ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2824

On Tapering Therapy for RA Patients in Clinical Remission; Flare on Csdmards Predicted By Clinical Features and Musculoskeletal Ultrasound, Whereas T-Cell Abnormalities Predictive for b-DMARD Tapering

Hanna Gul1, Frederique Ponchel2 and Paul Emery3, 1Rheumatology, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds & Leeds NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 3University of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, DMARDs, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ultrasound, T-Regulatory Cells

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: 5T089 ACR Abstract: RA–Treatments IV: Strategy (2820–2825)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose:

Tapering of disease-modifying therapy (DMARDs) is recommended by EULAR/ACR for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who achieve sustained remission on stable therapy. However, there is no guidance on how to manage this in clinical practice. We aimed to assess flare over 12 months in RA patients who were offered structured tapering of either conventional synthetic (cs) or biologic (b) DMARDs.

  Methods:

RA patients (ACR/EULAR 2010) prospectively attending a remission clinic were recruited when fulfilling the criteria of stable remission as defined by 3-variable DAS28<2.6 for >= 6 months (stable therapy & no corticosteroids). Patients were offered tapering according to a structured protocol (Figure 1). For patients receiving combination cs/b-DMARDs, only the b-DMARD was tapered. Clinical, ultrasound (US) + immunological (T-cell subsets: naive, Treg (both age-corrected) and inflammation related cells, IRC) data were collected. Flare over a period of 12 months was assessed using several definitions in order to evaluate their relevance for clinical outcomes. Associations with baseline characteristics were assessed using univariate statistics (Mann-Whitney-U and Chi-square). No correction for multiple testing was attempted.  

  Results:

98 patients (cs-DMARDs n=66, b-DMARDs n=32) accepted tapering and achieved at least 12 months follow-up. In the cs-DMARD group 55% were female; the median age was 64 years and median remission duration 25 months. For b-DMARDs 63% were female; the median age was 61 years and median remission duration 28 months. There was great heterogeneity in terms of flare rate according to the definitions used (Table 1). Tapering of b-DMARDs was associated with higher flare rate (29-70%) compared to cs-DMARDs (24-52%). Demographics were not associated with flare by any definition (except longer disease duration for cs-DMARD patients who lost Boolean remission status). Clinical (notably seropositivity) and US measures were associated with flare for cs-DMARDs. Reduced Treg and higher IRCs at baseline were associated with flare in patients tapering b-DMARDs.  

  Conclusion:

The flare rate varied with the definition used and was more common when tapering b-DMARDs compared to cs-DMARDs. Flare was predicted in the latter patients by clinical and US (including seropositivity) findings, whereas T-cell abnormalities predicted flare in b-DMARD patients. These results will help formulate further tapering strategies.

 

 

Table 1. Rate of flare according to different definitions and associations with baseline characteristics

Figure 1. Tapering Protocol

 

 

 


Disclosure: H. Gul, None; F. Ponchel, None; P. Emery, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gul H, Ponchel F, Emery P. On Tapering Therapy for RA Patients in Clinical Remission; Flare on Csdmards Predicted By Clinical Features and Musculoskeletal Ultrasound, Whereas T-Cell Abnormalities Predictive for b-DMARD Tapering [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/on-tapering-therapy-for-ra-patients-in-clinical-remission-flare-on-csdmards-predicted-by-clinical-features-and-musculoskeletal-ultrasound-whereas-t-cell-abnormalities-predictive-for-b-dmard-tapering/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/on-tapering-therapy-for-ra-patients-in-clinical-remission-flare-on-csdmards-predicted-by-clinical-features-and-musculoskeletal-ultrasound-whereas-t-cell-abnormalities-predictive-for-b-dmard-tapering/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology