ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1869

Mental Health Care in Systemic Sclerosis; Rates of Utilization and Associated Factors in the Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort

Karima Becetti1, Jessica K. Gordon1, Joseph Nguyen2, Carol Mancuso3, Linda Kwakkenbos4,5, Marie-Eve Carrier4,5, Brett D. Thombs4,5, Robert F. Spiera1 and SPIN Investigators, 1Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 4McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 5Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Health Care, mental health and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud's – Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterized by high disfigurement, morbidity, and mortality. It carries significant psychosocial impact including depression, anxiety and body image distress. However, no previous studies evaluated mental health services (MHS) utilization in SSc. Our aim was to determine the rate and source of mental healthcare for patients with SSc, and explore factors associated with MHS use.

Methods: Subjects were adult patients with SSc enrolled in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort, recruited from Canada, the USA and Europe. Medical variables were provided by enrolling physicians. Subjects completed demographic variables, including questions on MHS use in the 3 months prior to enrollment, and questionnaires evaluating symptoms of depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance, body image distress, and pain. Demographic, medical, and psychological variables were compared between patients who had used MHS and those who did not using chi-square and independent samples t-tests (or non-parametric equivalents) as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was then used to identify potential factors predictive of MHS use in the last 3 months.

Results: Of the included 1000 subjects, 87% were females and 57% had limited SSc. Mean age was 55.2 ± 12.1 years and mean disease duration was 11.6 ± 8.9 years. 20% used MHS in the 3 months prior to enrollment. General practitioners were the most common providers of MHS (59%), followed by psychologists (21%) and psychiatrists (13%). MHS users had shorter disease duration, more pain and were more likely to report gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms compared to non-users (Table 1). They were more likely to smoke, live in the city, be divorced and disabled, and have more symptoms of depression, anxiety, fatigue, and body image distress. Adjusting for all other factors, MHS use was associated with being on disability (odds ratio [OR] 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-4.69), having shorter disease duration (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99), esophageal symptoms (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.14-5.06), and higher depression (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.10) and anxiety (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08) symptom scores (Table 2).

Conclusion:  20% of patients in the SPIN Cohort received mental health care in the 3 months prior to enrollment, of whom only 34% received care from a mental health specialist. Patients receiving MHS had earlier disease, more GI symptoms, higher disability, and more psychological distress. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the mental health needs of SSc patients and determine barriers to MHS use including cultural and health insurance factors.

Table 1. Differences in demographic, medical and psychological variables between subjects who used MHS in the 3 months prior to enrollment in the SPIN Cohort and those who did not*
    Variable   Used MHS (n = 195) Did Not Use MHS (n = 805)     p-value
Age (years) 54.1 (12.3) 55.5 (12.1) 0.14
Sex (female) 169 (87%) 701 (87%) 0.88
Race/Ethnicity** White 166 (85%) 664 (83%) Reference
Black 16 (8%) 47 (6%) 0.31
Other 13 (7%) 86 (11%) 0.10
Marital status Married 113 (58%) 536 (67%) Reference
Single 23 (12%) 97 (12%) 0.64
Widowed 7 (4%) 32 (4%) 0.93
Divorced 36 (18%) 81 (10%) < 0.01
Common Law 16 (8%) 52 (7%) 0.21
Education (years) 15.4 (3.2) 15.1 (3.1) 0.25
Current Occupation Full time/part time employed 65 (33%) 338 (42%) Reference
Unemployed 29 (15%) 103 (13%) 0.13
Retired 35 (18%) 207 (26%) 0.57
On disability 34 (17%) 55 (7%) < 0.01
Other 32 (16%) 102 (13%) 0.04
Housing location – City/urban (vs. non-city/urban) 79 (41%) 256 (32%) 0.02
Smoking 19 (10%) 39 (5%) 0.01
Alcohol 99 (51%) 394 (49%) 0.73
Diffuse disease subset (vs. limited) 114 (61%) 455 (58%) 0.36
Disease duration since first non-Raynaud’s manifestation (years) 9.9 (8.5) 12.0 (8.9) < 0.01
Modified Rodnan Skin Score 8.1 (9.4) 8.0 (8.6) 0.89
Gastrointestinal symptoms Esophageal 182 (93%) 686 (85%) 0.01
Stomach 75 (39%) 229 (29%) 0.02
Intestinal 88 (45%) 298 (37%) 0.06
Interstitial lung disease 76 (39%) 279 (35%) 0.41
Pulmonary arterial hypertension 18 (9%) 72 (9%) 0.93
Scleroderma renal crisis 7 (4%) 38 (5%) 0.48
Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8) 8.8 (6.0) 5.4 (5.0) < 0.01
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) Anxiety domain 56.7 (10.1) 50.2 (9.5) < 0.01
Fatigue domain 60.0 (9.6) 54.6 (11.3) < 0.01
Sleep disturbance domain 55.3 (7.8) 51.9 (8.7) < 0.01
Pain domain 57.8 (9.4) 55.2 (9.8) < 0.01
Satisfaction with Appearance Scale (SWAP) 34.8 (19.5) 29.7 (18.8) < 0.01
Social Interaction Anxiety Scale-6 (SIAS-6) 3.5 (4.8) 2.1 (3.4) < 0.01
Cochin Hand Function Scale (CHFS-II) 16.0 (17.6) 13.2 (15.9) 0.04
Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) 0.9 (0.7) 0.7 (0.7) < 0.01
*Values are presented as number (%) for categorical variables and mean (standard deviation) for categorical variables
**Consolidated variable accounting for the different understanding of race and ethnicity in different parts of the world
Table 2. Results from multivariable logistic regression analysis reporting factors predictive for mental health services utilization in the 3 months prior to enrollment in the SPIN cohort
Variable Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) p-value
Age 1.01 (0.99 – 1.03) 0.58
Male sex (vs. female) 0.86 (0.48 – 1.54) 0.62
Education 1.03 (0.97 – 1.09) 0.35
Marital status Married Reference
Single 0.72 (0.36 – 1.43) 0.35
Widowed 2.07 (0.81 – 5.31) 0.13
Divorced 1.68 (0.97 – 2.89) 0.06
Common Law 0.97 (0.46 – 2.03) 0.93
Current Occupation Full time/part time employed Reference
Unemployed 1.22 (0.67 – 2.24) 0.51
Retired 0.90 (0.50 – 1.62) 0.72
On Disability 2.50 (1.33 – 4.69) < 0.01
Other 1.69 (0.96 – 3.00) 0.07
Diffuse disease (vs. limited) 0.76 (0.50 – 1.15) 0.19
Disease duration 0.97 (0.95 – 0.99) 0.01
Gastrointestinal symptoms Esophageal 2.40 (1.14 – 5.06) 0.02
Stomach 1.21 (0.79 – 1.86) 0.38
Intestinal 0.83 (0.54 – 1.27) 0.39
PHQ-8 1.05 (1.00 – 1.10) 0.04
PROMIS-29 – Anxiety domain 1.05 (1.02 – 1.08) < 0.01
SWAP 1.00 (0.98 – 1.01) 0.69
SHAQ 0.86 (0.62 – 1.20) 0.38

Disclosure: K. Becetti, None; J. K. Gordon, None; J. Nguyen, None; C. Mancuso, None; L. Kwakkenbos, None; M. E. Carrier, None; B. D. Thombs, None; R. F. Spiera, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Becetti K, Gordon JK, Nguyen J, Mancuso C, Kwakkenbos L, Carrier ME, Thombs BD, Spiera RF. Mental Health Care in Systemic Sclerosis; Rates of Utilization and Associated Factors in the Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mental-health-care-in-systemic-sclerosis-rates-of-utilization-and-associated-factors-in-the-scleroderma-patient-centered-intervention-network-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mental-health-care-in-systemic-sclerosis-rates-of-utilization-and-associated-factors-in-the-scleroderma-patient-centered-intervention-network-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology