ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1220

Oral Glucocorticoid Prescribing Patterns in UK Primary Care for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rachel J Black1,2, Rebecca M Joseph3,4, Mohammad Movahedi2, Mark Lunt2 and William G Dixon2,5, 1Department of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, 2Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 3Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 4NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Manchester, United Kingdom, 5Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Health e-Research Centre, Farr Institute for Health Informatics Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: glucocorticoids, primary care and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster II: Pathogenesis and Treatment of Systemic Inflammatory Diseases

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Oral glucocorticoids (GCs) are commonly used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although GPs don’t typically alter DMARD prescriptions, changes to GC therapy are commonly made in primary care. It is important to assess how GCs are used in this setting, including variability in dose and duration of treatment, so that rheumatologists understand how their patients are being treated.  The objective of this study was to describe the patterns of GC prescribing for patients with RA in primary care.

Methods:

Patients with incident RA were identified from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a large UK general practice database.  For patients who received GCs, the mean, minimum and maximum prednisolone equivalent doses were calculated. To determine the population distribution, the median of these values across all treated patients was then calculated. A GC course was defined as back-to-back GC prescriptions where the end date of the first prescription was not more than one calendar day different from the start date of the next prescription. The median number of courses per year was then determined. The proportion of patients to receive greater than 5mg, 10mg, 20mg, 30mg, 50mg and 75mg per day was determined as was the proportion of total time on GCs these doses were prescribed for.

Results:

Of the 16 536 patients with incident RA, 7749 patients (47%) received at least one GC prescription during the follow up period. The mean duration of follow up was 4.8 years per patient. In GC users, the median proportion of time spent on GCs was 24.3% (IQR 36.2%-64.2%). Of those receiving GCs, the population distribution was a median of 7.5mg per day (IQR 5-15.7mg) for the mean dose, 5mg per day (IQR 2.5-7.5mg) for the minimum dose and 15mg per day (IQR 7.5-30mg) for the maximum dose.

Of those that received GCs, the median number of courses per year was 1.4 (IQR 0.4-3.0) and 39.4% received more than 2 GC courses per year. The median duration of each GC course was 46 days (IQR 28-81).

Of those that were prescribed GCs during follow up, 79.9% received a prednisolone equivalent daily dose of more than 5mg per day and 56.2% received more than 10mg per day. 38.2% received more than 20mg per day, 17.3% received more than 30mg per day, 3.5% received more than 50mg per day and 1.4% received more than 75mg per day. The median proportion of total time on GCs that patients received these doses is shown in the table below.

 

Dose per day

Proportion of total time on GCs (%)

Median (IQR)

>5mg

58.0 (19.5-100)

>10mg

25.7 (5.5-100)

>20mg

20.0 (3.2-100)

>30mg

12.7 (2.3-66.7)

>50mg

5.6 (1.0-24.1)

>75mg

5.9 (1.0-28.8)

Conclusion: Half the patients with incident RA were prescribed GCs in primary care. They received GCs for 25% of the time they were observed. Of those who received GCs, 80% received doses greater than 5mg per day and 40% more than 20mg/day. Patients spent 60% of their total duration on GCs taking doses greater than 5mg per day. The extent of GC prescribing for RA patients in primary care may be surprising to many rheumatologists and highlights the need to be aware of GC use in this setting in order to avoid excess exposure and associated side effects.


Disclosure: R. J. Black, None; R. M. Joseph, None; M. Movahedi, None; M. Lunt, None; W. G. Dixon, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Black RJ, Joseph RM, Movahedi M, Lunt M, Dixon WG. Oral Glucocorticoid Prescribing Patterns in UK Primary Care for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/oral-glucocorticoid-prescribing-patterns-in-uk-primary-care-for-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/oral-glucocorticoid-prescribing-patterns-in-uk-primary-care-for-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology