ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2848

Network Meta-Analysis of Tumor Necrosis Factor, Interleukins, and Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibitor in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis

Vibeke Strand1, M. Elaine Husni2, William Reichmann3, Keith Betts4, Jenny Griffith5, Yan Song3, Marci Beppu6 and Arijit Ganguli5, 1Biopharmaceutical Consultant, Portola Valley, CA, 2Rheumatology Dept A50, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, 3Analysis Group Inc., Boston, MA, 4Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, 5AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 6Abbvie, Newcastle, WA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Adalimumab, anti-TNF therapy, interleukins (IL), meta-analysis and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Multiple disease-modifying therapies
for treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are available. However, there are limited
data directly comparing these biologic therapies and the recently approved phosphodiesterase-4
(PDE-4) inhibitor. In the absence of head-to-head trials, it is difficult for
decision makers to make treatment choices in real world scenarios. The aim of
this study was to conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) to indirectly compare
the efficacy of biologic agents and apremilast for treatment of active PsA.

Methods:

A
systematic literature review was conducted to identify Phase III randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi’s:
adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, etanercept, and certolizumab), interleukin
inhibitors (ustekinumab and secukinumab), and a PDE-4 inhibitor (apremilast)
for active PsA. The relative probabilities of
achieving ACR20 and PASI75 responses at week 24 with each agent were estimated
via a Bayesian network meta-analysis. All arms of the network meta-analysis
included FDA-approved doses for PsA except
secukinumab, where all three doses examined in RCTs: 75, 150, and 300 mg every
4 weeks were included. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated as the
reciprocal of the incremental response rate of each treatment versus placebo. Analyses
were repeated among subgroups of patients without prior biologic therapy.

Results:

Seventeen
RCTs were identified, 14 included ACR20 and/or PASI75 responses at Week 24. Among
all patients and biologic-naive patients, adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab,
and secukinumab (300 and 150 mg) had NNTs <3 for ACR20 responses at Week 24,
and adalimumab the lowest NNT of 2.32 (95% credible interval [CrI] 1.78, 3.22;
Figure 1). Among all patients and biologic-naive patients, infliximab,
golimumab, and adalimumab had NNTs <2 for PASI75 responses at Week 24, and
infliximab the lowest NNT of 1.53 (1.25, 2.01; Figure 2).  PASI75 responses among biologic-naïve
patients were not available for secukinumab, certolizumab, and apremilast.

Conclusion:

At Week 24,
adalimumab, golimumab, secukinumab 300 mg, and infliximab had the lowest NNTs
per ACR20 and/or PASI75 responders among all patients as well as among biologic-naïve
patients.

 

Figure 1. Numbers needed to treat to
achieve one additional ACR 20 responder

s

Figure 2. Numbers needed to treat to
achieve one additional PASI 75 responder

s

 


Disclosure: V. Strand, Abbvie, Alder, Amgen, Anthera, AstraZeneca, BiogenIdec, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, GSK, Janssen, MerckSerono, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Sanofi-Aventis, and UCB, 2; M. E. Husni, Celgene, Abbvie, Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, and Janssen, 9; W. Reichmann, Analysis Group, and received payment from AbbVie to assist with research, 3; K. Betts, Analysis Group, and received payment from AbbVie to assist with research, 3; J. Griffith, AbbVie, 3,AbbVie, 1; Y. Song, Analysis Group, and received payment from AbbVie to assist with research, 3; M. Beppu, AbbVie, 3,AbbVie, 1; A. Ganguli, AbbVie, Inc., 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Strand V, Husni ME, Reichmann W, Betts K, Griffith J, Song Y, Beppu M, Ganguli A. Network Meta-Analysis of Tumor Necrosis Factor, Interleukins, and Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibitor in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/network-meta-analysis-of-tumor-necrosis-factor-interleukins-and-phosphodiesterase-4-inhibitor-in-the-treatment-of-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/network-meta-analysis-of-tumor-necrosis-factor-interleukins-and-phosphodiesterase-4-inhibitor-in-the-treatment-of-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology