ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 15

Methodology and Systematic Review of the Literature for the Mcmaster RARE-Best Practice Clinical Practice Guideline on Diagnosis and Management of the Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Kimberly Legault1, Christopher Hillis1, Cindy Yeung1, Elie Akl2, Marc Carrier3, Ricard Cervera4, Mark Crowther1, Francesco Dentali5, Doruk Erkan6, Gerard Espinosa7, Munther A Khamashta8, Joerg Meerpohl9, Karen Moffatt10, Sarah O'Brien11, Vittorio Pengo12, Jacob Rand13, Ignasi Rodriguez14, Lisa Thom15, Holger Schunemann1 and Alfonso Iorio1, 1McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 2American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon, 3University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 4Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Institut Clínic de Medicina i Dermatologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 5Insubria University, Insubria, Italy, 6Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 7Autoimmune Diseases Department. Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 8Graham Hughes Lupus Research Laboratory, The Rayne Institute, London, United Kingdom, 9University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, 10Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 11Nationwide Children's, Columbus, OH, 12Azienda Ospedaliera of Padova, University of Padova, Padova, Italy, 13NY Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, 14Rheumatology, Hospital Clinica, Barcelona, Spain, 15None (patient representative), Oxford, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Antiphospholipid antibodies, antiphospholipid syndrome, catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome and clinical practice guidelines

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Antiphospholipid Syndrome Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS), a rare disease, is characterized by the rapid onset of widespread thrombosis associated with multi-organ failure in patients meeting the serological criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome. To date, the diagnosis and treatment for CAPS has been based on expert consensus and case-series, not evidence-based guidelines developed with rigorous methodology. One of the main obstacles to guideline development in rare diseases is the sparsity and very low certainty (or quality) of the available evidence. As a prototypical rare disease, CAPS was selected to pilot the application of a guideline development process to a rare disease.

Methods:

The RARE-BestPractices project group in partnership with McMaster University developed a clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and management of patients with CAPS, bringing together a panel of international experts, and using the GIN-McMaster Guideline Development checklist. The evidence for the CAPS guideline was summarized using the GRADE methodology framework. Two novel methods, systematic observation reporting forms and ad hoc registry data analysis, were implemented to supplement the available evidence.

Systematic observation reporting involved collecting standardized contributions from each panel member prior to the panel meeting regarding characteristics and clinical course of previous CAPS patients. The goal was to systematize the process of expert input based on actual experience rather than opinions or anecdotes. Ad hoc analysis of registry data involved calculating raw data for survival estimates for each therapy question from the ‘CAPS Registry’, an international database that has over 500 CAPS patients enrolled.

Results:

Question generation yielded 47 questions, which were prioritized. The top 10 questions were selected by the panel for the guideline process, 3 diagnosis and 7 therapy. The therapy search identified 671 references, of which 8 articles were included in the systematic reviews. The diagnosis search identified 519 references, of which 1 article was included. All of the included studies were considered to be at high risk of bias. Eleven of the 20 panel members submitted systematic observation forms, representing 55 patient cases. The CAPS registry was used to calculate raw mortality for 7 recommendations and impacted the panel’s decision for a treatment recommendation related to rituximab.

Conclusion:

The CAPS guideline initiative met the objective of successful development of a clinical practice guideline in a rare disease using GRADE methodology. The novel methodology was found to be useful for complementing literature-based evidence in informing the recommendations.


Disclosure: K. Legault, Bayer, 9; C. Hillis, None; C. Yeung, None; E. Akl, None; M. Carrier, Leo Pharma, 5,Bayer, 5,Pfizer Inc, 5,Leo Pharma, 9,BMS, 9; R. Cervera, None; M. Crowther, Bayer, 2; F. Dentali, None; D. Erkan, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 5; G. Espinosa, None; M. A. Khamashta, None; J. Meerpohl, None; K. Moffatt, None; S. O'Brien, None; V. Pengo, None; J. Rand, None; I. Rodriguez, None; L. Thom, None; H. Schunemann, None; A. Iorio, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Legault K, Hillis C, Yeung C, Akl E, Carrier M, Cervera R, Crowther M, Dentali F, Erkan D, Espinosa G, Khamashta MA, Meerpohl J, Moffatt K, O'Brien S, Pengo V, Rand J, Rodriguez I, Thom L, Schunemann H, Iorio A. Methodology and Systematic Review of the Literature for the Mcmaster RARE-Best Practice Clinical Practice Guideline on Diagnosis and Management of the Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/methodology-and-systematic-review-of-the-literature-for-the-mcmaster-rare-best-practice-clinical-practice-guideline-on-diagnosis-and-management-of-the-catastrophic-antiphospholipid-syndrome/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/methodology-and-systematic-review-of-the-literature-for-the-mcmaster-rare-best-practice-clinical-practice-guideline-on-diagnosis-and-management-of-the-catastrophic-antiphospholipid-syndrome/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology