ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0582

Mortality and Cost of Hospitalization: Do Hospitals Caring for More SLE Patients Perform Better?

Christine Anastasiou1, Laura Trupin1, Patricia Katz2, Zara Izadi3, Milena Gianfrancesco1, Gabriela Schmajuk4 and Jinoos Yazdany5, 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2University of California, San Francisco, Novato, CA, 3University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 4University of California, San Francisco, Atherton, CA, 5UCSF, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Cost-Effectiveness, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Health Services Research Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have an increased risk of hospitalization throughout their lifetime, potentially leading to higher patient mortality and healthcare costs. Establishing minimum volume thresholds for other medical and surgical conditions has been proposed as a way to improve outcomes. We evaluated the relationship between a hospital’s yearly SLE volume and two outcomes: mortality and cost of hospitalization.

Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), which after weighting provides annual estimates for more than 35 million community hospitalizations in the US. Analysis was limited to adults without missing relevant variables hospitalized in 2017. Admissions with SLE were captured in ICD-10-CM codes (M32.1x, M32.8, M32.9). Hospital specific costs were obtained using NIS cost-to-charge ratio files. We used linear regression to model average cost for admissions with a diagnosis of SLE based on the number of yearly SLE discharges at the treating hospital (analysis conducted with continuous variable of SLE volume per year, and repeated with a categorical variable establishing 50 or more SLE discharges yearly), controlling for the Ward systemic lupus-specific risk adjustment index1 modified for ICD-10, demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity), health insurance, income quartile in the ZIP Code of residence, and hospital characteristics (bed size, rural/urban/teaching status). In addition, we used Poisson regression to model mortality risk based on hospital SLE volume and the covariates listed above. All analyses accounted for the complex sampling design of the NIS.

Results: Adults with SLE included in the analysis accounted for a nationally estimated 172,135 discharges in 2017 (0.48% of all hospital discharges). Mean cost per SLE discharge was $14,420 (SE $207); 2% of hospitalizations resulted in death. In adjusted analysis, cost per SLE discharge was higher for hospitals caring for more SLE patients per year. Approximately 18.6% of included hospitals had a yearly SLE volume greater than 50. Hospitals with a yearly SLE volume greater than 50 had a higher average cost per SLE discharge compared to those with an SLE volume less than 50 (cost difference $3,399; 95% CI $1,803 to $4,996). Risk of inpatient mortality did not significantly vary based on SLE hospital volume.

Conclusion: Higher yearly SLE hospital volume was associated with greater cost per discharge, without significant differences in mortality rates compared to hospitals with lower SLE volumes. If the lupus-specific risk adjustment index we used does not fully capture patient disease severity or if there were coding differences between hospitals, this could have potentially affected the results. Our findings do not suggest a minimum volume threshold for SLE care that can be used to improve inpatient outcomes.

Reference: 1. Ward, MM. Development and testing of a systemic lupus-specific risk adjustment index for in-hospital mortality. J Rheumatol 2000; 27(6):1408-1413.


Disclosure: C. Anastasiou, None; L. Trupin, None; P. Katz, None; Z. Izadi, None; M. Gianfrancesco, None; G. Schmajuk, None; J. Yazdany, Eli Lilly, 5, Astra Zeneca, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Anastasiou C, Trupin L, Katz P, Izadi Z, Gianfrancesco M, Schmajuk G, Yazdany J. Mortality and Cost of Hospitalization: Do Hospitals Caring for More SLE Patients Perform Better? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mortality-and-cost-of-hospitalization-do-hospitals-caring-for-more-sle-patients-perform-better/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mortality-and-cost-of-hospitalization-do-hospitals-caring-for-more-sle-patients-perform-better/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology