ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3065

Mortality in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Interstitial Lung Disease Treated with First Line TNFi or Rituximab Therapies

Katie Druce1, Kundan Iqbal2, Kath Watson1, Deborah P.M. Symmons1, Kimme L. Hyrich1 and Clive Kelly3, 1Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom, 3Rheumatology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, morbidity and mortality and rituximab

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health II: Obesity, Cancer and Mortality

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Mortality in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Interstitial Lung Disease Treated With First Line TNFi or Rituximab Therapies Druce KL, Iqbal K, Watson K, Symmons DPM Hyrich KL, Kelly C on behalf of the BSRBR-RA

Background/Purpose: Pulmonary involvement, including interstitial lung disease (ILD), is common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is associated with increased mortality. Early reports suggested that TNFα inhibitors (TNFi) may be linked to the development, or exacerbation, of ILD, and in response, in 2005 the British Society for Rheumatology advised caution in their use for patients with RA-ILD. In contrast, no comparable recommendations have been provided for rituximab (RTX), which is often used where contra-indications for TNFi exist. This study aimed to examine 5-year mortality in patients with RA-ILD starting either RTX or TNFi as their first biologic therapy for RA.

Methods: Participants in the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for RA with clinician reported RA-ILD at baseline starting either TNFi or RTX as their first biologic for RA were included in this analysis. Date and cause of death were captured on regular study follow-up forms and through linkage with the UK National Death Register. Death rates, per 1000 person years (pyrs) were calculated (95% CI); censoring occurred at death, 12/6/2015, or 5 years following first registration, whichever came first. The frequency with which ILD was mentioned on death certificates was examined. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated, with risk comparisons made between the RTX and TNFi cohorts using Cox regression using an ever exposed model, adjusted for potential confounders. Eligibility of confounders was determined by clinically relevant justification or statistical significance (p<0.05), after adjustment for treatment effects.

Results: Of 353 eligible RA participants with RA-ILD, 310 were treated with TNFi (all recruited before 2008) and 43 were treated with RTX patients (all recruited after 2008). During the first 5 years of follow-up,  there were 76 deaths in 804.9 pyrs observed in the TNFi cohort and 8 deaths in 156.7 pyrs in the RTX cohort; death rates were 94.4 (74.4-118.1) and 51.0 (22.0-100.5) per 1000 pyrs, respectively. ILD was recorded on 36.5% of the 74 available death certificates from the TNFi cohort and all of the three certificates available in RTX cohort. The unadjusted mortality risk in the RTX treated patients was numerically half that in the TNFi treated patients, although this was not statistically significant (HR 0.51, 95%CI 0.25-1.06; Figure 1). Adjustment for baseline age, sex, disability, disease activity, and disease duration made little difference to the estimate (0.50, 0.23-1.08).

Figure 1 – Kaplan-Meier survival curves for death following exposure to TNFi or RTX over the first 5 years following therapy commencement, within an intention to treat analysis.  

Conclusion: Patients who were selected to receive RTX as their first biologic for RA appeared to have better long-term survival compared to patients who had received TNFi, although this difference was not statistically significant. Absence of information on severity or subtype of ILD prevents drawing conclusions regarding the relative safety of these 2 therapies for RA-ILD and more detailed analysis in a larger dataset should be undertaken.  


Disclosure: K. Druce, None; K. Iqbal, None; K. Watson, None; D. P. M. Symmons, None; K. L. Hyrich, Abbvie, 9,Pfizer Inc, 9; C. Kelly, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Druce K, Iqbal K, Watson K, Symmons DPM, Hyrich KL, Kelly C. Mortality in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Interstitial Lung Disease Treated with First Line TNFi or Rituximab Therapies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mortality-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-interstitial-lung-disease-treated-with-first-line-tnfi-or-rituximab-therapies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mortality-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-interstitial-lung-disease-treated-with-first-line-tnfi-or-rituximab-therapies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology