ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2846

Modifications to Biologic Therapy and Economic Implications in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients

Jacqueline B. Palmer, Yunfeng Li, Vivian Herrera, Minlei Liao and Zafer Ozturk, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Biologics and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Limited information exists on the long term real-world treatment patterns of biologics for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the US population. We assessed medication persistence and drug switching with biologics in PsA and estimated the economic costs of different treatment sequences.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical and pharmacy claims data from the MarketScan database (United States).  The study included PsA patients >= 18 years of age, biologic-naïve (no biologic therapy in the previous 6 months), who initiated a biologic during the period from October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010 and were continuously enrolled in a medical and pharmacy benefits program for a 3-year follow-up period. Treatment persistence, switching, modification of treatment (i.e., biologic dose adjustment or any change in concomitant DMARD therapy), and medical and pharmacy costs were analyzed for each line of biologic therapy during the  3 year follow-up period. Line of therapy was defined by the number of biologics a patient used in the follow-up peroid.

Results: Among the 990 PsA patients identified 89.0% of patients used only one line of biologic, 7.3% had a second-line biologic, and 3.7% tried 3 or more lines of biologic therapy. For all the lines of therapy, the first biologics used were: etanercept (n = 435; 43.9%), adalimumab (n = 437; 44.1%), infliximab (n = 77; 7.8%), and golimumab (n = 41; 4.1%).  The discontinuation rates by line of therapy were as follows: 71.6% (n = 631) for patients who only used one line of biologics; 50.0% (n = 36) for those with second-line biologic and 18.9% (n = 7) for those who tried 3 or more biologics.The time patients spent on the first biologic was shorter  for those who switched to a second-line biologic (348 days) or third-line biologic (325 days) compared to those those who only used one biologic (522 days). Overall time to treatment modification became shorter with each line of therapy; the shortest was 42 days for patient on their third line of therapy, 137 days for those on their second line, and 146 days in the first line. The most common treatment modifications in the first-line of biologic therapy were DMARD dose increase (21.1%), add-on (9.0%) and removal (7.4%). Monthly medical costs (hospitalizations, office visits, emergency department visits) per member per month were higher for patients using only one line of biologic ($322) than for those who received second-line ($167) or third-line ($217) treatment, whereas monthly pharmacy costs per member per month were lower for patients using only one line of  biologic ($1985) than for those on second-line ($2045) or third-line ($2539) biologics.

Conclusion: Approximately two thirds of PsA patients discontinued their first biologic therapy. Of those who were continuous users and and moved on to second- and third-line therapies, the time of discontinuation from their  first-biologic was shorter, indicating non-responders were identified early in the treatment course. Monthly medical costs were higher for those who did not switch biologic therapy, but pharmacy costs increased with the number of biologic switches. This may be because of treatment add-ons or worsening disease severity.


Disclosure: J. B. Palmer, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 3; Y. Li, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 3; V. Herrera, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 1,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 3; M. Liao, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 3; Z. Ozturk, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Palmer JB, Li Y, Herrera V, Liao M, Ozturk Z. Modifications to Biologic Therapy and Economic Implications in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/modifications-to-biologic-therapy-and-economic-implications-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/modifications-to-biologic-therapy-and-economic-implications-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology