and the mean days of febuxostat treatment after the switch was 111 (137 days). The only significant difference between those who reached or did not reach sUA target was that the former group was significantly older (Table).  

Conclusion: Proportion of patients reaching target sUA levels varied significantly in patients utilizing ULT. Those who switched from allopurinol to febuxostat did significantly better than those who stayed on allopurinol in reaching target sUA but worse than those who started on febuxostat from the beginning.


 


Disclosure:

H. Hatoum,

Hind Hatoum,

5;

D. Khanna,

Dinesh Khanna,

5,

Dinesh Khanna,

2;

A. Shiozawa,

Takeda Pharmaceuticals International,

3;

S. J. Lin,

Swu-Jane Lin,

5;

K. Akhras,

Kasem Akhras,

3;

P. Khanna,

Puja Khanna,

5,

Puja Khanna,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/outcome-of-gout-patients-placed-on-febuxostat-after-failing-to-reach-serum-urate-target-with-allopurinol/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology