ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2261

Motivations For Inadequate Persistence With Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs In Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Patient’s Perspective

Virginia Pascual-Ramos and Irazú Contreras-Yáñez, Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Compliance and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis-Clinical Aspects III: Outcome Measures, Socioeconomy, Screening, Biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Knowledge of factors that contribute to non-persistence with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (NP-DMARDs) is essential to improve rheumatoid arthritis (RA) outcomes. Aims of the study were to investigate patient’s motivations and risk factors for NP-DMARDs in a cohort of early Mexican Mestizos patients with RA and traditional DMARDs.

Methods:

 Up to September 2012, data from 149 patients (93% of the entire cohort), who had at least 1 year of follow-up, and one DMARD indication, and 2 consecutive six-months-apart rheumatic evaluations that included assessment of compliance with treatment were reviewed. Compliance was evaluated according to a 22-items questionnaire locally designed that evaluates among others NP-DMARDs and patient´s motivations of NP-DMARDs. Patients had partial health coverage and pay for their medication.

Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used. All statistical tests were 2-sided and evaluated at the 0.05 significance level. The study was approved by the internal review board. Written informed consent was obtained.

Results:

Up to cut-off, 715 questionnaires were applied to 149 patients, who had (mean ± SD) follow-up of 58.7 ± 27.9 months and were indicated (mean±SD) DMARDs/patient/follow-up of 2.4±0.7.

Patients were most frequently female (88.6%), middle-aged ([mean±SD] age of 38.5±12.8 years) with lower-middle/lower socio-economic status (87.9%) and (mean±SD) scholarship of 11±3.9 years. 

Ninety-nine (66.4%) patients were NP-DMARDs and filled 330 questionnaires. Multivariate analysis showed that years of formal education (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.1-1.24, p=0.03), perception of at least some difficulty to find arthritis medication (OR: 5.68, 95% CI: 2.48-13, p=0.000) and perception that arthritis medication is expensive (OR: 5.27, 95% CI: 2.1-13.84, p=0.001) at the first evaluation of patient´s compliance were all predictor of NP-DMARDs.

Among the 99 NP-DMARDs patients, 25 (25.3%) were recurrent-NP-DMARDs and accumulated more disease activity than their counterparts ([mean±SD cumulative DAS28] 3.7±2 vs. 2.9±1.7, p=0.04). Also, DAS28 remission was lower among recurrent-NP patients (8 vs. 45, p=0.002).

Combination of both reasons of NP-DMARDs (“Because it was not available at the drugstore” and “Because the medication is very expensive”) when selected by the patient at the first evaluation of compliance was the only variable to predict recurrent NP-DMARD, OR: 4.8, 95%CI: 1.1-20.8, p=0.04. 

Conclusion:

Health systems should provide (first line) treatment for RA as a strategy to improve compliance with therapy and clinical outcomes, particularly in vulnerable populations.


Disclosure:

V. Pascual-Ramos,
None;

I. Contreras-Yáñez,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/motivations-for-inadequate-persistence-with-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs-in-early-rheumatoid-arthritis-the-patients-perspective/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology