ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1330

No Difference in Treatment Continuation of Different Biologics in Elderly Patients > 70 Years Compared to Younger Patients ≤ 65 Years

Anja Strangfeld1, Klaus Krüger 2, Bernhard Manger 3, Christian Kneitz 4, Angela Zink 5 and Martin Schaefer 6, 1German Rheumatism Research Center (DRFZ), Berlin, Germany, 2Rheumatologist, München, Germany, 3Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg. Department of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology. Erlangen. Germany., Erlangen, Germany, 4Rheumatologist, Schwerin, Germany, 5German Rheumatism Research Centre and Charité University medicine, Berlin, Germany, 6German Rheumatism Research Center, Berlin, Germany

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: lora, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and biologic drugs, yora

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II: Treatments, Outcomes, & Measures

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Due to demographic changes an increasing number of persons reach an age above 70 years. Therefore, the adequate therapy of elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an increasingly important topic. The aim of this study was to compare treatment continuation of several biologic (b)DMARDs in patients ≤ 65 with elderly patients > 70 years, stratified by onset of disease (young onset (< 65 years) and late onset (≥ 65 years)) and by seropositivity.

Methods: The German register RABBIT is a prospective longitudinally followed cohort of RA patients enrolled with a new start of a DMARD after at least one conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD failure. For the current analysis patients who were enrolled with a bDMARD between 01/2007 and 04/2018 were included. Kaplan Meier methods were applied to analyse treatment continuation.

Results: Among the 9,819 RA patients included in the analysis, 7,972 were ≤ 65 years old and 1,847 were older than 70 years (among them 180 patients above 80 years). Among the patients ≤ 65 years, 28% received a csDMARDs and 72% a bDMARD, while among the patients above 70 years, 35% received a csDMARDs and 65% a biological. Elderly patients with a young disease onset (YORA) were more frequently women and more frequently seropositive, on average had a higher number of prior csDMARD treatment failures, a worse physical function and were more likely to have joint erosions than elderly patients with late disease onset (LORA) (Table 1). On all bDMARD treatments investigated, elderly RA patients showed the same treatment continuation as seen in younger patients. While neither the age of the patients nor the age at disease onset changed the continuation of biologicals, patients being seronegative had a significantly lower continuation with rituximab and abatacept treatment, irrespective of age (Figure 1).

Conclusion: These results suggest that bDMARD treatment may be used for elderly patients with the same effectiveness as in younger patients.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients, stratified by age and disease onset.
Where not otherwise indicated numbers are mean -SD-

Figure 1. Treatment continuity in -A- TNF inhibitors, -B- abatacept and rituximab, -C- tocilizumab


Disclosure: A. Strangfeld, AbbVie, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda and UCB, 8; K. Krüger, Abbvie, BMS, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, 8; B. Manger, None; C. Kneitz, None; A. Zink, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche und UCB, 5, 8; M. Schaefer, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Strangfeld A, Krüger K, Manger B, Kneitz C, Zink A, Schaefer M. No Difference in Treatment Continuation of Different Biologics in Elderly Patients > 70 Years Compared to Younger Patients ≤ 65 Years [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/no-difference-in-treatment-continuation-of-different-biologics-in-elderly-patients-70-years-compared-to-younger-patients-%e2%89%a4-65-years/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/no-difference-in-treatment-continuation-of-different-biologics-in-elderly-patients-70-years-compared-to-younger-patients-%e2%89%a4-65-years/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology