ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 387

Medication Choices and Medication Survival in a National Multicentre Community Based Rheumatoid Arthritis Cohort

Lynden Roberts1, Kathleen Tymms2, Julien P. de Jager3, Geoffrey O. Littlejohn4, Hedley Griffiths5, Dave Nicholls6, Paul Bird7, Julie Hill8, Philip McCloud8, James C. Scott9, Jane Zochling10 and OPAL Consortium11, 1School of Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia, 2Canberra Rheumatology, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 3Suite 2, Osler House, Southport, Australia, 4Rheumatology, Monash Medical Center, Melbourne, Australia, 5Barwon Rheumatology Service, Geelong, Australia, 6Coast Joint Care, Maroochydore, Australia, 7Combined Rheumatology Practice, Sydney, Australia, 8Statistics, McCloud Consulting Group, Sydney, Australia, 9Medical Affairs, Roche Products Pty Limited, Sydney, Australia, 10Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, Hobart, Australia, 11Melbourne, Australia

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: DMARDs and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects I: Drug Studies/Drug Safety/Drug Utilization/Disease Activity & Remission

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: A sizeable body of high-quality research underpins our knowledge of the efficacy of various RA therapies. Outside the controlled environment of these clinical trials, however, in real world practice many additional factors may influence the use of DMARD/bDMARDs. There is little knowledge of whether the trial evidence is being implemented in real world settings, or whether the trial efficacy and safety translates into clinical effectiveness.

Methods: Point of care clinical software has been used to collect data since 2009 from 20 participating Australian rheumatology treatment centres. Patients with a rheumatologist diagnosis of RA were identified. Medication changes were analysed in 9 prespecified categories to permit the construction of population treatment algorithms. Medication survival was assessed using Kaplan Meier plots. The change in disease activity following a medication change was also assessed.

Results: RA patients numbered 9570, with 73% female, mean age 62, and median disease duration 7 years. Any DMARD was used in 87% overall, and 30% had used a biologic DMARD. The DMARDbDMARD usage above 1% in the cohort included methotrexate 71%, Hydroxychloroquine 25%, Leflunomide 24%, Sulfasalazine 17%, Etanercept 12%, Adalimumab 11%, Tocilizumab 5%, Abatacept 3%, Golimumab 3%, Rituximab 2.5%, and Certolizumab 2%.  Median DMARD survival ranged from 49 to 231 months for the most common DMARDs and from 9 to 49 months for the most common biologic DMARDs. A tree diagram representing the observed treatment changes was constructed. Of the 2256 patients whose first RA medication was monotherapy Methotrexate and who required a change, 31% changed to greater than 1 conventional DMARD, 29% added Leflunomide, 17% added a bDMARD, and 16% ceased therapy. Of the 466 patients whose first change in RA medication was to Methotrexate plus Leflunomide and required a second change, 31% returned to monotherapy Methotrexate, 18% changed or added another conventional DMARD, 20% changed to monotherapy DMARD other than methotrexate, and 28% added a bDMARD.

Conclusion: Australian rheumatologists are making frequent changes in medications in their RA patients and appear to be implementing best evidence guidelines. Australian regulatory requirements for utilizing subsidised biologic therapy may also be affecting choices. The most commonly observed treatment algorithm in patients who required therapeutic escalation had patients starting with DMARD monotherapy followed by DMARD combination therapy followed by bDMARD combined with DMARD combination therapy. Shorter median survival of biologic therapies than traditional therapies may reflect the more refractory nature of the patients who are selected for these therapies. Analysis of the effect of a medication switch on disease activity will be of interest in this cohort.


Disclosure:

L. Roberts,
None;

K. Tymms,
None;

J. P. de Jager,
None;

G. O. Littlejohn,
None;

H. Griffiths,
None;

D. Nicholls,
None;

P. Bird,
None;

J. Hill,
None;

P. McCloud,
None;

J. C. Scott,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

3;

J. Zochling,
None;

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/medication-choices-and-medication-survival-in-a-national-multicentre-community-based-rheumatoid-arthritis-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology