ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 916

Novel Immunosignature Stratifies Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis into Distinct Disease Sub-Groups and Predicts Response to Anti-Tnfα Therapies

Laura Magill1, Marsilio Adriani1, Victoria Howard2, Jessica Manson2, Elizabeth Jury3 and Claudia Mauri4, 1University College London, London, United Kingdom, 2University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom, 3Division of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 4Division of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology Research, University College London, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, B cells, biomarkers and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: B Cell Biology and Targets in Autoimmune Disease I

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose:  Autoimmune rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), have multifactorial pathogenesis associated with failure of immune tolerance. Advances in understanding the disease immunopathology have led to the development of biological drugs targeting components of the immune response that drive disease progression (including TNFα, IL-6, and B cells). However, these drugs are not effective in all individuals and many patients fail to respond for unknown reasons. The ability to predict patient responses to conventional and to biological treatment would provide a crucial step change improvement in the clinical management of patients with RA. We proposed a novel immunophenotyping approach to identify unique ‘signatures’ that could stratify patients for a more personalised approach to treatment of this complex disease. 

Methods:  We optimised a novel high through-put immunophenotyping platform, LEGENDScreenTM, measuring the expression of 332 cell surface markers on B-cell and T-cell populations. We used this multi-dimensional approach to screen 50 RA patients, either treated with DMARDs or with anti-TNFα treatments, compared to patients with MS, SLE and healthy donors (HCs) as controls. The antigen-specific fluorescence intensity for each subset was examined. Differentially expressed markers (DEMs) between patient groups were determined using multiple unpaired t-test analysis (p<0.05). The results guided us to further stratify the data looking at B cell subsets, disease activity and immunogenicity (presence or absence ADA, measured by ELISA).

Results:  We identified phenotypic markers specific for anti-TNFα-treatment-naïve RA patients, developing an “immune-signature” that differentiates these patients from HCs, RA patients treated with anti-TNFα-treatment, and from patients with MS or SLE. We observed that the majority of DEMs, with significantly different expression between patient groups, were on CD19+ B-cells rather than CD4+T-cells, confirming the contribution of B-cells in the pathogenesis of RA. Comparing HCs to anti-TNFα-treatment-naïve patients we identified 31 DEMs that were significantly differentially expressed on B-cells but only 2 DEMs on T-cells. Further stratification of B-cells, looking at immature, mature, and memory subsets, identified 40 and 41 DEMs on immature and mature B-cells respectively, and only 20 DEMs on memory B-cells. We identified a unique immune-phenotype associated with the lack of response to anti-TNFa and the development of ADA.

Conclusion:  We have developed a new strategy, which clustered patients based on shared immune-phenotypes and distinguished between patients who developed anti-drug antibodies (ADA+) and those with active vs inactive disease. The predictive capacity of these immune-signatures is being validated in a prospective cohort of patients treated with anti-TNFα, which will also predict response to switching therapies (e.g. from anti-TNFα to rituximab). We proposed to use this novel immunophenotyping signature for a more personalised approach to treatment of this complex disease. Conducted as part of the ABIRISK consortium.


Disclosure: L. Magill, None; M. Adriani, None; V. Howard, None; J. Manson, None; E. Jury, None; C. Mauri, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Magill L, Adriani M, Howard V, Manson J, Jury E, Mauri C. Novel Immunosignature Stratifies Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis into Distinct Disease Sub-Groups and Predicts Response to Anti-Tnfα Therapies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/novel-immunosignature-stratifies-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-into-distinct-disease-sub-groups-and-predicts-response-to-anti-tnf%ce%b1-therapies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/novel-immunosignature-stratifies-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-into-distinct-disease-sub-groups-and-predicts-response-to-anti-tnf%ce%b1-therapies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology