ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2611

Multidrug Resistant AxSpA: No Advantage of Switching Class in Patients with Inadequate Response to Two Prior TNFi Agents

Sevket Ercan Tunc1, Ismail Sari1, Robert D Inman2 and Nigil Haroon2, 1Rheumatology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Spondylitis Clinic, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Rheumatology, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic agents, Clinical Response and axial spondyloarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Lack of efficacy (LOE) to TNF inhibitor (TNFi) treatments is an important issue and can be seen in up to 40% of the patients with axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA). In patients with LOE, further treatment responses have been reported to be lower: 6 month BASDAI 50% response rates of 37% for a 2nd TNFi and 30% for a 3rd TNFi. Secukinumab, an IL-17 inhibitor (IL-17i) is a relatively new treatment option for patients with active axSpA. However, there are currently limited data regarding the treatment responses in inadequate responders to ≥2 prior TNFi agents.

We aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of patients switching to TNFi or IL-17i following LOE to ≥2 TNFi.

Methods: Patients who fulfilled ASAS classification criteria for axSpA and who were on the 3rd or 4th biologic because of LOE to prior biologic treatments were identified. Patients who discontinued prior biologics because of intolerance or financial reasons were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the class of most recent biologic: TNFi or IL-17i. Demographic and clinical data including disease activity scores were collected from the database. Treatment responses at 6 months were compared between the groups. Good response was defined as ≥2 unit or ≥50% decrease in BASDAI. Other outcome measures assessed include clinically important improvement (CII; Δ≥1.1) and major improvement (ASDAS-MI; Δ≥2.0) in ASDAS-CRP.

Results: There were 106 patients (89 AS, 17 nr-axSpA) on a 3rd or 4th course of biologic medication following LOE to former biologic agents. Overall, 34 patients were on IL-17i and 72 on TNFi. Baseline demographics and clinical parameters are presented in Table 1. In the IL-17i group there were more patients with psoriasis and only one with IBD. There was no significant difference in other parameters between groups. The response rates were similar in IL-17i and TNFi treated patients (Table2). BASDAI ≥2 response rates were 15.2% for IL-17i and 14.8% for TNFi. ASDAS-CII was seen in 3.0% for IL-17i and 11.7% for TNFi. No patients achieved ASDAS-MI and there was no significant difference between sexes in the analysis.

Table:1 Baseline demographics and clinical parameters of 3rd and 4th biologic users

TNFi group

(n:72)

IL-17i group

(n:34)

p value

Sex, male, n (%)

48 (66.7%)

21 (61.8%)

0.67

Age (mean±SD)

39.2±13.6

40.0±11.3

0.79

Dis. Duration (mean±SD)

16.2±11.6

19.3±10.3

0.21

Baseline ESR (mean±SD)

13.2±18.2

17.1±16.3

0.32

AS, n (%)

60 (83.3)

29 (85.3)

0.52

Nr-axSpA, n (%)

12 (16.7)

5 (14.7)

0.52

HLA B27 +, n (%)

50 (69.4)

25 (73.5)

0.43

Baseline CRP (mean±SD)

10.3±18.9

10.65±21.7

0.93

Baseline BASDAI (mean±SD)

6.04±1.7

6.3±1.5

0.47

Baseline TBP (mean±SD)

6.3±2.1

6.9±1.8

0.12

Baseline PGA (mean±SD)

6.3±2.2

6.7±1.8

0.37

Baseline BASDAI

6.0±1.7

6.3±1.5

0.47

Baseline ASDAS ESR

3.0±0.9

3.3±0.8

0.07

Baseline ASDAS CRP

3.3±0.9

3.5±0.8

0.30

Arthritis, n (%)

63 (87.5)

32 (94.1)

0.24

IBD, n (%)

14 (19.4)

1 (2.9)

0.017

Psoriasis, n (%)

11 (15.3)

11 (32.4)

0.04

Enthesitis n (%)

35 (48.6)

20 (58.8)

0.40

Uveitis, n (%)

27 (37.5)

13 (38.2)

0.56

F. History of SpA, n (%)

17 (23.6)

6 (17.6)

0.34

Smoking History, n (%)

32 (44.4)

13 (38.2)

0.35

Table 2: Clinical response rates of 3rd and 4th biologic users

TNFi group (n:60)

IL-17i group (n:33)

p value

BASDAI ≥2 unit, n (%)

9 (14.8)

5 (15.2)

0.59

BASDAI 50 n (%)

3 (4.9)

2 (6.1)

0.58

CII ASDAS CRP, n (%)

7 (11.7)

1 (3.0)

0.25

CII: Clinically Important Improvement; Δ≥1.1 in ASDAS CRP.

There were no patients with major improvement.

Conclusion: Clinical response rates to a 3rd or 4th biologic, regardless of class, were low in AxSpA patients.


Disclosure: S. E. Tunc, None; I. Sari, None; R. D. Inman, None; N. Haroon, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tunc SE, Sari I, Inman RD, Haroon N. Multidrug Resistant AxSpA: No Advantage of Switching Class in Patients with Inadequate Response to Two Prior TNFi Agents [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/multidrug-resistant-axspa-no-advantage-of-switching-class-in-patients-with-inadequate-response-to-two-prior-tnfi-agents/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/multidrug-resistant-axspa-no-advantage-of-switching-class-in-patients-with-inadequate-response-to-two-prior-tnfi-agents/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology