ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1243

Osteoporosis Medication Adherence: Reasons For Stopping and Not Starting

Amy H. Warriner1, Ryan C. Outman2, Allison Wyman3, Fred H. Hooven4, Jonathan D. Adachi5, Roland Chapurlat6, Juliet E. Compston7, Cyrus Cooper8, Jeffrey R. Curtis9, Adolfo Díez-Pérez10, Robert Lindsay11, Lyn March12, Jeri W. Nieves11 and Kenneth G. Saag13, 1Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Center for Outcomes Research, Center for Outcomes Research, UMass Medical School, Worcester, MA, 4University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, 5McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 6Service de Rhumatologie et Pathologie Osseuse, INSERM UMR 1033 and Université de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France, 7University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 8MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton, United Kingdom, 9Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 10Internal Medicine, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona; and RETICEF, ISCIII Madrid; Spain, Barcelona, Spain, 11Helen Hayes, West Haverstraw, NY, 12Rheumatology, Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 13Immunology & Rheumatology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Compliance, medication, osteoporosis, patient and prescribing trends

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease: Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Medication adherence with prescription osteoporosis medications is poor, with approximately half remaining adherent in the first year of treatment. Moreover, approximately one-third who are prescribed an osteoporosis medication do not fill the new prescription. Reasons for the poor initiation and persistence are multiple.  The effect of the recent reports of potential long-term side effects of osteoporosis medications is unknown.

Methods: The Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) is an observational cohort through which survey data are collected annually from women aged ≥55 years old at baseline. The women were initially recruited from 17 regional sites in 10 different countries.

Results: Of 34,971 women that completed surveys in the fifth year, 3,735 were classified as osteoporosis prescription medication “stoppers” as they had been on an osteoporosis medication but stopped it in the past 2 years; whereas 175 were osteoporosis medication “non-starters” and never initiated an osteoporosis medication despite receiving a prescription from their physician. The majority (52%) of stoppers report they were instructed by their doctor to stop their medication. A large proportion also listed concerns of long-term risks associated with the medication(s) (36%) and a specific concern about effects on teeth or jaw (19%) as reasons for stopping (Table 1). For the non-starters, the majority (55%) listed possible side effects as their reason for not initiating an osteoporosis prescription medication, despite the recommendation from their physician (Table 2).

Conclusion: Osteoporosis medication adherence is known to be poor. Our findings reflect women’s concerns over possible long-term effects of these medications as a major contributor to not taking or starting these medications. However, most women that were taking medications in the past have stopped taking their osteoporosis medication per the instruction of their physician. These findings highlight increasing concerns of patients and their physicians about the safety of osteoporosis medications.

Table 1. Reasons for stopping osteoporosis medications

Reasons for Stopping

n (%)

Instructed by doctor

1947 (52)

Possible long-term risks

1327 (36)

Side effects

753 (20)

Bone density not improving

752 (20)

Taking a drug holiday, on it long enough

721 (19)

Concern about effects on teeth or jaw

693 (19)

Bone density improving

398 (11)

Efficacy (it wasn’t helping)

335 (9)

Too many other medications

247 (7)

Too expensive

182 (5)

Difficult to take as directed

174 (5)

Not covered by insurance

140 (4)

Table 2. Reasons for NOT starting osteoporosis medications

Reasons for NOT taking

n (%)

Possible side effects

97 (55)

Too many other medications

31 (18)

Efficacy (would not work)

23 (13)

Too difficult to take

18 (10)

Too expensive

16 (9)

Other

72 (41)

 


Disclosure:

A. H. Warriner,

Amylin/BMS,

2;

R. C. Outman,
None;

A. Wyman,
None;

F. H. Hooven,

Pfizer Inc,

2;

J. D. Adachi,

Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis,

5,

Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Warner Chilcott,

7,

Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis,

2;

R. Chapurlat,
None;

J. E. Compston,

Servier, Shire, Nycomed, Novartis, Amgen, Procter & Gamble, Wyeth, Pfizer, The Alliance for Better Bone Health, Roche and GlaxoSmithKline,

5,

Servier, Procter & Gamble and Lilly,

5,

Servier R&D (2007–2009), Procter & Gamble (2007–2009), Nycomed (2009–2012) and Acuitas (2009–2011),

2;

C. Cooper,
None;

J. R. Curtis,

Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie,

2,

Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie,

5;

A. Díez-Pérez,

Eli Lilly, Amgen, Procter & Gamble, Servier and Daiichi-Sankyo,

5,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Novartis, Eli Lilly, Amgen and Procter & Gamble,

6,

Novartis, Lilly, Amgen, Procter & Gamble and Roche,

5;

R. Lindsay,
None;

L. March,
None;

J. W. Nieves,
None;

K. G. Saag,

Amgen,

2,

Eli Lilly and Company,

2,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

2,

Amgen,

5,

Eli Lilly and Company,

5,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/osteoporosis-medication-adherence-reasons-for-stopping-and-not-starting/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology