ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1056

Mind-Body Skills Training and Supportive Counseling for Depression in SLE: Positive Effects in a Randomized Controlled Trial

Carol Greco1, Ling-Wan Chen2, Yu Cheng3, Christine McFarland4 and Susan Manzi5, 1Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 3Statistics and Psychiatry, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, Pittsburgh, PA, 4Psychiatry, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, Pittsburgh, PA, 5Lupus Center of Excellence, West Penn Allegheny Health System, Pittsburgh, PA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, mindfulness, psychosocial and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: ARHP II: Healthcare Disparities and and Psychosocial Impact on Rheumatic Disease

Session Type: ARHP Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Although depressive symptoms are prevalent in persons with SLE, no studies to date have evaluated psychotherapy approaches in persons with SLE who also have comorbid depression.

Methods: Ninety persons with SLE with comorbid depression were randomly assigned to receive 8 weekly individual sessions and 3 monthly booster sessions of Mind-Body Skills Training (MBST, n=45) or Supportive Counseling/Symptom Monitoring (SCSM, n=45). SLE was defined by 1997 ACR criteria and depression was defined by Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology – clinician interview version (QIDS-C) diagnostic criteria and Center for Epidemiology Studies Depression (CESD) scale score of >/=16. The MBST protocol included elements of cognitive-behavioral therapy and mindfulness meditation methods and principles. The SCSM protocol resembled traditional supportive, non-directive counseling but with a focus on topics of particular interest to persons with SLE, such as living with chronic illness, and communication with family and heathcare providers. Both interventions included information on SLE and depression as well as goal setting, and were delivered by trained, experienced psychotherapists. Participants completed study evaluations at baseline, mid-treatment, end of intervention, and 6 and 12 month follow-up. Mental health outcomes (CESD, QIDS) are reported here. Data were analyzed using generalized mixed effects models.

Results: The average age of participants was 49 years (+/- 12), 92% were females, and 23% were African American or other non-white race. Of the 90 persons enrolled, 73 (81%) completed the study. Levels of depressive symptoms in the two groups did not differ at baseline, and were in the range of moderate to severe (MBST CESD=29.7 +/- 6.4, SCSM CESD=30 +/- 6; MBST QIDS=12 +/- 3.4, SCSM QIDS=11.6 +/- 3). Both MBST and SCSM resulted in improvement in self-reported depressive symptoms (CESD) [time effect F(4,286)=44, p<.001] with a marginally significant group x time effect in favor of SCSM [F(4,286)=2, p=.07]. Likewise, both groups improved on QIDS [time effect F(4,284) = 78, p<.001], and there was not a significant group x time effect. At the 12 month follow-up evaluation, CESD scores averaged 21.3 (SD=8) for MBST and 20.2 (SD=6.5) for SCSM, indicating that, despite improvement, participants continued to report some symptoms consistent with depression and/or chronic illness. QIDS scores at 12 month follow up averaged 5.5 (SD=4.6) for MBST and 3.6 (SD=2.6) for SCSM, which is consistent with ‘no’ to ‘mild’ depression.

Conclusion: We found that both MBST and SCSM resulted in improvement in depressive symptoms in persons with SLE. Skills training was not superior to supportive counseling. Clinical diagnostic interviews indicated ‘no depression’ to ‘mild’ levels of depression at follow-up, whereas participants continued to self-report symptoms at follow-up, perhaps due to overlap between SLE and depressive symptoms such as lack of energy and difficulty concentrating. Psychotherapy approaches tailored to SLE may benefit many SLE patients who experience comorbid depression.


Disclosure: C. Greco, None; L. W. Chen, None; Y. Cheng, None; C. McFarland, None; S. Manzi, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Greco C, Chen LW, Cheng Y, McFarland C, Manzi S. Mind-Body Skills Training and Supportive Counseling for Depression in SLE: Positive Effects in a Randomized Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mind-body-skills-training-and-supportive-counseling-for-depression-in-sle-positive-effects-in-a-randomized-controlled-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mind-body-skills-training-and-supportive-counseling-for-depression-in-sle-positive-effects-in-a-randomized-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology