ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 340

No Improvement in Time to Biopsy and Therapy in Lupus Nephritis Patients over Two Decades

Shivani Garg1, Sarah Panzer2, Tripti Singh2 and Christie M. Bartels3, 1Rheumatology/Medicine, University of Wisconsin- Madison, Madison, WI, 2Nephrology/ Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 3Rheumatology/Medicine, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lupus nephritis and time management

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Measures and Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Proteinuria and urinary casts are good indicators of lupus nephritis (LN) yet six different LN guidelines recommend kidney biopsy to confirm LN. Therefore, kidney biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing LN and initiating therapy. Recent studies report an average wait time to see a specialist of 50 days which can delay biopsy and therapy in LN. There is limited information on wait times for confirming diagnosis and starting therapy in LN patients. We aimed to examine time to biopsy and therapy in LN patients and compare over two decades. We hypothesized that time to biopsy has not changed but therapy choices would differ in the decade after ALMS trial.

Methods:

Our cohort study identified all incident LN patients with initial kidney biopsy from 1997-2017 at an academic center. Sociodemographics and reported details on the first biopsy in LN patients were abstracted from a comprehensive native kidney biopsy database. Biopsy reports were reviewed for LN class and chronicity as per International Society of Nephrology guidelines. Time to biopsy and therapy were defined as time from nephrology referral until biopsy, and time from biopsy until start or change in therapy respectively. Further, for two decades we compared change in time to biopsy over 1997-2007 vs. 2007-2017, rate of hospitalization while awaiting biopsy, and type of therapy initiated.

Results:

Among 175 incident LN patients with initial native kidney biopsies, 79% were female, 72% White with median age of 24 years (2-77 years). Median times to biopsy and therapy were 52 days (24-155 days) and 7 days (0-18 days) respectively. 13% of the patients were hospitalized during the wait period. Over two decades, there was no significant change in time to biopsy (Fig 1) or hospitalization rates. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed 4 times higher odds of starting MMF in LN patients in the latter decade (OR 3.5, CI 1.2,10.8 p=0.02).Type of therapy was independent of race, proliferative LN and chronicity (Table 1). Limitations include examining only LN patients with kidney biopsy, and no data on LN patients on MMF without biopsy.

Conclusion:

This is among the first studies to report wait times for diagnosing and starting therapy in LN (~60 days) with no improvement in the latter decade despite increased use of MMF after 2007. Observing wait times to undergo biopsy as a major barrier in provision of efficient care to LN patients we recommend system improvement strategies such as establishing multidisciplinary clinics. Future work will examine improvement in time to biopsy after establishing a multidisciplinary LN clinic.

 

Table 1. Odds of Mycophenolate Therapy Choice using Logistic Multivariate Regression Model

Variables

Multivariate OR (95% CI)

p-value

Biopsy after 2007

 3.50 (1.20,10.80)

0.02

Gender (Female)

 0.43 (0.11, 1.50 )

0.20

Lupus Duration >5 years

0.08 (0.01, 0.76)

0.03

Race (White vs non-White)

1.24( 0.36, 4.73)

0.74

LN (Proliferative vs non-proliferative)*

0.44 (0.13, 1.38)

0.17

Chronicity Present

0.67 (0.21,2.13)

0.49

* LN proliferative includes class 3,4 while non-proliferative includes classes 1,2,5

 


Disclosure: S. Garg, None; S. Panzer, None; T. Singh, None; C. M. Bartels, Pfizer, Inc., 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Garg S, Panzer S, Singh T, Bartels CM. No Improvement in Time to Biopsy and Therapy in Lupus Nephritis Patients over Two Decades [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/no-improvement-in-time-to-biopsy-and-therapy-in-lupus-nephritis-patients-over-two-decades/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/no-improvement-in-time-to-biopsy-and-therapy-in-lupus-nephritis-patients-over-two-decades/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology