ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1931

Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) Use in Scleroderma Patients with Pulmonary  Hypertension: Observations from the Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment and Recognition of Outcomes in Scleroderma Cohort

Lesley Ann Saketkoo1, Matthew R. Lammi2, Aryeh Fischer3, Jerry A. Molitor4 and Virginia D. Steen5, 1Scleroderma and Sarcoidosis Patient Care and Research Center, Rheumatology and Pulmonary Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, 2Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Pulmonary and Critical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 3Rheumatology / ILD Program, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 4Rheumatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 5Department of Rheumatology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: mycophenolate mofetil, Pulmonary Involvement, registry, scleroderma and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes and Raynaud's - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics II: Approaches to Cardiac and Vascular Manifestations in Systemic Sclerosis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) related pulmonary hypertension (PH) carries a high mortality and patients with SSc-PH related to restrictive lung disease having an even worse prognosis.  Speculation regarding the potential of MMF to exert anti-fibrotic and anti-remodeling effects on parenchymal lung and vascular intimal fibrosis, led us to query the possible differences in outcomes and survival between 4 groups based on forced vital capacity (FVC) and use of MMF in SSc PH.

Methods: PHAROS is a prospective registry designed to provide substantive data to recognize aspects of PH unique to SSc.  For  this analysis patients were stratified by an FVC of >70% or ≤ 70% predicted on spirometry at the time of PH diagnosis by right heart catheterization (RHC ) and then by MMF use greater than 6 months after the  diagnosis of  PH. Cyclophosphamide use was exclusionary to all groups. Calculations are derived from one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post test or Kruskal Wallis with Dunn’s post-test. Categorical variables were compared with Chi square.  These analyses were followed by Cox and stepwise backward regression analysis to assess baseline characteristics associated with risk of death and Kaplan-Meyer analysis. 

Results:   256 cases from the PHAROS database matched criteria and had baseline spirometry results coincident with diagnostic RHC, of those 173 had a baseline FVC of >70% with 23 on MMF and 150 without; and 83 had a baseline FVC≤70% with 26 on MMF and 57 without.  Across groups, no differences were found in age, disease duration, racial distribution nor surprisingly in skin score, 6 minute walk test for distance or NYHA Class.   No detectable differences were found between groups in 6-18 month interval change from baseline FVC% in MMF- groups or from post-RHC initiation of MMF in the MMF+ groups.  Of interest, baseline mPAP and PVR were lower in both MMF+ groups regardless of FVC.  Though survival is numerically worst with FVC<70 without MMF at 4 years, it did not quite reach statistical significance in Kaplan-Meier analysis at 4 (p=0.06) or 3 years (p=0.08). Survival for both MMF groups was between 70% and 82% but only 56% for the patients with a low FVC not treated with MMF.  Male sex was a significant independent predictor of death in all groups especially when FVC was <70%.

ACR 2014 PHAROS MMF in RESTRICTIVE LUNG DISEASE Table 1.jpg

ACR 2014 PHAROS MMF in RESTRICTIVE LUNG DISEASE Diagram 1.jpg

Conclusion:  The trend for improved survival in patients with PH with FVC <70 who were treated with MMF even in the absence of improvement of FVC is intriguing.  Whether it has an effect on pulmonary artery remodeling should be considered.  These findings warrant prospective controlled investigations of MMF in SSc PH particularly in those with restrictive lung disease.


Disclosure:

L. A. Saketkoo,
None;

M. R. Lammi,
None;

A. Fischer,

Actelion Pharmaceuticals US,

5,

Gilead Sciences,

5,

InterMune,

5,

Gilead Sciences,

8;

J. A. Molitor,

UCB,

2,

Actekion,

2;

V. D. Steen,

Actelion Pharmaceuticals US,

8,

United Therapeutics,

5,

Gilead Science,

8,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

2,

Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical,

2,

CSL Berhing,

2,

Intermune,

2,

Bayer,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mycophenolate-mofetil-mmf-use-in-scleroderma-patients-with-pulmonary-hypertension-observations-from-the-pulmonary-hypertension-assessment-and-recognition-of-outcomes-in-scleroderma-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology