ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2005

Nailfold Capillaroscopy in Systemic Sclerosis: How Many Fingers Should be Examined to Detect Abnormality?

Graham Dinsdale1, Tonia Moore2, Neil O’Leary3, Michael Berks4, Chris Roberts3, Joanne Manning2, John Allen5, Marina E Anderson6, Maurizio Cutolo7, Roger Hesselstrand8, Kevin Howell9, Carmen Pizzorni7, Vanessa Smith10, Alberto Sulli11, Marie Wildt8, Christopher Taylor4, Andrea Murray1 and Ariane L. Herrick1,12, 1Division of Musculoskeletal & Dermatological Sciences, University of Manchester, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK, Salford, United Kingdom, 3Centre for Biostatistics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, Manchester, United Kingdom, 4Centre for Imaging Sciences, Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, Manchester, United Kingdom, 5Microvascular Diagnostics, Northern Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 6Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 7Research Laboratory and Academic Unit of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy, Genova, Italy, 8Department of Clinical Sciences, Section of Rheumatology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, Lund, Sweden, 9Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Campus, London, UK, London, United Kingdom, 10Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Faculty of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, Ghent, Belgium, 11Research Laboratory and Academic Unit of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy, Genoa, Italy, 12NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: nailfold capillaroscopy and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Nailfold capillaroscopy plays an important role in diagnosing systemic sclerosis (SSc), with abnormal nailfold capillary appearance being included in the 2013 ACR/EULAR diagnostic criteria [1]. Common queries from clinicians who assess patients with suspected SSc are: which finger(s) should be imaged, and how many digits in total, given that assessing 8 fingers (excluding thumbs) takes time in a busy clinical practice? Our aim was to demonstrate the sensitivity of assessing different (combinations of) fingers for the presence of two markers of capillary abnormality: (1) presence of giant capillaries, and (2) overall image grade, compared to assessment of all 8 fingers.

Methods:

Nailfold images (all fingers from each of 101 patients with SSc) and subsequent multi-observer assessments from a large study of quantitative capillaroscopy [2] were characterised by digit. Using custom software, observers counted giant vessels and graded the image overall (including normal/early/active/late). Patients were defined as “true case” for each of 2 parameters (giants, and image grade) if at least one of 8 fingers tested positive for the parameter (i.e. ≥ 1 giant vessels in one or more fingers, or one or more fingers given an ‘abnormal’ [early/active/late] grade). Seven single-finger, or finger combinations (derived from the middle and ring fingers), were then tested for sensitivity of achieving the correct result against the 8-finger “gold standard” true cases.

Results:

For each of seven combinations of finger(s), sensitivity percentages for the two parameters are shown in Table 1. For the 8-finger “gold standard”, sensitivity against the diagnostic criteria was 53.0% (71 +ve cases from 134 assessments) and 73.1% (98 +ve cases from 134 assessments) for presence of giants and image grade, respectively. Pairs of fingers have higher sensitivity than single fingers in all cases, and the 4-finger combination shows a sensitivity of 85.9% and 91.8% for giants and image grade, respectively.

Conclusion:

1. Assessing only middle and ring fingers on both hands detects abnormality in 85-90% of cases of established SSc (halving imaging time).

2. Assessing only ring fingers (sensitivity 73-80%) brings a 75% reduction in imaging time.

3. Some cases of abnormality will be missed by not examining all fingers.

References

  1. Van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72: 1747-55.
  2. Dinsdale G, Moore T, O’Leary N, et al. Microvascular Res 2017; 112: 1-6.

Table 1. Sensitivity values for two nailfold capillary parameters (presence of giants, and image grade).

Presence of giant capillaries

(71 assessments from 42 patients)

Abnormal image grade

(98 assessments from 58 patients)

Finger(s)

Frequency

(%)

Frequency

(%)

Ring Left

40

56.3

63

64.3

Ring Right

32

45.1

58

59.2

Either Ring

52

73.2

79

80.6

Middle Left

32

45.1

55

56.1

Middle Right

23

32.4

44

44.9

Either Middle

40

56.3

72

73.5

Any Middle or Ring

61

85.9

90

91.8


Disclosure: G. Dinsdale, None; T. Moore, None; N. O’Leary, None; M. Berks, None; C. Roberts, None; J. Manning, None; J. Allen, None; M. E. Anderson, None; M. Cutolo, None; R. Hesselstrand, None; K. Howell, None; C. Pizzorni, None; V. Smith, None; A. Sulli, None; M. Wildt, None; C. Taylor, None; A. Murray, None; A. L. Herrick, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dinsdale G, Moore T, O’Leary N, Berks M, Roberts C, Manning J, Allen J, Anderson ME, Cutolo M, Hesselstrand R, Howell K, Pizzorni C, Smith V, Sulli A, Wildt M, Taylor C, Murray A, Herrick AL. Nailfold Capillaroscopy in Systemic Sclerosis: How Many Fingers Should be Examined to Detect Abnormality? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/nailfold-capillaroscopy-in-systemic-sclerosis-how-many-fingers-should-be-examined-to-detect-abnormality/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/nailfold-capillaroscopy-in-systemic-sclerosis-how-many-fingers-should-be-examined-to-detect-abnormality/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology